ISHARES MSCI INDIA UCITS ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

section 144C(5) of the Act\nissued by the Hon'ble DRP - I, Mumbai dated 4 December 2024 on the following\ngrounds, each of which is without prejudice to and independent of the others:\n\nOn the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned AO/\nHon'ble DRP:\n\nGeneral\n\n1. Erred

ISHARES INDIA 50 ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

section 234B of the Act, which is consequential\nin nature. Therefore, the same needs no separate adjudication.\n66.\nGround no.15, raised in assessee's appeal, pertains to the initiation of\npenalty proceedings under section 270A of the Act, which is premature in\nnature. Therefore, the said ground is dismissed.\n43\nITAs

ISHARES CORE MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

section 270A of the Act, which is premature in\nnature. Therefore, the said ground is dismissed.\n67. In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes.\n42\nITAs No. 2085, 2134, 2147, 2148, 2149, 2150, 2151, 2152, 2153, 2154/Mum/2025 43\nITA No. 2150/Mum/2025\nIShare MSCI Emerging Markets ETF – A.Y. 2022-23\n68. In this appeal

ISHARES MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD DIST ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

Capital losses adopted\nby the Appellant\n\n2. erred in rejecting the hierarchy of set-off of short-term capital losses\nadopted by the Appellant and thereby, taxing the gross short-term capital\ngains in respect of transactions on the sale of shares not chargeable to\nSecurities Transaction Tax (\"STT\"):\n3. failed to appreciate that income under the head 'Capital

ISHARES MSCI INDIA ETF(AS A SUCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA INDEX MARUITIUS COMPANY),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

391, claimed as not\nchargeable to tax under Article 13 of the India Mauritius (IM Treaty)\n8. erred in holding that long-term capital gains not chargeable to tax under\nthe IM Treaty form part of the 'total income' of the Appellant as per section

ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN ETF(AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN MAURITIUS CO),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

391, claimed as not\nchargeable to tax under Article 13 of the India Mauritius (IM Treaty)\n8. erred in holding that long-term capital gains not chargeable to tax under\nthe IM Treaty form part of the 'total income' of the Appellant as per section

ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES EMERGING MARKETS INDEX MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

391, claimed as not\nchargeable to tax under Article 13 of the India Mauritius (IM Treaty)\n8. erred in holding that long-term capital gains not chargeable to tax under\nthe IM Treaty form part of the 'total income' of the Appellant as per section

SCHWAB EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -4(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

391, claimed as not\nchargeable to tax under Article 13 of the India Mauritius (IM Treaty)\n8. erred in holding that long-term capital gains not chargeable to tax under\nthe IM Treaty form part of the 'total income' of the Appellant as per section

TATA SONS LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT 2, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

section 48\nbecomes wholly inapplicable and it would not be possible to\ncompute profits or gains arising from the transfer of the capital\nasset. Further, according to him while transfer consists in\nextinguishment of a right in the capital asset, there must be an\nelement of consideration for such extinguishment, for then only\nit would be a 'transfer' exigible

EMERGING MARKETS INDEX NON-LENDABLE FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

391,602.\nLevy of interest under section 234C of the Act - Rs.146,705\n15. erred in levying interest under Section 234C of the Act amounting\nto Rs.146,705.\nLevy of interest under section 234D of the Act-Rs.10,020\n16. erred in levying interest under Section 234D of the Act amounting\nto Rs.10,020.\nInitiation of penal proceedings under

EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INDEX MASTER FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY CIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

391,602.\nLevy of interest under section 234C of the Act - Rs.146,705\n15. erred in levying interest under Section 234C of the Act amounting\nto Rs.146,705.\nLevy of interest under section 234D of the Act-Rs.10,020\n16. erred in levying interest under Section 234D of the Act amounting\nto Rs.10,020.\nInitiation of penal proceedings under

I SHARES ESG AWARE MSCI EM ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ) -2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

391,602.\nLevy of interest under section 234C of the Act - Rs.146,705\n15. erred in levying interest under Section 234C of the Act amounting\nto Rs.146,705.\nLevy of interest under section 234D of the Act-Rs.10,020\n16. erred in levying interest under Section 234D of the Act amounting\nto Rs.10,020.\nInitiation of penal proceedings under

ITO 41(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. DEEPIKA ANIL AGARWAL, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue stands\ndismissed

section 147, of the\nIncome-tax Act, 1961 Capital gains - Income\narising from transfer of long-term securities\n(Bogus transactions) Assessment year 2006-\n07 Assesse purchased 3000 shares of\ncompany 'T' through a stock broker These\nshares were transferred to assesses demat\naccount - However, said stock broker submitted\nbefore authorities that he was providing\naccommodation entries for taking profit

RAMESH JAISINGHANI,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -5(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

capital gain getting chargeable]. 46. Thus, the amendment not only introduced a new formula but effectively created a new category of taxable events transfers of unlisted shares preceding listing. This category did not exist under the pre-amendment regime. The insertion thus enlarged the tax base, which is the hallmark of a substantive, not clarificatory, amendment. It would therefore

SHAILY PRINCE GOYAL,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-27(3)(1), NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee Shri Yogesh Popatlal Thakkar in ITA No

capital gain exemption U/s 10(38) of the Act. The relevant documents like bank transaction, share transaction copy, paid through STT, ledger and demat account were duly submitted before the revenue authorities. The Ld.AR relied on the order of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court and the Tribunal which are as follows: - 4.1. Luminaire Technologies Limited. order dated 27/07/2012

PREETI CHIRANIA,MUMBAI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 28(2)(4), NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee partly allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Ms. Padmavathy Svs. Ito, Ward – 28(2)(4) Preeti Chirania 309, 3Rd Floor, Tower No. Flat No.3, 1St Floor, 6, Vashi Rly Stn., Mangesh Santa Durga Commercial Complex, Chs, Sector – 17, Nerul Vashi Navi Mumbai – 400 (E), Navi Mumbai – 400 703. 706. Pan/Gir No. Akbpc0636M (Applicant) (Respondent)

391 of the paper book. Subsequently 50000 shares were credited to the assesse demat account. The assesse in the F.Y 2011-12 has sold 9000 shares and remaining 41000 shares were available in demat account. Further the shares were split in the ratio of 1:10 and accordingly 41000 equity shares held by the assesse are split into 410000 equity

ANJU CHIRANIA,MUMBAI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 4(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Judicialmember & Shri Girish Agrawalanju Chirania, Vs. Ito, Ward –4(1)(3), 301, Sona Chambers, Room No. 637, 507/509, Jss Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Chira Bazar, Marine Lines, M.K.Road, Mumbai – 400 002. Mumbai-400020. Pan/Gir No. Afcpc9073Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gains on shares. Further the AO find that there is no correlation of price rise and the financial/ fundamental statements of the company. Finally the AO was not satisfied with the explanations and material information and observed that the transactions are not genuine and made addition of sale proceeds u/sec 69 of the Act of Rs.2

ALPESH K. AJMERA HUF ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 18(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands\nallowed

section 147, of the\nIncome-tax Act, 1961 Capital gains Income\narising from transfer of long-term securities\n(Bogus transactions) Assessment year 2006-\n07 Assesse purchased 3000 shares of\ncompany 'T' through a stock broker These\nshares were transferred to assesses demat\naccount However, said stock broker\nsubmitted before authorities that he was\nproviding accommodation entries for taking\nprofit