RAMRAO ADIK EDUCATION SOCIETY ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 7(1), MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 7 (1) , MUMBAI vs. RAMRAO ADIK EDUC SOCIETY, MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

RAMRAO ADIK EDUCATION SOCIETY ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 7(1), MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

RAMRAO ADIK EDUCATION SOCIETY ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 7(1), MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 7 (1) , MUMBAI vs. RAMRAO ADIK EDUC SOCIETY, MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 7 (1) , MUMBAI vs. RAMRAO ADIK EDUC SOCIETY, MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

RAMRAO ADIK EDUCATION SOCIETY ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 7(1), MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

RAMRAO ADIK EDUCATION SOCIETY ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 7(1), MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 7 1, MUMBAI vs. RAMRAO ADIK EDUC SOCIETY, MUMBAI

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable institutions. The assessee is running Engineering,\nArchitecture and other courses at Navi Mumbai. There was a search operation\nunder section 132 on the group entities i.e. D Y Patil University (Navi Mumbai),\nits trustees, certain employees from 27.07.2016 to 29.07.2016. In the course of\nsearch statement under Section 132(4) was recorded from the following persons:\n(a) Shri

ESTATE OF VANDRAVAN P SHAH,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 19(3), MUMBAI

In the result all the three captioned appeals are dismissed

Bench: Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant ()

Trust and claimed deduction under section 35AC. claimed deduction under section 35AC. 4.2 The search assessment u/s 153C of the Act was completed in The search assessment u/s 153C of the Act was completed in The search assessment u/s 153C of the Act was completed in the case of M/s Navjeevan Charitable

HEMENDRA RAMJI VIRA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

charitable institutions who are assessed u/s 11 to 13. In the said case the Hon’ble Orrisa High Court (2023) 151 taxmann.com 433 (Orissa) dated 06/03/2019 held that since the jurisdiction was with the AO (Exemption) on the basis of an affidavit filed by the revenue only, the notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act by the ld.AO Corporate

HEMENDRA RAMJI VIRA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

charitable institutions who are assessed u/s 11 to 13. In the said case the Hon’ble Orrisa High Court (2023) 151 taxmann.com 433 (Orissa) dated 06/03/2019 held that since the jurisdiction was with the AO (Exemption) on the basis of an affidavit filed by the revenue only, the notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act by the ld.AO Corporate

HEMENDRA RAMJI VIRA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable institutions who are assessed u/s 11 to 13. In the said case the Hon’ble Orrisa High Court (2023) 151 taxmann.com 433 (Orissa) dated 06/03/2019 held that since the jurisdiction was with the AO (Exemption) on the basis of an affidavit filed by the revenue only, the notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act by the ld.AO Corporate

HEMENDRA RAMJI VIRA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

charitable institutions who are assessed u/s 11 to 13. In the said case the Hon’ble Orrisa High Court (2023) 151 taxmann.com 433 (Orissa) dated 06/03/2019 held that since the jurisdiction was with the AO (Exemption) on the basis of an affidavit filed by the revenue only, the notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act by the ld.AO Corporate

HEMENDRA RAMJI VIRA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

charitable institutions who are assessed u/s 11 to 13. In the said case the Hon’ble Orrisa High Court (2023) 151 taxmann.com 433 (Orissa) dated 06/03/2019 held that since the jurisdiction was with the AO (Exemption) on the basis of an affidavit filed by the revenue only, the notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act by the ld.AO Corporate

HEMENDRA RAMJI VIRA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

charitable institutions who are assessed u/s 11 to 13. In the said case the Hon’ble Orrisa High Court (2023) 151 taxmann.com 433 (Orissa) dated 06/03/2019 held that since the jurisdiction was with the AO (Exemption) on the basis of an affidavit filed by the revenue only, the notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act by the ld.AO Corporate

HEMENDRA RAMJI VIRA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

charitable institutions who are assessed u/s 11 to 13. In the said case the Hon’ble Orrisa High Court (2023) 151 taxmann.com 433 (Orissa) dated 06/03/2019 held that since the jurisdiction was with the AO (Exemption) on the basis of an affidavit filed by the revenue only, the notice issued u/s 143(2) of the Act by the ld.AO Corporate

MR. SAURABH ANIL GANDHI ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 42(3)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadavshri Sandeep Singh Karhailmr. Saurabh Anil Gandhi A-502 Chanakya Chs Ltd. Mahavir Nagar, Opp. Ekta Nagar, New Link Road, Kandivali West, Mumbai- 400067 ............... Appellant Pan: Aelpg7302J

153C of the Act, being mandatory for a case where incriminating material is found in search of third party and thereby the re-opening proceeding is bad in law. 4. upholding the action of AO of reopening the assessment under section 147 of the Act, which was undertaken merely on the basis of statement recorded during the search/ survey proceedings