SHRI KASHINATH TAPURIAH,KOLKATTA vs. DY.CIT.C.C.2, MUMBAI
In the result, the penalty appeals for all the seven years under reference are allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 3820/MUM/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Apr 2016AY 2006-07
Bench: Shri D. Manmohan, Vp & Shri Sanjay Arora, Am Sr. Appellant Respondent A.Ys.
For Appellant: Shri Chetan Karia &For Respondent: Shri Girish Dave &
Section 132(1)Section 132ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)
132B) for a specific purpose, i.e., laying down a complete procedure for search and seizure; the power of the relevant authorities, and confiscation of the assets seized. The material seized though could be used as a piece of evidence in any proceedings under the Act, with section 132(4) itself so providing.
That is, the provisions of sections