PRADIPKUMAR HARAKCHAND DOSHI,MUMBAI vs. THE ITO , WARD-19(2)(5), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blepradipkumar Harakchand Doshi V. Income Tax Officer – 19(2)(5) 94/100, 2Nd Floor Matru Mandir, Grant Road 2Nd Pathan Street Mumbai - 400007 Mumbai - 400004 Pan: Aahpd4722B (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Neelkanth Khandelwal Assessee Represented By : Department Represented By : Shri H.M. Bhatt

condone the delay in presenting the appeal and admit the appeal in the fairness of law. Page No. 8 Pradipkumar Harakchand Doshi The craves leave to add, alter, amend or delete any or all of the above grounds of appeal.” 12. At the time of hearing, Ld.AR of the assessee brought to our notice relevant facts relating to the case

DY C.I.T. CENT CIR -6(2) , `MUMBAI vs. SHRI ASHOK B. JIWRAJKA, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are hereby dismissed and the cross objections filed by the assessee are allowed

delay is hereby condoned.\n\nITA No. 2355/Mum/2021; (Α.Υ. 2012-13)\n\n3. The revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:\n\ni) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Id. CITIA) erred in deleting the addition u/s.68 of the Act without appreciating the evidences mentioned by the assessing officer.\nii) On the facts and circumstances

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, THANE, THANE vs. M/S ACE PLASTICS , MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2011-12

delay is condoned and appeal is ordered to be registered. 3. Briefly stated facts necessary for adjudication of the issues at hand are : assessee is into the business of manufacturing of plastic containers, bottles, caps etc., filed return by declaring its income at Rs.39,62,080/- and also claimed deduction under section 80IB of the Income

DY.C.I.T. CENT. CIR -6(2), MUMBAI vs. SHRI ASHOK B.JIWRAJKA, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are hereby dismissed and the cross\nobjections filed by the assessee are allowed

delay is hereby condoned.\nITA No. 2355/Mum/2021; (Α.Υ. 2012-13)\n3. The revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:\ni) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Id. CITIA) erred in deleting the addition\nu/s.68 of the Act without appreciating the evidences mentioned by the assessing officer.\nii) On the facts and circumstances of the case

DY.C.I,T. CENT. CIR -6(2), MUMBAI vs. SHRI ASHOK B. JIWRAJKA, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are hereby dismissed and the cross\nobjections filed by the assessee are allowed

delay is hereby condoned.\n\nITA No. 2355/Mum/2021; (Α.Υ. 2012-13)\n\n3. The revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:\n\ni) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Id. CITIA) erred in deleting the addition\nu/s.68 of the Act without appreciating the evidences mentioned by the assessing officer.\nii) On the facts and circumstances

DY.CIT CENT. CIR -6(2) , MUMBAI vs. SHRI ASHOK B. JIWARJKA, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are hereby dismissed and the cross\nobjections filed by the assessee are allowed

delay is hereby condoned.\n\nITA No. 2355/Mum/2021; (Α.Υ. 2012-13)\n\n3. The revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:\n\ni) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Id. CITIA) erred in deleting the addition\nu/s.68 of the Act without appreciating the evidences mentioned by the assessing officer.\nii) On the facts and circumstances

I MARITIME CONSULTANCY PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO-15(2) (1) , MUMBAI

Appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri M Balaganesh, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.401/Mum/2022 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) I Maritime Ito-15(2) (1) Mumbai. Consultancy P. Ltd 11B 114, We Work 10Th Floor, Mumbai. Tower 1,Seawoods Grand 11B 114, We Work 10Th बिधम/ Central, Sector 40, Nerul, Floor, Tower 1, Seawoods Vs. Mumbai Maharashtra. Grand Central, Sector 40, 400706 Nerul, Mumbai 400706 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aaac17284B (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri. Jayant Bhatt प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. Manoj Sinha (Sr Ar) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 17.08.2022 Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 14.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Amit Shukla: 1. The Aforesaid Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against Order Date 04.02.2019 Passed By The Cit (Appeals), 24 Mumbai, In Relation To Penalty Proceedings U/S 271(1) (C) For The Ay 2013-2014. The Assessee Has Challenged The Levy Of Penalty Of Rs. 4,50,000/-

11B 114, We Work 10th बिधम/ Central, Sector 40, Nerul, Floor, Tower 1, Seawoods Vs. Mumbai Maharashtra. Grand Central, Sector 40, 400706 Nerul, Mumbai 400706 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN No. AAAC17284B (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri. Jayant Bhatt प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri. Manoj Sinha (SR AR) सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 17.08.2022 Date of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 14.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement आदेश