ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE EMERGING MARKETS MAURITIUS COMPANY ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TP) 2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadavshri Sandeep Singh Karhailishares Core Msci Emerging Markets Etf (As A Successor To Ishares Core Emerging Markets Mauritius Company) C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 17Th Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Marg, ............... Appellant Dadar (West), Mumbai - 400028 Pan : Aafci3337N V/S Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Tax) - 2(2)(2) Room No.606, 6Th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, ……………… Respondent C-41 To C-43, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 Ishares Msci All Country Asia Ex Japan Etf C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 17Th Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai - 400028 Pan : Aabti7439L ............... Appellant

gains arising on transactions subjected to STT and those not subjected to STT are no different and satisfy the 'similar computation' condition specified in section 70(2) of the Act; 3. failed to appreciate that since section 70 of the Act does not provide any hierarchy for set-off, the short-term capital loss arising from sale of shares subjected

ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN ETF,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

capital losses. The AO was directed to allow the exemption of such gains and the set off of losses against non-grandfathered gains.", "result": "Partly Allowed", "sections": [ "143(3)", "144C(13)", "144C(5)", "70(2)", "45", "55A", "111A", "115AD", "74", "2(24)", "4", "5", "90(2)", "13(4)", "234B", "270A

EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF TEXAS ,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

capital gain. 7. Erred in granting credit for taxes deducted at source only to the extent of INR 10,09,36,049 as against INR 106,223,167 as claimed by the Appellant in the return of income. 8. Erred in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act amounting to INR 26,946,836 and INR.583

FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST FIDELITY SAI EMERGING MARKETS INDEX FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(3)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

capital gain. 7. Erred in granting credit for taxes deducted at source only to the extent of INR 10,09,36,049 as against INR 106,223,167 as claimed by the Appellant in the return of income. 8. Erred in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act amounting to INR 26,946,836 and INR.583

ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN ETF(AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN MAURITIUS CO),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

capital losses\nadopted by the Appellant and thereby, taxing the gross short-term capital\ngains in respect of transactions on the sale of shares not chargeable to\nSecurities Transaction Tax ('STT\").\n3. failed to appreciate that income under the head 'Capital Gains' is determined\nas per sections 45 to 55A of the Act whilst sections 111A and 115AD only\nprovide

ISHARES CORE MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES MSCI INDIA UCITS ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order

ISHARES CORE MSCI TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES MSCI INDIA ETF(AS A SUCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA INDEX MARUITIUS COMPANY),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

SCHWAB EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -4(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD DIST ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

Capital losses adopted\nby the Appellant\n\n2. erred in rejecting the hierarchy of set-off of short-term capital losses\nadopted by the Appellant and thereby, taxing the gross short-term capital\ngains in respect of transactions on the sale of shares not chargeable to\nSecurities Transaction Tax (\"STT\"):\n3. failed to appreciate that income under the head 'Capital

ISHARES INDIA 50 ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

gains u/s\n111A amounting to Rs.88,08,601 twice and taxed at 15% with surcharge and\ncess in the computation sheet.\n9. Without prejudice to above, erred in not setting off the net long term capital\ngains chargeable to tax against brought forward long term capital loss in the\ncomputation sheet as done so in the impugned order.\n10. Without

ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES EMERGING MARKETS INDEX MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

Capital losses adopted\nby the Appellant\n2. erred in rejecting the hierarchy of set-off of short-term capital losses\nadopted by the Appellant and thereby, taxing the gross short-term capital\ngains in respect of transactions on the sale of shares not chargeable to\nSecurities Transaction Tax ('STT\"): \n3. failed to appreciate that income under the head 'Capital Gains

ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE EMERGING MARKETS MAURITIUS COMPANY),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

Capital Gains' is determined\nas per sections 45 to 55A of the Act whilst sections 111A and 115AD only\nprovide for determination of tax in certain cases and therefore, gains arising\non transactions subjected to STT and those not subjected to STT are no\ndifferent and satisfy the 'similar computation' condition specified in section

MORGAN STANLEY MAURITIUS COMPANY LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-CIRCLE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Morgan Stanley Mauritius Company Dy. Cit (International Taxation) – Ltd., Circle 3(2)(2), Vs. C/O S R B C & Associates Llp, 14Th 16Th Floor, Room No. 1615, Air India Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Building Nariman Point, Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400028. Pan No. Aadcm 5927 G Appellant Respondent

capital gains earned by the Appellant (prior to 1 April 2017) were exempt from tax under the Double ant (prior to 1 April 2017) were exempt from tax under the Double ant (prior to 1 April 2017) were exempt from tax under the Double Taxation avoidance agreement entered into between the Government of Taxation avoidance agreement entered into between

FIDELITY RUTLAND SQUARE TRUST II STRATEGIC ADVISERS EMERGING MARKETS FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

capital gains arising from sale of\nshares subjected to STT.\n4. Erred in not following the binding decisions of the\njurisdictional Tribunal and rejecting the set-off merely\nbecause the Department has preferred an appeal before\nthe jurisdictional High Court against one of the orders of\nthe jurisdictional Tribunal.\n5. Thus, the Ld. AO erred in raising a demand

FIDELITY RUTLAND SQUARE TRUST II STRATEGIC ADVISERS FID EMG MARKETS FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )2(3)(1), MUMBAI

capital gains arising from sale of\nshares subjected to STT.\nErred in not following the binding decisions of the\njurisdictional Tribunal and rejecting the set-off merely\nbecause the Department has preferred an appeal before\nthe jurisdictional High Court against one of the orders of\nthe jurisdictional Tribunal.\nThus, the Ld. AO erred in raising a demand

EMERGING MARKETS INDEX NON-LENDABLE FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

capital gains arising from sale of shares not subjected\nSTT in the computation sheet, which is not aligned with the directions\nissued by the DRP and the impugned order;\n6. erred in not granting the credit of taxes deducted amounting to Rs.\n1,492,492.\nGround of Appeal No. 9: Initiation of penal proceedings under section\n270A

EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INDEX MASTER FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY CIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

capital gains arising from sale of shares not subjected\nSTT in the computation sheet, which is not aligned with the directions\nissued by the DRP and the impugned order;\n6. erred in not granting the credit of taxes deducted amounting to Rs.\n1,492,492.\nGround of Appeal No. 9: Initiation of penal proceedings under section\n270A