BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur14Chennai8Amritsar6Ahmedabad5Agra4Chandigarh4Mumbai4Bangalore3Delhi3Kolkata2Surat1

Key Topics

Section 69A6Section 116Section 143(3)4Section 2634Section 1324Addition to Income4Section 115B3Section 153A2Section 132(4)2

AYYAPPA SEVA SAMGHAM BOMBAY TRUST,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A)-53, MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 135/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyalayyappa Seva Samgham Bombay-Trust Plot No.185, Shree Ayyappa Temple Bangur Nagar, Goregaon (E) Mumbai-400 104 Pan: Aaata0312K ...... Appellant Vs. Cit (A), 53 634, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400 020 ..... Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S. C. TiwariFor Respondent: Smt. Shailja Rai CIT-DR
Section 11Section 115BSection 12ASection 133ASection 143(3)Section 263Section 69A

trust or institution created or established wholly for religious and charitable purposes other than any anonymous donation made with a specific direction that such donation is for any university or other educational (3) For the purposes of this section, "anonymous donation" means any voluntary contribution referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section 2, where a person

Exemption2
Unexplained Investment2
Search & Seizure2

DCIT (EX) - 1(1), MUMBAI vs. THE LOHAR CHAWL DAWOODI BOHRA MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned Assessing Officer is dismissed

ITA 3635/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Shri Prashant Maharishithe Dy. Commissioner Of The Lohar Chawl Dawoodi Income Tax (Ex) -1(1) Bohra Merchants’ Association Room No. 506, 5 Th Floor, Piramal Chambers, 56/62, Chandabai Bldg., Vs. Lalbaug, Parel, 2Nd Floor, Mangaldas Road, Lohar Chawl, Mumbai-400 012 Mumbai-400 002 Pan No. Aaatl0024D Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Deepak TralshawalaFor Respondent: Ms. Surabhi Sharma, CIT DR
Section 1Section 11Section 13(3)Section 36ASection 36A(3)Section 69A

charitable in nature and are as per the objects of the trust. With respect to the applicability of Section 13 (1) (b) of the Act that the above trust exists for the purpose of a particular community, he held that the membership of the trust was open to any person who carries on any business or commercial activity in Lohar

MR. ANIL KANTILAL SHAH,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A)-51, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse vide

ITA 227/MUM/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.227 & 228/Mum/2023 (A.Ys. 2018-19 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Anil ThakrarFor Respondent: Ashok Kumar Kardam
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 69B

section 153A of the ACT but nothing concrete was found during the search & rather all the entries in the book of the Appellant as well in the books of the search party were matching rupee to rupee. 2. The LD CIT (A) is Erred in confirming a sum of RS:- 42,69,000/- without proving cash had changed hands

MR. ANIL KANTILAL SHAH,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A)-51, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse vide

ITA 228/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.227 & 228/Mum/2023 (A.Ys. 2018-19 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Anil ThakrarFor Respondent: Ashok Kumar Kardam
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 69B

section 153A of the ACT but nothing concrete was found during the search & rather all the entries in the book of the Appellant as well in the books of the search party were matching rupee to rupee. 2. The LD CIT (A) is Erred in confirming a sum of RS:- 42,69,000/- without proving cash had changed hands