Search: bogus purchases

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 35Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6 Rajkot5 Delhi4 Hyderabad4 Visakhapatnam2 Nagpur1 Jaipur1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8 Section 35D8 Section 36(1)(viia)8 Deduction6 Disallowance6 Section 36(1)(vii)4 Section 41(1)4 Reassessment4 Section 2502 Section 2

STATE BANK OF MYSORE,BANGALORE vs. JCIT, BANGALORE

ITA 661/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C V Bhadang & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved & Ninad PatadeFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray, Spl. Counsel

Section 2Section 250Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 41(1)

purchase during the year?" 3. Question No. i arises out of the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in remanding the issue before the Assessing Officer for proper verification of facts. The record would suggest that the assessee, in view of its success before the Tribunal on the issue of disallowance of interest credited to Interest Suspense Account

STATE BANK OF MYSORE,BANGALORE vs. JCIT, BANGALORE

STATE BANK OF MYSORE,BANGALORE vs. JCIT, BANGALORE

DY..C.I.T., BANGALORE vs. M/S STATE BANK OF MYSORE, BANGALORE

ULTRA TECH CEMENT LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT- CC 1(4), MUMBAI

M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENT CIR-1(4) , MUMBAI

DCIT CIR 1(4) , MUMBAI vs. M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD, MUMBAI

JT. CIT (ODS) - CC -1(4), MUMBAI vs. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD., MUMBAI