BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

44 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 65Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin57Mumbai44Delhi35Chennai23Hyderabad14Visakhapatnam9Chandigarh8Bangalore7Indore5Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 13238Addition to Income33Section 69A32Section 69C24Section 143(3)19Survey u/s 133A18Section 153A16Disallowance14Section 153C13

VARDHA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue vide ITA Nos

ITA 2439/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2024AY 2017-18
Section 132Section 153CSection 37Section 68Section 69C

bogus and non-genuine accommodation entries. During the year\nthe aseeessee had made following transactions with such entities:\nSl. No\nParty Name\nAmount\n1\nAAKAARS\n2,68,040\n2\nAKAR MARBLE IND\n13,99,031\n3\nAKAR MARBLE & GRANITE\n30,35,241\n4\nANKIT PAINTS\n7,49,546\n5\nFALGUNI ENTERPRISES\n3,54,170\n6\nGENESIS SYSTEMS & SOLUTION

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. PANKAJ DHANJI GOSHAR, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed and both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 44 · Page 1 of 3

Section 132(4)11
Section 19
Search & Seizure9
ITA 1224/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Dec 2024AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Neelkanth Khandelwal For Revenue : Ms.Rajeshwari Menon, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Ms.Rajeshwari Menon, Sr.DR
Section 10(38)Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 69C

bogus. The Hon'ble High Court, affirmed the decision of the Tribunal wherein it was found that the chain of transactions entered into by the assessee have been proved, accounted for, documented and supported by evidence. It was also found that the assessee produced the contract notes, details of demat accounts and produced documents showing all payments were received

MAHADHAN AGRITECH LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SMARTCHEM TECHNOLOGIES LTD ,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEAL)--50, MUMAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2229/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 115JSection 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

bogus expenditure has to be adjusted to reflect the correct position. Thus, the depreciation disallowance is correct. Issue No. 7 – Disallowance of Deduction claimed u/s 35AD (i) Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO on the alleged reason that as per Section 35AD(7A), the assets should be exclusively used for specified business and the assessee condition. Further

MAHADHAN AGRITECH LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SMARTECH TECHNOLOGIES LTD ,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-MUMBAI.50, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2227/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 115JSection 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

bogus expenditure has to be adjusted to reflect the correct position. Thus, the depreciation disallowance is correct. Issue No. 7 – Disallowance of Deduction claimed u/s 35AD (i) Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO on the alleged reason that as per Section 35AD(7A), the assets should be exclusively used for specified business and the assessee condition. Further

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 8(1), MUMBAI vs. MAHADHAN AGRITECH LIMITED, PUNE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3569/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 115JSection 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

bogus expenditure has to be adjusted to reflect the correct position. Thus, the depreciation disallowance is correct. Issue No. 7 – Disallowance of Deduction claimed u/s 35AD (i) Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO on the alleged reason that as per Section 35AD(7A), the assets should be exclusively used for specified business and the assessee condition. Further

MAHADHAN AGRITECH LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SMARTCHEM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ),MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE -8(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3937/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 115JSection 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

bogus expenditure has to be adjusted to reflect the correct position. Thus, the depreciation disallowance is correct. Issue No. 7 – Disallowance of Deduction claimed u/s 35AD (i) Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO on the alleged reason that as per Section 35AD(7A), the assets should be exclusively used for specified business and the assessee condition. Further

ACIT CC 6(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3998/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

ACIT, CC-6(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3995/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMTIED ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 6(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4044/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

ACIT, CC 6(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4320/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

ACIT, CC-6(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4318/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

ACIT, CC 6(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4319/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

ACIT, CC 6(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4321/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMTIED ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 6(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4043/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -6 , MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4045/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Kothari and Shri Ronak Vasavada, CAsFor Respondent: Shri R. A. Dhyani, CIT DR and Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 1

bogus loss in the books of the Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. AYs 2011-12, 2015-16 to 2017-18 and 2019-20 to 2022-23 assessee so as to safeguard the property from auction owing to defaults in repayment of Standard Chartered Loan. Further, ld. Assessing Officer also alleged that block of assets had not ceased to exist

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3), MUMBAI , MUMBAI vs. VARDHA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue vide ITA Nos

ITA 3141/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Ankush Kapoor, CIT/DR
Section 132Section 153CSection 37Section 69C

bogus and non-genuine accommodation entries. During the year the aseeessee had made following transactions with such entities: Sl. No Party Name Amount 1 AAKAARS 2,68,040 2 AKAR MARBLE IND 13,99,031 3 AKAR MARBLE & GRANITE 30,35,241 4 ANKIT PAINTS 7,49,546 5 FALGUNI ENTERPRISES 3,54,170 6 GENESIS SYSTEMS & SOLUTION

VARDHA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue vide ITA Nos

ITA 2435/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Ankush Kapoor, CIT/DR
Section 132Section 153CSection 37Section 69C

bogus and non-genuine accommodation entries. During the year the aseeessee had made following transactions with such entities: Sl. No Party Name Amount 1 AAKAARS 2,68,040 2 AKAR MARBLE IND 13,99,031 3 AKAR MARBLE & GRANITE 30,35,241 4 ANKIT PAINTS 7,49,546 5 FALGUNI ENTERPRISES 3,54,170 6 GENESIS SYSTEMS & SOLUTION

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3), MUMBAI , MUMBAI vs. VARDHA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue vide ITA Nos

ITA 3142/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Ankush Kapoor, CIT/DR
Section 132Section 153CSection 37Section 69C

bogus and non-genuine accommodation entries. During the year the aseeessee had made following transactions with such entities: Sl. No Party Name Amount 1 AAKAARS 2,68,040 2 AKAR MARBLE IND 13,99,031 3 AKAR MARBLE & GRANITE 30,35,241 4 ANKIT PAINTS 7,49,546 5 FALGUNI ENTERPRISES 3,54,170 6 GENESIS SYSTEMS & SOLUTION

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(3), MUMBAI , MUMBAI vs. VARDHA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue vide ITA Nos

ITA 3140/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Ankush Kapoor, CIT/DR
Section 132Section 153CSection 37Section 69C

bogus and non-genuine accommodation entries. During the year the aseeessee had made following transactions with such entities: Sl. No Party Name Amount 1 AAKAARS 2,68,040 2 AKAR MARBLE IND 13,99,031 3 AKAR MARBLE & GRANITE 30,35,241 4 ANKIT PAINTS 7,49,546 5 FALGUNI ENTERPRISES 3,54,170 6 GENESIS SYSTEMS & SOLUTION

VARDHA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 4(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue vide ITA Nos

ITA 2437/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Ankush Kapoor, CIT/DR
Section 132Section 153CSection 37Section 69C

bogus and non-genuine accommodation entries. During the year the aseeessee had made following transactions with such entities: Sl. No Party Name Amount 1 AAKAARS 2,68,040 2 AKAR MARBLE IND 13,99,031 3 AKAR MARBLE & GRANITE 30,35,241 4 ANKIT PAINTS 7,49,546 5 FALGUNI ENTERPRISES 3,54,170 6 GENESIS SYSTEMS & SOLUTION