BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 36Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune26Mumbai5Raipur4Nagpur3Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A25Section 115Exemption5Section 36A4Charitable Trust3Section 80G2Section 36A(3)2Section 69A2

DCIT (EX) - 1(1), MUMBAI vs. THE LOHAR CHAWL DAWOODI BOHRA MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned Assessing Officer is dismissed

ITA 3635/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Shri Prashant Maharishithe Dy. Commissioner Of The Lohar Chawl Dawoodi Income Tax (Ex) -1(1) Bohra Merchants’ Association Room No. 506, 5 Th Floor, Piramal Chambers, 56/62, Chandabai Bldg., Vs. Lalbaug, Parel, 2Nd Floor, Mangaldas Road, Lohar Chawl, Mumbai-400 012 Mumbai-400 002 Pan No. Aaatl0024D Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Deepak TralshawalaFor Respondent: Ms. Surabhi Sharma, CIT DR
Section 1Section 11Section 13(3)Section 36ASection 36A(3)Section 69A

36A of the Bombay Public Trust Act. He accepted the explanation of the assessee and the remand report of the assessing officer wherein, the learned AO has accepted that no loans were taken by the trust during the relevant year and no property of the trust has been utilized for the advantage of the trustees. He further accepted that

MULBHUT ADHIKAR KARYA SANSTHA,THANE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 3189/MUM/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jun 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: BEFORESHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rohan DedhiaFor Respondent: Shri Uma Shankar Prasad (CIT DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 36ASection 36A(3)

Section 36A(3) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, prohibits trustees from borrowing money—whether through mortgage or otherwise—on behalf of the trust without the prior sanction of the Charity Commissioner and subject to the conditions and limitations imposed by the Commissioner in the interest of the trust. The Ld. CIT(E) accordingly held that the assessee failed

ZENITH CHARITABLE TRUST ,MUMBAI vs. CIT (E), MUMBAI

In the result, the present appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1152/MUM/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Poojan MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta
Section 12ASection 36ASection 80G

36A of BPT Act for taking loan has been taken. Al these facts are undisputed. 6. The facts highlighted above clearly show that Zenith Charitable Trust ITAs no.1152/Mum./2019 and 1153/Mum./2019 a) The source of receipts of the Trust is unknown. b) There is no record of expenditure incurred. Therefore, it cannot be verified that the amount has been

ZENITH CHARITABLE TRUST ,MUMBAI vs. CIT (E), MUMBAI

In the result, the present appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1153/MUM/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Poojan MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Prabhat Kumar Gupta
Section 12ASection 36ASection 80G

36A of BPT Act for taking loan has been taken. Al these facts are undisputed. 6. The facts highlighted above clearly show that Zenith Charitable Trust ITAs no.1152/Mum./2019 and 1153/Mum./2019 a) The source of receipts of the Trust is unknown. b) There is no record of expenditure incurred. Therefore, it cannot be verified that the amount has been

TEJIBAI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. COOMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI

ITA 4342/MUM/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Apr 2019AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.4342/Mum/2018 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : (2018-19) Tejibai Educational बिाम/ Cit (Exemption), Society, Mumbai, 6 Th Floor, L-501, Greenwoods Piramal Chambers, V. Society, M.V. Road, Lalbaug, Parel, Chakala, Andheri (E), Mumbai -400012 Mumbai 400093 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan: Aadtt1011D (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Anant Pai Revenue By: Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy (Cit-Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 09.04.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.04.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar: This Appeal, Filed By Assessee, Being Ita No. 4342/Mum/2018, Is Directed Against Order Bearing No. Cit(E)/U/S.12A/50000/2018-19 Dated 30.05.2018, Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Cit(E)”) U/S. 12Aa(1)(B)(Ii) Read With Section 12A Of The Income-Tax Act,1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act”). 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By Assessee In The Memo Of Appeal Filed With The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Tribunal”) Read As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Anant PaiFor Respondent: Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy
Section 12A

36A(1) of the BPT Act, Powers and duties and restrictions of trustees: I.T.A. No.4342/Mum/2018 D) Income and expenditure related to the school was shown in the individual account of Mrs. Sushila Khairajani and not in the name of the trust. The Trust was not even a holding any PAN all these years and has applied