ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE EMERGING MARKETS MAURITIUS COMPANY ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TP) 2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadavshri Sandeep Singh Karhailishares Core Msci Emerging Markets Etf (As A Successor To Ishares Core Emerging Markets Mauritius Company) C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 17Th Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Marg, ............... Appellant Dadar (West), Mumbai - 400028 Pan : Aafci3337N V/S Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Tax) - 2(2)(2) Room No.606, 6Th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, ……………… Respondent C-41 To C-43, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 Ishares Msci All Country Asia Ex Japan Etf C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 17Th Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai - 400028 Pan : Aabti7439L ............... Appellant

section 74 of the Act. Grounds of Appeal Nos. 8 - 12: Failure to allow set-off of brought forward long-term capital 7. erred in setting off the long -term capital losses brought forward from earlier Assessment Years amounting to Rs. 26,506,339,311 against the current year's net long-term capital gains

ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN ETF,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

section 74 of the Act.\nGrounds of Appeal Nos. 8 12: Failure to allow set-off of brought\nforward long-term capital\n7. erred in setting off the long -term capital losses brought forward from earlier\n Assessment Years amounting to Rs. 26,506,339,311 against the current year's\nnet long-term capital gains

RELIANCE POWER LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 15(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh& Shri Omkareshwar Chidara(Physical Hearing) Dcit – 15(3)(1), Mumbai Reliance Power Limited Room No. 460, 4Th Floor, H-Block, 1St Floor, Dhirubhai Ambani Vs Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Knowledge City, Koperkhairane, Mumbai – 400020] Navi Mumbai-400710 [Pan: Aaacr2365L] Appellant / Revenue Respondent / Assessee Reliance Power Limited Dcit – 15(3)(1), Mumbai Room No. 460, 4Th Floor, Aayakar Reliance Centre, Ground Floor, 19 Vs Walchand Hirachand Marg, Bhavan, M.K. Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai – 400001. Mumbai – 400020] [Pan: Aaacr2365L] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

8,58,96.951 treating the same as short term capital gain u/s 50 of the Act. ITA Nos. 890 1348/Mum/2023 & C.O. 71/Mum/2023 Reliance Power Ltd. Your appellant submits that under the facts and in the circumstances of your appellant's case the capital gains on sale of helicopter ought to be treated as long term capital gains for the purpose

TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the question of law referred to the Special Bench is answered in favour of the assessee

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Arun Khodpiatata Communications Limited Pr. Cit, Videsh Sanchar Bhavan, Mumbai-1 Vs. M. G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Pan/Gir No. Aaacv 2808 C (Appellant) : (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri J. D. Mistri Respondent By : Shri Ritesh Misra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2025 O R D E R Per Saktijit Dey: The Present Appeal, At The Instance Of The Assessee, Assails Order Dated 21.03.2025, Passed U/S. 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ For Short), By Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (‘Ld. Pcit’ For Short), Pertaining To The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2018-19. 2. Though The Assessee Has Raised Multiple Grounds, Both On Jurisdictional Issues As Well As On Merits, However, There Is Consensus Between The Parties That The Appeal Can Be Decided On Merits, In Which Event, There Is No Need To Go Into Various Other Issues Raised In Appeal.

8 Tata Communications Limited vs. Pr. CIT 25. In our opinion, the assessee cannot be denied exemption under section 54E, because, firstly, there is nothing in section 50 to suggest that the fiction created in Section 50 is not only restricted to sections 48 and 49 but also applies to other provisions. On the contrary, Section 50 makes it explicitly

SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 4(2)(1), MUMBAI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

gain arising from transfer of a short term capital asset but the rate of tax has to be applicable in terms of section 112 of the Act, because the treatment of a short term capital asset is only a purpose of section 50 and not otherwise can convert a 'long term capital asset' into a 'short term capital asset

ACIT 421 MUMBAI, MUMBAI CITY vs. SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI, MUMBAI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and the\nappeal of the revenue is dismissed

gain arising from transfer of a short term capital asset but the\nrate of tax has to be applicable in terms of section 112 of the Act, because the\ntreatment of a short term capital asset is only a purpose of section 50 and not\notherwise can convert a 'long term capital asset' into a 'short term capital asset

FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST FIDELITY SAI EMERGING MARKETS INDEX FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(3)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

capital gain. 7. Erred in granting credit for taxes deducted at source only to the extent of INR 10,09,36,049 as against INR 106,223,167 as claimed by the Appellant in the return of income. 8. Erred in levying interest under section

EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF TEXAS ,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

capital gain. 7. Erred in granting credit for taxes deducted at source only to the extent of INR 10,09,36,049 as against INR 106,223,167 as claimed by the Appellant in the return of income. 8. Erred in levying interest under section

ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE EMERGING MARKETS MAURITIUS COMPANY),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

8. In the case of Flagship Indian Investment Co (Mauritius) Ltd.(supra), the\nassessee had claimed benefit of Article -13 of the DTAA in respect of 'Capital Gains'\nand had sought to carry forward capital losses of the earlier years as the same\ncould not be set off against capital gains for the relevant assessment year. The\nAssessing Officer

ISHARES CORE MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

section 142(1) of the Act were\nissued and served on the assessee. During the assessment proceedings, it\n7\nITAs No. 2085, 2134, 2147, 2148, 2149, 2150, 2151, 2152, 2153, 2154/Mum/2025 8\nwas observed that the assessee computed the net short-term capital gains

ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN ETF(AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN MAURITIUS CO),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

8. In the case of Flagship Indian Investment Co (Mauritius) Ltd.(supra), the\nassessee had claimed benefit of Article -13 of the DTAA in respect of 'Capital Gains'\nand had sought to carry forward capital losses of the earlier years as the same\ncould not be set off against capital gains for the relevant assessment year. The\nAssessing Officer

ISHARES CORE MSCI TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

8. In the case of Flagship Indian Investment Co (Mauritius) Ltd.(supra), the\nassessee had claimed benefit of Article -13 of the DTAA in respect of 'Capital Gains'\nand had sought to carry forward capital losses of the earlier years as the same\ncould not be set off against capital gains for the relevant assessment year. The\nAssessing Officer

ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES EMERGING MARKETS INDEX MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

8. In the case of Flagship Indian Investment Co (Mauritius) Ltd.(supra), the\nassessee had claimed benefit of Article -13 of the DTAA in respect of 'Capital Gains'\nand had sought to carry forward capital losses of the earlier years as the same\ncould not be set off against capital gains for the relevant assessment year. The\nAssessing Officer

ISHARES MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD DIST ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

8. In the case of Flagship Indian Investment Co (Mauritius) Ltd.(supra), the\nassessee had claimed benefit of Article -13 of the DTAA in respect of 'Capital Gains'\nand had sought to carry forward capital losses of the earlier years as the same\ncould not be set off against capital gains for the relevant assessment year. The\nAssessing Officer

ISHARES INDIA 50 ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

section 142(1) of the Act were\nissued and served on the assessee. During the assessment proceedings, it\n8\nITAs No. 2085, 2134, 2147, 2148, 2149, 2150, 2151, 2152, 2153, 2154/Mum/2025 8\nwas observed that the assessee computed the net short-term capital gains

ISHARES MSCI INDIA ETF(AS A SUCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA INDEX MARUITIUS COMPANY),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

8. In the case of Flagship Indian Investment Co (Mauritius) Ltd.(supra), the\nassessee had claimed benefit of Article -13 of the DTAA in respect of 'Capital Gains'\nand had sought to carry forward capital losses of the earlier years as the same\ncould not be set off against capital gains for the relevant assessment year. The\nAssessing Officer

ISHARES MSCI INDIA UCITS ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

8. In the case of Flagship Indian Investment Co (Mauritius) Ltd.(supra), the\nassessee had claimed benefit of Article -13 of the DTAA in respect of 'Capital Gains'\nand had sought to carry forward capital losses of the earlier years as the same\ncould not be set off against capital gains for the relevant assessment year. The\nAssessing Officer

SCHWAB EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -4(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

8. In the case of Flagship Indian Investment Co (Mauritius) Ltd.(supra), the\nassessee had claimed benefit of Article -13 of the DTAA in respect of 'Capital Gains'\nand had sought to carry forward capital losses of the earlier years as the same\ncould not be set off against capital gains for the relevant assessment year. The\nAssessing Officer

MORGAN STANLEY MAURITIUS COMPANY LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-CIRCLE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Morgan Stanley Mauritius Company Dy. Cit (International Taxation) – Ltd., Circle 3(2)(2), Vs. C/O S R B C & Associates Llp, 14Th 16Th Floor, Room No. 1615, Air India Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Building Nariman Point, Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400028. Pan No. Aadcm 5927 G Appellant Respondent

section 74(1)will require (i). a Morgan Stanley Mauritius Company Ltd. Morgan Stanley Mauritius Company Ltd. 8 loss which arises as the net result of computation under the head loss which arises as the net result of computation under the head loss which arises as the net result of computation under the head "Capital Gains