BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore11Jaipur8Mumbai6Nagpur6Raipur5Kolkata3Panaji3Delhi2Hyderabad1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 69C9Section 1477Section 2507Addition to Income6Section 143(3)4Section 194H3Section 1483Section 69A3Bogus Purchases3

RANJANBEN CHUNILAL GADA,MUMBAI vs. TIO 34(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5842/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri B.V. Jhaveri,ARFor Respondent: Shri Umashankar Prasad, (CIT DR)
Section 147Section 148ASection 246ASection 250Section 69ASection 69C

246A against the Order U/S 147 r.w.s\n1448 dated 18-05-2023 making addition of Rs.69,67,752/- U/S 69A and\nRs.1,39,355/- U/S 69C in spite of the fact that-\n(i) The information received by the Assessing Officer from INSIGHT\nPORTAL is non-specific and general information lacking any specific\ninformation about the Assessee

Section 402
Reassessment2
Natural Justice2

BINAL VIKASH BHARDWAJ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 4(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 3461/MUM/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 69C

246A before CIT(A). The CIT(A) vide order dated 07.10.2015 had deleted entire addition made on account of bogus purchases. The department had filed appeal against the order of CIT(A) before ITAT. The ITAT vide order dated 08.11.2017 restore the matter to the file of AO for adjudicating 'de novo' with proper appreciation of facts. The appellant

BINAL VIKASH BHARDWAJ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 4(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 3462/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 69C

246A before CIT(A). The CIT(A) vide order dated 07.10.2015 had deleted entire addition made on account of bogus purchases. The department had filed appeal against the order of CIT(A) before ITAT. The ITAT vide order dated 08.11.2017 restore the matter to the file of AO for adjudicating 'de novo' with proper appreciation of facts. The appellant

JAGRAM TEGIRAM YADAV,MUMBAI vs. WARD 41.1.2, MUMBAI

ITA 7149/MUM/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Jan 2026AY 2019-2020
Section 147Section 148Section 69C

bogus purchases. It was the submission by Ld. AR that\nall the purchases are genuine for which necessary evidence were also produced\nbefore the Authorities below, therefore the entire addition is liable to be deleted.\n7. Per contra, ld. Sr. DR representing the revenue submitted that the\nassessee was unable to submit details like name of driver, transportation\npayment, delivery

SANJAY NARENDRA BANSAL ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 8(2)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 7123/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250

section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 on 26.12.2018 for the AY 2014-15 making addition of Rs. 23,71,500/- on account of bogus purchases from M/s Man Diamonds. The assessee challenged the aforesaid addition before the ld. CIT(A) however the assessee remained non-compliant before the ld. CIT(A) for the reasons clarified in petition of condonation of delay

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO SPICE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED),MUMBAI vs. DY. CIT, CIRCLE- 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3425/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Is Interconnected With Ground No.Ii. Hence, They Are Taken Up Together For Disposal.

Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40Section 40a

purchase of prepaid cards. Only after the resale of those prepaid cards, distributors would derive income. At the time of the assessee selling these pre-paid cards, he is not in possession of any income belonging to the distributor. Therefore, the question of any income accruing or arising to the distributor at the point of time of sale of prepaid