BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi9Mumbai4Kolkata4Chennai3Indore3Cuttack2Jaipur1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271B5Section 271E4Addition to Income4Section 269T3Section 41(1)2Section 1482Penalty2

JIGNESH SURESH SHAH,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD,1,, THANE

ITA 5151/MUM/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 271Section 271B

bogus purchases. The AO also initiated penalty proceeding under section 271B for failure to get account audited. 3. The AO subsequently issued a penalty notice under section 271B of the Act and issued show-cause notice dated 22.12.2017. In response, the assessee submitted that “With reference to your notice, regarding penalty proceedings u/s 271 B of the income

DY CIT -14(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. AYG REALTY LTD., MUMBAI

In the result there is no cause of grievance made out by the assessee on which this tribunal can adjudicate hence, challenging the initiation itself is not allowed hence, found to be infructuous

ITA 476/MUM/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyaldy.Cit-14(1)(1), Room No. 432, 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020. ..... Appellant Vs. M/S Ayg Realty Ltd., No. 1, Rajkamal, Cst Road, Kalina, Mumbai-400098. Pan: Aaacc4637J ...... Respondent Choudhury & Choudhury India Ltd. (Now Known As Ayg Realty Pvt. Ltd.), No. 1, Rajkamal, Cst Road, Kalina, Mumbai-400098. Pan: Aaacc4637J ...... Appellant Vs. The Cit (Appeals)-22, Room No. 513, 5Th Floor, Earnest House, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ..... Respondent Assessee By : Sh. Firoz Andhyarujina & Sh. Manek Andhyarujina Revenue By : Sh. Mehul Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 26/05/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 28/07/2022

For Appellant: Sh. Firoz Andhyarujina &For Respondent: Sh. Mehul Jain, Sr. DR
Section 41(1)

bogus bills. In view of all these facts, the addition made by the AO amounting to Rs.1,12,41,367/- being 20% of outstanding balance of sundry creditors for material purchased and Rs.3,02,46,494/- being 20% of outstanding balance of Sundry Creditors for Expenditure cannot be sustained and the entire addition of Rs.4,14,87,861/- done

CHOUDHURY & CHOUDHURY INDIA LTD. ( NOW KNOWN AS AYG REALTY P. LTD.),MUMBAI vs. CIT (APPEAL)-22, MUMBAI

In the result there is no cause of grievance made out by the assessee on which this tribunal can adjudicate hence, challenging the initiation itself is not allowed hence, found to be infructuous

ITA 1558/MUM/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyaldy.Cit-14(1)(1), Room No. 432, 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020. ..... Appellant Vs. M/S Ayg Realty Ltd., No. 1, Rajkamal, Cst Road, Kalina, Mumbai-400098. Pan: Aaacc4637J ...... Respondent Choudhury & Choudhury India Ltd. (Now Known As Ayg Realty Pvt. Ltd.), No. 1, Rajkamal, Cst Road, Kalina, Mumbai-400098. Pan: Aaacc4637J ...... Appellant Vs. The Cit (Appeals)-22, Room No. 513, 5Th Floor, Earnest House, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. ..... Respondent Assessee By : Sh. Firoz Andhyarujina & Sh. Manek Andhyarujina Revenue By : Sh. Mehul Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 26/05/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 28/07/2022

For Appellant: Sh. Firoz Andhyarujina &For Respondent: Sh. Mehul Jain, Sr. DR
Section 41(1)

bogus bills. In view of all these facts, the addition made by the AO amounting to Rs.1,12,41,367/- being 20% of outstanding balance of sundry creditors for material purchased and Rs.3,02,46,494/- being 20% of outstanding balance of Sundry Creditors for Expenditure cannot be sustained and the entire addition of Rs.4,14,87,861/- done

MITA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDLL. CIT - CC - 3, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1817/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Apr 2023AY 2014-15
Section 269TSection 271E

purchases. For the years relevant to A Ys 2007-08, 2009-10 and 2010- 11, the said lender offered undisclosed income of Rs. 55.73 lakhs in response to notices issued u/s 1534. Since, there was no compliance in course of the search related assessment proceedings, the AO adopted a profit margin of 2.19% as disclosed in the case