BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 142A(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi25Chandigarh12Jaipur11Kolkata7Nagpur7Bangalore7Raipur6Mumbai5Chennai5Lucknow5Indore4Hyderabad3Rajkot2Pune2Surat1Cochin1Cuttack1Jabalpur1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 14815Section 1519Section 43C7Section 56(2)(vii)7Section 1476Section 143(3)3Section 55A3Reassessment3Reopening of Assessment3

ACC LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3135/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

6 ITA NO.3135& 3136/MUM/2019 (A.Y: 2009-10) M/s. ACC Limited by assessee in return of income based upon registered valuer’s report. On perusal of reasons’ recorded, it is apparent that AO has issued notice u/s 148 of the Act based upon such DVO’s report and no other evidences are available with Assessing Officer to justify reassessment proceedings

ACC LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

Addition to Income2
ITA 3136/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

6 ITA NO.3135& 3136/MUM/2019 (A.Y: 2009-10) M/s. ACC Limited by assessee in return of income based upon registered valuer’s report. On perusal of reasons’ recorded, it is apparent that AO has issued notice u/s 148 of the Act based upon such DVO’s report and no other evidences are available with Assessing Officer to justify reassessment proceedings

DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI vs. ACC LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3176/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

6 ITA NO.3135& 3136/MUM/2019 (A.Y: 2009-10) M/s. ACC Limited by assessee in return of income based upon registered valuer’s report. On perusal of reasons’ recorded, it is apparent that AO has issued notice u/s 148 of the Act based upon such DVO’s report and no other evidences are available with Assessing Officer to justify reassessment proceedings

GAURAV RAJESH DESAI ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD -3(2), MUMBAI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 675/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C V Bhadang & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Ajay R. Singh / AkshayFor Respondent: Shri Swapnil Choudhary, Sr.DR
Section 250Section 56(2)(vii)

6. We heard the parties and perused the material on record. We notice that the Hon'ble Supreme Court while considering the issue of condoning the delay in filing the appeal in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji and Ors. (167 ITR 471) has laid certain principles and one of the said principles is that there

GOODWILL CONSTRUCTIONS,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, , THANE

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 3233/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Jun 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms Padmavathy S, Am & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Subodh Ratnaparkhi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Parwani, Sr. DR
Section 142A(1)Section 43C

142A(1) of the Act to the Valuation Officer based on the valuation report determining the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the property the AO proposed to make an addition of Rs. 24,47,250/-. The assessee submitted before the AO that the sale value has been re-determined without placing any material or evidence on record that the amount