ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE EMERGING MARKETS MAURITIUS COMPANY ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TP) 2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadavshri Sandeep Singh Karhailishares Core Msci Emerging Markets Etf (As A Successor To Ishares Core Emerging Markets Mauritius Company) C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 17Th Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Marg, ............... Appellant Dadar (West), Mumbai - 400028 Pan : Aafci3337N V/S Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Tax) - 2(2)(2) Room No.606, 6Th Floor, Kautilya Bhavan, ……………… Respondent C-41 To C-43, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051 Ishares Msci All Country Asia Ex Japan Etf C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 17Th Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai - 400028 Pan : Aabti7439L ............... Appellant

section 144C(13) of the Act computing the net short-term capital gains amounting to Rs. 950,33,72,269 taxable at 15

TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the question of law referred to the Special Bench is answered in favour of the assessee

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Arun Khodpiatata Communications Limited Pr. Cit, Videsh Sanchar Bhavan, Mumbai-1 Vs. M. G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Pan/Gir No. Aaacv 2808 C (Appellant) : (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri J. D. Mistri Respondent By : Shri Ritesh Misra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.09.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2025 O R D E R Per Saktijit Dey: The Present Appeal, At The Instance Of The Assessee, Assails Order Dated 21.03.2025, Passed U/S. 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ For Short), By Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (‘Ld. Pcit’ For Short), Pertaining To The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2018-19. 2. Though The Assessee Has Raised Multiple Grounds, Both On Jurisdictional Issues As Well As On Merits, However, There Is Consensus Between The Parties That The Appeal Can Be Decided On Merits, In Which Event, There Is No Need To Go Into Various Other Issues Raised In Appeal.

144C(13) of the Act. Post passing of final assessment order, ld. PCIT called for and examined the assessment records and while doing so, he found that in the year under consideration, the assessee has sold certain depreciable assets which has resulted in capital gain. He observed, as per section 50 of the Act, gain derived from sale of depreciable

FIDELITY SALEM STREET TRUST FIDELITY SAI EMERGING MARKETS INDEX FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(3)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

15 January 2025, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (International Tax)-2(2)(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AC'], under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act'), in pursuance of the directions under section 144C(5) of the Act issued by the Hon'ble Dispute Resolution

EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF TEXAS ,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT (INT. TAX)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

15 January 2025, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (International Tax)-2(2)(1), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AC'], under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act'), in pursuance of the directions under section 144C(5) of the Act issued by the Hon'ble Dispute Resolution

FIDELITY RUTLAND SQUARE TRUST II STRATEGIC ADVISERS EMERGING MARKETS FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), MUMBAI

The appeals are partly allowed

15%\n(STT paid)\nTaxable at 30%\n(Non-STT paid)\nShort-Term Capital Gains\n88,21,26.634\n2,67,46,584\nLess: Short-Term Capital Losses\n(67,17,89,654)\nNil\nNet Short-Term Capital Gains\n1,03,36,950\n2,67,46,584\n9. Being aggrieved, the Assessee has preferred the present appeal\nbefore the Tribunal

ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN ETF(AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES MSCI ALL COUNTRY ASIA EX JAPAN MAURITIUS CO),MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

15% under section 111A of the Act\nand the net short-term capital gains amounting to Rs.4,60,58,240 taxable at\n30% under section 115AD of the Act.\n7. The assessee filed detailed objections, inter-alia, against the aforesaid\naddition made by the AO. Vide directions dated 05/12/2024, issued under\nsection 144C

ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCESSOR TO ISHARES CORE EMERGING MARKETS MAURITIUS COMPANY),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

15% under section 111A of the Act\nand the net short-term capital gains amounting to Rs.4,60,58,240 taxable at\n30% under section 115AD of the Act.\n7.\nThe assessee filed detailed objections, inter-alia, against the aforesaid\naddition made by the AO. Vide directions dated 05/12/2024, issued under\nsection 144C

ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES EMERGING MARKETS INDEX MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

15% under section 111A of the Act\nand the net short-term capital gains amounting to Rs.4,60,58,240 taxable at\n30% under section 115AD of the Act.\n7. The assessee filed detailed objections, inter-alia, against the aforesaid\naddition made by the AO. Vide directions dated 05/12/2024, issued under\nsection 144C

ISHARES CORE MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INT)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

15% under section 111A of the Act\nand the net short-term capital gains amounting to Rs.4,60,58,240 taxable at\n30% under section 115AD of the Act.\n7.\nThe assessee filed detailed objections, inter-alia, against the aforesaid\naddition made by the AO. Vide directions dated 05/12/2024, issued under\nsection 144C

SCHWAB EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -4(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

15% under section 111A of the Act\nand the net short-term capital gains amounting to Rs.4,60,58,240 taxable at\n30% under section 115AD of the Act.\n7. The assessee filed detailed objections, inter-alia, against the aforesaid\naddition made by the AO. Vide directions dated 05/12/2024, issued under\nsection 144C

ISHARES INDIA 50 ETF (AS A SUCCESSOR TO ISHARES INDIA MAURITIUS CO ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

15% under section 111A of the Act\nand the net short-term capital gains amounting to Rs.4,60,58,240 taxable at\n30% under section 115AD of the Act.\n7.\nThe assessee filed detailed objections, inter-alia, against the aforesaid\naddition made by the AO. Vide directions dated 05/12/2024, issued under\nsection 144C

MORGAN STANLEY MAURITIUS COMPANY LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-CIRCLE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2020-21 Morgan Stanley Mauritius Company Dy. Cit (International Taxation) – Ltd., Circle 3(2)(2), Vs. C/O S R B C & Associates Llp, 14Th 16Th Floor, Room No. 1615, Air India Floor, The Ruby, 29, Senapati Bapat Building Nariman Point, Marg, Dadar (West), Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400028. Pan No. Aadcm 5927 G Appellant Respondent

144C(13) of the Act, is without jurisdiction and bad in law inasmuch as the same has been passed beyond the time limit inasmuch as the same has been passed beyond the time limit inasmuch as the same has been passed beyond the time limit prescribed in Section 153 of the Act. prescribed in Section

ISHARES MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD ACC,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

section 144C (5) of the act by the dispute resolution panel – 1, Mumbai (the learned DRP) dated 13/9/2023 wherein the return of income filed by the assessee on 11/3/2022 of ₹ 135,569,970/– was assessed at ₹ 135,569,970/- but where the assessee has paid tax on short- term capital gain at the rate of 15

ISHARES MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD DIST ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

section 144C (5) of the act by the dispute resolution panel – 1, Mumbai (the learned DRP) dated 13/9/2023 wherein the return of income filed by the assessee on 11/3/2022 of ₹ 135,569,970/– was assessed at ₹ 135,569,970/- but where the assessee has paid tax on short- term capital gain at the rate of 15

ISHARES EMSC MAURITIUS CO ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

section 144C (5) of the act by the dispute resolution panel – 1, Mumbai (the learned DRP) dated 13/9/2023 wherein the return of income filed by the assessee on 11/3/2022 of ₹ 135,569,970/– was assessed at ₹ 135,569,970/- but where the assessee has paid tax on short- term capital gain at the rate of 15

ISHARES MSCI EM IMI ESG SCREENED UCITS ETF,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

section 144C (5) of the act by the dispute resolution panel – 1, Mumbai (the learned DRP) dated 13/9/2023 wherein the return of income filed by the assessee on 11/3/2022 of ₹ 135,569,970/– was assessed at ₹ 135,569,970/- but where the assessee has paid tax on short- term capital gain at the rate of 15

ISHARES MSCI INDIA UCITS ETF,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

section 144C (5) of the act by the dispute resolution panel – 1, Mumbai (the learned DRP) dated 13/9/2023 wherein the return of income filed by the assessee on 11/3/2022 of ₹ 135,569,970/– was assessed at ₹ 135,569,970/- but where the assessee has paid tax on short- term capital gain at the rate of 15

FIDELITY RUTLAND SQUARE TRUST II STRATEGIC ADVISERS FID EMG MARKETS FUND ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )2(3)(1), MUMBAI

15%\n(STT paid)\nTaxable at 30%\n(Non-STT paid)\nShort-Term Capital Gains\nLess: Short-Term Capital Losses\n88,21,26.634\n(67,17,89,654)\n2,67,46,584\nNil\n\nNet Short-Term Capital Gains\n1,03,36,950\n2,67,46,584\n\n7.\n8.\n9.\nBeing aggrieved, the Assessee has preferred the present appeal

ACIT CIR 1, THANE vs. LANXESS INDIA P.LTD, THANE

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2009-10 Lanxess India Private Limited, Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lanxess House, Plot No. 162-164, Circle 1, Road No. 27, Wagle Estate, Opp. Iti Vs. 6Th Floor, Asher It Park, Road No. College, Midc, 16-Z, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane-(West)-400604. Thane. Pan No. Aaccb 3880 A Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2009-10 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Lanxess India Private Limited, Circle 1, Lanxess House, Plot No. 162-164, 6Th Floor, Asher It Park, Road No. 16- Vs. Road No. 27, Wagle Estate, Opp. Iti Z, Wagle Industrial Estate, College, Midc, Thane. Thane-(West)-400604 Pan No. Aaccb 3880 A Appellant Respondent

144C is to be followed with effect from 01/10/2009. In the instant case, though followed with effect from 01/10/2009. In the instant case, though followed with effect from 01/10/2009. In the instant case, though the assessment year involve the assessment year involve is 2009-10, the draft assessment order 10, the draft assessment order has been issued on 28/03/2013, much