Search: bogus purchases

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad14 Jaipur10 Mumbai4 Surat2 Chandigarh1 Pune1 Raipur1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 143(3)5 Section 684 Section 14A3 Addition to Income3 Bogus Purchases3 Penalty3 Section 132(1)2 Section 271(1)(C)2

DY CIT CC 4 (1), MUMBAI vs. CENTAUR MERCHANTILE PVT LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 324/MUM/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya (Am) & Shri Ravish Sood (Jm)

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

D E R Per Shamim Yahya (AM) :- These are Revenue’s appeals directed against respective orders of learned CIT(A) for respective assessment years. 2. Since the issues are common and connected and the appeals were heard together, these have been consolidated and disposed off together for the sake of convenience. 3. Since, grounds are identical, we are referring

ITO 3(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. SATYA SECURITIES LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the present appeal is partly allowed

DY CIT CC 4 (1), MUMBAI vs. CENTAUR MERCHANTILE PVT LTD., MUMBAI

ITO 3(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. SATYA SECURITIES LTD, MUMBAI

DY CIT CC 4 (1), MUMBAI vs. CENTAUR MERCHANTILE PVT LTD., MUMBAI

ITO 3(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. SATYA SECURITIES LTD, MUMBAI

SHORLINE HOTEL P. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT- CC-1(2), MUMBAI

SHRI RAJENDRA P. JAIN ,MUMBAI vs. DYCIT, CENTRAL CIR.-1(3), MUMBAI