ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE EMERGING MARKETS MAURITIUS COMPANY ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TP) 2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadavshri Sandeep Singh Karhailishares Core Msci Emerging Markets Etf (As A Successor To Ishares Core Emerging Markets Mauritius Company) C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 17Th Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Marg, ............... Appellant Dadar (West), Mumbai - 400028 Pan : Aafci3337N V/S Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Tax) - 2(2)(2) Room No.606, 6Th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, ……………… Respondent C-41 To C-43, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 Ishares Msci All Country Asia Ex Japan Etf C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 17Th Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai - 400028 Pan : Aabti7439L ............... Appellant

gains (on which STT was not paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of section 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital loss, and the same reads as follows: - "(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year under sections 48 to 55

RELIANCE POWER LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 15(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, ground of appeal raised by assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh& Shri Omkareshwar Chidara(Physical Hearing) Dcit – 15(3)(1), Mumbai Reliance Power Limited Room No. 460, 4Th Floor, H-Block, 1St Floor, Dhirubhai Ambani Vs Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Knowledge City, Koperkhairane, Mumbai – 400020] Navi Mumbai-400710 [Pan: Aaacr2365L] Appellant / Revenue Respondent / Assessee Reliance Power Limited Dcit – 15(3)(1), Mumbai Room No. 460, 4Th Floor, Aayakar Reliance Centre, Ground Floor, 19 Vs Walchand Hirachand Marg, Bhavan, M.K. Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai – 400001. Mumbai – 400020] [Pan: Aaacr2365L] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

2. The CIT(A) erred in confirming the conclusion reached by the Learned Assessing Officer that, as per provisions of section 50 any capital gain arising out of sale of depreciable assets is in the nature of short term capital gain and accordingly the same is subject to tax at the rate applicable to short term capital gain. Your appellant

RAMESH JAISINGHANI,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -5(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

capital gain is chargeable because the cost of acquisition is not ascertainable]. 32 Ramesh Jaisinghani Note 6. Chargeable because of section 112A read with section 45 read with section 48 read with Explanation (a)(iii) (AA) to section 55(2

TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the question of law referred to the Special Bench is answered in favour of the assessee

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Arun Khodpiatata Communications Limited Pr. Cit, Videsh Sanchar Bhavan, Mumbai-1 Vs. M. G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Pan/Gir No. Aaacv 2808 C (Appellant) : (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri J. D. Mistri Respondent By : Shri Ritesh Misra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2025 O R D E R Per Saktijit Dey: The Present Appeal, At The Instance Of The Assessee, Assails Order Dated 21.03.2025, Passed U/S. 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ For Short), By Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (‘Ld. Pcit’ For Short), Pertaining To The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2018-19. 2. Though The Assessee Has Raised Multiple Grounds, Both On Jurisdictional Issues As Well As On Merits, However, There Is Consensus Between The Parties That The Appeal Can Be Decided On Merits, In Which Event, There Is No Need To Go Into Various Other Issues Raised In Appeal.

55. As the depreciable capital assets have also availed depreciation allowance under section 32, section 50 provides for a special procedure for computation of capital gains in the case of depreciable assets. Section 50(1) deals with the cases where any block of depreciable assets do not cease to exist on account of transfer and Section 50(2

SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 4(2)(1), MUMBAI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

55. As the depreciable capital assets have also availed depreciation allowance under section 32, section 50 provides for a special procedure for computation of capital gains in the case of depreciable assets. Section 50(1) deals with the cases where any block of depreciable assets do not cease to exist on account of transfer and Section 50(2

ACIT 421 MUMBAI, MUMBAI CITY vs. SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI, MUMBAI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and the\nappeal of the revenue is dismissed

55. As the\ndepreciable capital assets have also availed depreciation allowance under section\n32, section 50 provides for a special procedure for computation of capital gains in\nthe case of depreciable assets. Section 50(1) deals with the cases where any block\nof depreciable assets do not cease to exist on account of transfer and Section 50(2

EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF TEXAS ,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

2,33,574/- Long term capital gain at 10% rate (as per computation) 1,49,431/- I have perused the assessment order and have considered submissions of the A/R. In the impugned order the A.O. has not given any reasons for first sitting off short term capital gain with STT against short term capital STT and then allow

FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST FIDELITY SAI EMERGING MARKETS INDEX FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(3)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

2,33,574/- Long term capital gain at 10% rate (as per computation) 1,49,431/- I have perused the assessment order and have considered submissions of the A/R. In the impugned order the A.O. has not given any reasons for first sitting off short term capital gain with STT against short term capital STT and then allow

ISHARES CORE MSCI TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES EMERGING MARKETS INDEX MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

ISHARES CORE MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

ISHARES MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD DIST ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

ISHARES MSCI INDIA UCITS ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

ISHARES MSCI INDIA ETF(AS A SUCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA INDEX MARUITIUS COMPANY),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid).\nBefore proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

SCHWAB EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -4(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains (on which STT\nwas not paid).\nBefore proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

ISHARES INDIA 50 ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE EMERGING MARKETS MAURITIUS COMPANY),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55

ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN ETF(AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN MAURITIUS CO),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains (on which STT was\nnot paid). Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of\nsection 70(2) of the Act, which deals with the set off of short-term capital\nloss, and the same reads as follows:\n\"(2) Where the result of the computation made for any assessment year\nunder sections 48 to 55