DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4),MUMBAI., PRATISHTHA BHAVAN, MUMBAI. vs. ARUN SUBRAHMANYAM, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed”
ITA 2694/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 May 2024AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Gagan Goyal
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv KhandelwalFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha (SR.DR)
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 270A
capital gain. The revised computation was duly filed which is also enclosed in the assessee‟s paper book page 2. The Ld.AR further relied on the order of the Ld.CIT(A). The relevant para of page
9 is duly annexed herewith: -
“7.2 In this regard, during the course of appellate proceedings, the Ld. A.R. has argued that at the time
