BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 44Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi15Mumbai2Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)8Section 36(1)(vii)4Section 41(1)4Section 2502Section 22Section 36(1)(viii)2Deduction2Depreciation2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

STATE BANK OF MYSORE,BANGALORE vs. JCIT, BANGALORE

ITA 661/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C V Bhadang & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved & Ninad PatadeFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray, Spl. Counsel
Section 2Section 250Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 41(1)

44A)/8/64-ITJ] dt. 21.10.1965 was issued in respect of the method to be followed for calculating the limit in Rule 88 with regard to "initial contribution" and the conditions applicable for later "lumpsum contribution." In the appellant's case Rule 88 is not applicable since the fund in question is already in existence through the "initial contributions" made when

DY..C.I.T., BANGALORE vs. M/S STATE BANK OF MYSORE, BANGALORE

ITA 684/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C V Bhadang & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved & Ninad PatadeFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray, Spl. Counsel
Section 2Section 250Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 41(1)

44A)/8/64-ITJ] dt. 21.10.1965 was issued in respect of the method to be followed for calculating the limit in Rule 88 with regard to "initial contribution" and the conditions applicable for later "lumpsum contribution." In the appellant's case Rule 88 is not applicable since the fund in question is already in existence through the "initial contributions" made when