BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Rajkot12Mumbai7Jaipur3Patna3Chandigarh2Delhi1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 271B23Section 271A18Bogus Purchases7Penalty7Limitation/Time-bar6Condonation of Delay6Section 1482

JIGNESH SURESH SHAH,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD,1,, THANE

ITA 5151/MUM/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 271Section 271B

bogus purchases. The AO also initiated penalty proceeding under section 271B for failure to get account audited. 3. The AO subsequently issued a penalty notice under section 271B of the Act and issued show-cause notice dated 22.12.2017. In response, the assessee submitted that “With reference to your notice, regarding penalty proceedings u/s 271 B of the income

M/S HINGLAJ METALS & ALLOYS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT(A)-NFAC DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos 2805 to 2810/MUM/2022

ITA 2806/MUM/2022[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Mumbai
28 Feb 2023
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Gagan Goyal आअसं. 2805 से 2810 /मुं/ 2022 ("न.व. 2009-10 से 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Dharmil A. JhaveriFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand
Section 271ASection 271B

271A and under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’] in the respective assessment years. 2 ITA NO. 2805 TO 2810/MUM/2022(A.Y.2009-10 TO 2011-12) 2. Since, these appeals arise from identical set of facts all these appeals are taken up together for adjudication and are decided by this common order. 3. These appeals

M/S HINGLAJ METALS & ALLOYS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT(A)-NFAC DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos 2805 to 2810/MUM/2022

ITA 2807/MUM/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Gagan Goyal आअसं. 2805 से 2810 /मुं/ 2022 ("न.व. 2009-10 से 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Dharmil A. JhaveriFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand
Section 271ASection 271B

271A and under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’] in the respective assessment years. 2 ITA NO. 2805 TO 2810/MUM/2022(A.Y.2009-10 TO 2011-12) 2. Since, these appeals arise from identical set of facts all these appeals are taken up together for adjudication and are decided by this common order. 3. These appeals

M/S HINGLAJ METALS & ALLOYS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT(A)-NFAC DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos 2805 to 2810/MUM/2022

ITA 2805/MUM/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Gagan Goyal आअसं. 2805 से 2810 /मुं/ 2022 ("न.व. 2009-10 से 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Dharmil A. JhaveriFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand
Section 271ASection 271B

271A and under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’] in the respective assessment years. 2 ITA NO. 2805 TO 2810/MUM/2022(A.Y.2009-10 TO 2011-12) 2. Since, these appeals arise from identical set of facts all these appeals are taken up together for adjudication and are decided by this common order. 3. These appeals

M/S HINGLAJ METALS & ALLOYS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT(A)-NFAC DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos 2805 to 2810/MUM/2022

ITA 2809/MUM/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Gagan Goyal आअसं. 2805 से 2810 /मुं/ 2022 ("न.व. 2009-10 से 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Dharmil A. JhaveriFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand
Section 271ASection 271B

271A and under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’] in the respective assessment years. 2 ITA NO. 2805 TO 2810/MUM/2022(A.Y.2009-10 TO 2011-12) 2. Since, these appeals arise from identical set of facts all these appeals are taken up together for adjudication and are decided by this common order. 3. These appeals

M/S HINGLAJ METALS & ALLOYS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT(A)-NFAC DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos 2805 to 2810/MUM/2022

ITA 2810/MUM/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Gagan Goyal आअसं. 2805 से 2810 /मुं/ 2022 ("न.व. 2009-10 से 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Dharmil A. JhaveriFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand
Section 271ASection 271B

271A and under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’] in the respective assessment years. 2 ITA NO. 2805 TO 2810/MUM/2022(A.Y.2009-10 TO 2011-12) 2. Since, these appeals arise from identical set of facts all these appeals are taken up together for adjudication and are decided by this common order. 3. These appeals

M/S HINGLAJ METALS & ALLOYS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT(A)-NFAC DELHI, DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos 2805 to 2810/MUM/2022

ITA 2808/MUM/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Gagan Goyal आअसं. 2805 से 2810 /मुं/ 2022 ("न.व. 2009-10 से 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Dharmil A. JhaveriFor Respondent: Shri Tejinder Pal Singh Anand
Section 271ASection 271B

271A and under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’] in the respective assessment years. 2 ITA NO. 2805 TO 2810/MUM/2022(A.Y.2009-10 TO 2011-12) 2. Since, these appeals arise from identical set of facts all these appeals are taken up together for adjudication and are decided by this common order. 3. These appeals