BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

17 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 801Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai17Ahmedabad2Delhi2Jaipur2Ranchi2Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 153A26Disallowance14Addition to Income14Section 80I12Section 80A6Section 139(1)6Section 143(1)3Section 1543Section 143(3)2Section 10A2Condonation of Delay2Deduction2

ITO WD 3(4), THANE vs. UMA DEVELOPERS, MUMBAI

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 7718/MUM/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Aug 2016AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sandeep Gosainincome Tax Officer-3(4) M/S. Uma Developers 6Th Floor, Ashar It Park Shop No. 2, Mayur Chs Ltd. Vs. Road No. 16Z, Wagle Indl. M.G. Road, Naupada Estate, Thane (W) 400601 Thane (W) - 400602 Pan - Aabfu8250F Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri A.K. DhondialFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Mehta
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 80ASection 80I

801B(10) is not allowable to the assessee. However, various judicial authorities have interpreted these provisions to mean that section 139(1) is directory not mandatory and that section 139(1) has to be read with section 139(4). Hon'ble Mumbai High Court in the case of Trustees of Tulsidas Gopalji Charitable & Chaleshwar Temple Trust

OM SAWMI SMARAN DEVELOPERS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 8(2)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 6915/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Ms Kavitha Rajagopal, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)

Charitable Trust (supra) held that no hard and fast rule can be laid down in the matter of condonation of delay and the Court should adopt a pragmatic approach and the Court should exercise their discretion on the facts of each case keeping in mind that in construing the expression "sufficient cause" the principle of advancing substantial justice

OM SAWMI SMARAN DEVELOPERS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 8(2)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 6916/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Ms Kavitha Rajagopal, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)

Charitable Trust (supra) held that no hard and fast rule can be laid down in the matter of condonation of delay and the Court should adopt a pragmatic approach and the Court should exercise their discretion on the facts of each case keeping in mind that in construing the expression "sufficient cause" the principle of advancing substantial justice

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-53, MUMBAI vs. SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2330/MUM/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S SAMSON MARITIME LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2343/MUM/2023[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5(3) , MUMBAI vs. M/S SAMSON MARITIME LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2344/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2258/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2259/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-53, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2262/MUM/2023[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2263/MUM/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

DCIT-CC5(3), MUMBAI vs. SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2326/MUM/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-53, MUMBAI vs. SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2329/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-53, MUMBAI vs. SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2327/MUM/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2261/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI CITY vs. DCIT, CC-5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2260/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-53, MUMBAI vs. SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2328/MUM/2023[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

Charitable Trust, the same cannot be denied exemption even if the actual activities are found to be in contravention of Sec. 12A of the Act would be absurd. To say that the project is approved by the local authority is enough to prove that the assessee is eligible for claim u/s 801B of the Act, would also be incorrect

ACIT, MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas the cross-objection of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3705/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2014-15 Acit, Reliance Industries Ltd., Room No. 559, 5Th Floor, 3Rd Floor Maker Chamber Iv, Aayakar Bhavan, New Marine Vs. Nariman Point, S.O. Lines, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacr 5055 K Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Madhur Agarwal/Ms. MokshaFor Respondent: Ms. Sanyogita Nagpal, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 115JSection 144BSection 144CSection 147Section 801B(9)

801B(9) deduction to the extent of Rs. 15,26,13,821/- (20.97 % of Rs. 72,77,72, 160/-). It is pertinent to note that non allowing additional depreciation during tax holiday period not only result in higher claim of deduction but also result in higher carry forward of WDV which would reduce the profitability of the assess after