ADDL CIT R G 7(1), MUMBAI vs. NOVARTIS INDIA LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS HINDUSTAN CIBA GIEGY LTD. ), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blem/S. Novartis India Limited V. Asst. Commissioner Of Income –Tax - 7(2)(2) {Earlier Addl. Commissioner Of Income –Tax – 7(1)} 6Th& 7Th Floor 1St Floor, Aayakar Bhavan Inspire Bkc M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 “G” Block, Bkc Main Road Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E) Mumbai – 400051 Pan: Aaach2914F (Appellant) (Respondent) Addl. Commissioner Of Income –Tax – 7(1) V. M/S. Novartis India Limited Room No. 622, Aayakar Bhavan {Earlier Known As Hindustan Ciba Giegy Ltd.,} Sandoz House, Dr. A.B. Road M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 Worli, Mumbai – 400018 Pan: Aaach2914F (Appellant) (Respondent) Co No.190/Mum/2011 [Arising Out Of Ita No.6772/Mum/2010 (A.Y. 2002-03)] M/S. Novartis India Limited V. Addl. Commissioner Of Income –Tax – 7(1)} Room No. 622, Aayakar Bhavan {Earlier Known As Hindustan Ciba Giegy Ltd.,} Sandoz House, Dr. A.B. Road M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 Worli, Mumbai – 400018 Pan: Aaach2914F (Appellant) (Respondent)

272A; or (d) an order passed by an Assessing Officer under sub-section (3), of section 143 or section 147or section 153A or section 153C in pursuance of the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel or an order passed under section 154 in respect of such order; (e) an order passed by an Assessing Officer under sub-section

MANJU RAKESH JAIN,MUMBAI vs. PCIT, MUMBAI-20, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Manju Rakesh Jain, Pcit, Mumbai-20 704-A, Highland Park, Lokhanwala 418, 4Th Floor, Piramal Chambers, Vs. Complex, Andheri West, Lalbaug, Parel, Mumbai-400058. Mumbai-400012. Pan No. Aaepj 9613 N Appellant Respondent

Gains' and 'Income from Other Sources'. The return was selected for scrutiny and the assessment was The return was selected for scrutiny and the assessment The return was selected for scrutiny and the assessment completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the completed under Section

BAO VALUE FUND,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAX, CIRCLE-1(2)(1), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

E R Per Padmavathy S, AM: This appeal by the assessee is against the final order of assessment passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International), Circle-1(2)(1), Mumbai [for short 'the AO] dated 03.01.2024 for the AY 2018-19. The assessee raised the following concise grounds of appeal:- “1. On the facts and circumstances

LALITA BHARATKUMAR JAIN,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 20(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

E R Per Bench: This bunch of three appeals of the assessee were filed against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter, ‘Ld.CIT(A)] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year 2017-18, date of order 27/02/2025 in respect of ITA 6129/Mum/2025; 11/07/2025 & 14/07/2025

LALITA BHARATKUMAR JAIN,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 20(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

E R Per Bench: This bunch of three appeals of the assessee were filed against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter, ‘Ld.CIT(A)] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year 2017-18, date of order 27/02/2025 in respect of ITA 6129/Mum/2025; 11/07/2025 & 14/07/2025

LALIT KUMAR MOHANLAL JAIN,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 20(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

E R Per Bench: This bunch of three appeals of the assessee were filed against the orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter, ‘Ld.CIT(A)] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year 2017-18, date of order 27/02/2025 in respect of ITA 6129/Mum/2025; 11/07/2025 & 14/07/2025

IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY PVT LTD,MUMBAI, INDIA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PCIT, MUMBAI-5, AYAKAR BHAVAN MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

e-proceedings, along-with all\nsupporting documents and evidences. If you wish to avail personal hearing, you are\nrequested to attend the hearing on 31.01.2024 at 11.30 a.m. at Room No. 515, 5th Floor,\nAayakar Bhavan, Mumbai either in person or through an authorized representative.\ncase of non-compliance on the stipulated date and time, it will be presumed that

FARHAN ABDUL KADIR SAYED ,MUMBAI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE , DELHI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2017-18

E R Per : Kuldip Singh, Judicial Member: The appellant, Mr. Farhan Abdul Sayed (hereinafter referred to as ‘the assessee’) by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 13.09.2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC) [Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi] (hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)] qua the assessment year

NITIN NARNHERAM PATEL,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A), NFAC, DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyalnitin Narbheram Patel Flat No.1702/1802, Wing-F, Pirojshah Nagar, Eastern Express Highway, Vikhroli (E) Mumbai-400 079 Pan: Aajpp4339A ...... Appellant Vs. Cit(A)/Nfac Mumbai- ..... Respondent

E) Mumbai-400 079 PAN: AAJPP4339A ...... Appellant Vs. CIT(A)/NFAC Mumbai- ..... Respondent Appellant by : Shri Ajay R. Singh Respondent by : Shri Chetan M. Kacha, Sr. AR Date of hearing : 10/04/2023 Date of pronouncement : 15/05/2023 ORDER PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M: This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (for short ‘NFAC’) dated