SCHWAB EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -4(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES EMERGING MARKETS INDEX MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD DIST ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES INDIA 50 ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES CORE MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES MSCI INDIA UCITS ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order

ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN ETF(AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN MAURITIUS CO),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES CORE MSCI TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

PRASHANT KOTHARI,SINGAPORE vs. CIT A (57) MUMBAI, OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS MUMBAI

In the result, the additional ground of\nappeal is allowed

section 90 of the Act and by force of Article 13(4) of DTAA and\nsection 90(2) of the IT Act, capital gain arising to resident of Singapore is\nnot taxable in India and therefore, Article 24 was not applicable in the case\nof the appellant. To support the argument, the appellant relied upon the\ndecisions in the case

EMERGING MARKETS INDEX NON-LENDABLE FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

gains chargeable to tax against brought forward\nlong term capital loss in the computation sheet;\n12. Without prejudice to the above, erred in computing the income\ntaxable at special rate at Rs 5,692,636,750 as against Rs.\n2,563,142,330 determined in the impugned order respectively and\nconsequently, computing higher tax liability;\n13. erred in short grant

MATRIX PARTNERS INDIA INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC,MAURITIUS vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Ms. Padmavathy S ()

274 read with Section 270A of the Act. The Appellant prays that the learned AO be directed to drop the penal proceedings under section 270A of the Act since the Appellant has made all disclosures in the income tax return, supported by legal arguments and judicial precedents at the time of assessment. 3. Levy of tax under section 115JB

EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INDEX MASTER FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY CIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

gains chargeable to tax against brought forward\nlong term capital loss in the computation sheet;\n12. Without prejudice to the above, erred in computing the income\ntaxable at special rate at Rs 5,692,636,750 as against Rs.\n2,563,142,330 determined in the impugned order respectively and\nconsequently, computing higher tax liability;\n13. erred in short grant

I SHARES ESG AWARE MSCI EM ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ) -2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

gains chargeable to tax against brought forward\nlong term capital loss in the computation sheet;\n12. Without prejudice to the above, erred in computing the income\ntaxable at special rate at Rs 5,692,636,750 as against Rs.\n2,563,142,330 determined in the impugned order respectively and\nconsequently, computing higher tax liability;\n13. erred in short grant

EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS INDIA EQUITY OPEN LIMITED,MAURITIUS vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE 2(2)(1) - MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S\Nshri Sandeep Singh Karhail\Nita No.1219/Mum/2025\N(Assessment Year :2022-2023)\Neastspring Investments India Equity\Nopen Ltd.,\N3Rd Floor, 355 Nex Rue Du Savoir,\Ncybercity Ebene, Mauritius\Npan - Aadcp4503H\Nappellant\Nv/S\Ndcit (It) – 2(2)(1),\Nroom No.606, 6Th Floor,\Nkautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C-43,\Ng-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex,\Nbandra (East), Mumbai\Nmaharashtra - 400051\Nrespondent\Nassessee By : Shri Ketan Ved\Nms. Riya Shah\Nrevenue By : Shri Satya Pal Kumar, Cit(Dr)\Ndate Of Hearing – 05/05/2025\Ndate Of Order – 09/05/2025\Norder\Nper Sandeep Singh Karhail, J.M.\Nthe Assessee Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Final Assessment\Norder Dated 27.12.2024, Passed Under Section 143(3) R.W. Section 144C(3)\Nof The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act\"), Pursuant To The Directions Dated\N30.11.2024 Issued By The Learned Dispute Resolution Panel-1, Mumbai,\N(“Learned Drp”) Under Section 144C(5) Of The Act, For The Assessment Year\N2022-23.\N2. In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds:\N“Re.: Disallowance Of Set-Off Of Brought Forward Short-Term Capital Losses\Nincurred On Equity Transactions That Were Subjected To Securities\Ntransaction Tax (Stt) Against Short Term Capital Gains On Sale Of Right\Nforms Not Subject To Stt\N1.

Capital Gains' in the return of income.\n3. 4. The Appellant submits that considering the facts and circumstances of\nits case, the learned DCIT has failed to appreciate that altering the order\nof setting off losses would not impact the total income of the assessee.\n3. 5. The Appellant submits that the learned DCIT be directed to delete the\nerroneous

UDAYAN GROVER,MUMBAI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE(NFAC), DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Bleudayan Grover V. National Faceless Appeal Centre Panch Mahal Delhi Panch Sristhi Complex {Acit – 26(3), Bkc, Mumbai} Powai, Mumbai - 400072 Pan: Aclpg0572G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shri Vimal Punmiya Department Represented By : Ms. Kavitha Kaushik

Capital Gains, the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income within the menaing of section 271(1)(c). Hence, penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) rws 274

BHAVANA LALIT JAIN,NAVI MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD-15(1)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shriraj Kumar Chauhan, Jm

capital gain filed the documentary evidence such as contract notes, confirmation of SEBI registered stockbrokers, purchase bills, payment receipt, share certificate, Demat statement, bank statements, rate publication of Bombay stock exchange, advertisement issued by the seller in newspaper and other documents. Though the assessee had made off market purchase of the shares, but the payment has been made through banking

ITO-28.3.1, NAVI MUMBAI vs. SEEMA NARENDRA BAPNA, NERUL

In the result both the grounds of appeal are dismissed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan, Jm A.Y.2014-15 Ito,28.3.1, Seema Narendra Bapna, Mumbai Flat No.A 2701, Plot No. R3 B Emerald Bay, Sector Vs. 14 Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Thane 400706

capital gain filed the documentary evidence such as contract notes, confirmation of SEBI registered stockbrokers, purchase bills, payment receipt, share certificate, Demat statement, bank statements, rate publication of Bombay stock exchange, advertisement issued by the seller in newspaper and other documents. Though the assessee had made off market purchase of the shares, but the payment has been made through banking

VANGUARD TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK INDEX FUNDQ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISATANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-4(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Hon’Ble

capital gains arising from sale of shares subjected to STT. 8. The learned ACIT erred in not following the binding decisions of the jurisdictional Tribunal and rejecting the set-off merely because the Department has preferred an I.T.A. No. 4656/Mum/2023 3 appeal before the jurisdictional High Court against one of the orders of the jurisdictional Tribunal. 9. Thus, the learned