GRACEUNITED DEVELOPES PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 12(2)(1), MUMBA

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

section 148 of the Act, vide Ack. no. 345386641270421 on 27/04/2021.\n2.\nWhile acknowledging the care and diligence you have taken in preparing the return, there\nare certain issues as mentioned below which need further clarification:-\nIssues as per reasons recorded for reopening\n/s. GRACEUNITED DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED\nPAN: AACCG6261E FOR A.Y 2013-14;\nREASONS FOR REOPENING\n1. Brief details

GRACEUNITED DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 12(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble

13A (12)(2)(1), Mumbai Vs Siddharth Nagar, Khatau Mill Compound WE Highway, Borivali East Mumbai - 400066 [PAN: AACCG6261E] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Suchek Anchaliya, C.A. & Vaishali More, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj Ramesh, Sr. D/R सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 05/03/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 12/03/2025 आदेश

GRACEUNITED DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, 12(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble

13A (12)(2)(1), Mumbai Vs Siddharth Nagar, Khatau Mill Compound WE Highway, Borivali East Mumbai - 400066 [PAN: AACCG6261E] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Suchek Anchaliya, C.A. & Vaishali More, C.A. Revenue by : Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj Ramesh, Sr. D/R सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 05/03/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 12/03/2025 आदेश

ASHUTOSH GIRISH BHARKHADA ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 41(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Smt. Renu Jauhri ()

Section 143(1) of the Act. 4. On the facts and in law, the Assessing officer has erred in disallowance of claimed made u/s 10(13A) being allowance to meet expenditure incurred on house rent at Rs. 2,17,760/-. 5. On the facts and in law, the Assessing officer states that "Exempt Allowance u/s 10(13A) is more than