BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi7Kolkata5Indore3Chennai3Jaipur2Cuttack2Mumbai2

Key Topics

Section 271B5Section 271E4Section 269T3Section 1482Penalty2Addition to Income2

JIGNESH SURESH SHAH,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD,1,, THANE

ITA 5151/MUM/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 271Section 271B

bogus purchases. The AO also initiated penalty proceeding under section 271B for failure to get account audited. 3. The AO subsequently issued a penalty notice under section 271B of the Act and issued show-cause notice dated 22.12.2017. In response, the assessee submitted that “With reference to your notice, regarding penalty proceedings u/s 271 B of the income

MITA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDLL. CIT - CC - 3, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1817/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Mumbai
20 Apr 2023
AY 2014-15
Section 269TSection 271E

purchases. For the years relevant to A Ys 2007-08, 2009-10 and 2010- 11, the said lender offered undisclosed income of Rs. 55.73 lakhs in response to notices issued u/s 1534. Since, there was no compliance in course of the search related assessment proceedings, the AO adopted a profit margin of 2.19% as disclosed in the case