WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3 (1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

DCIT - CC 3(1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

WIND WORLD INDIA LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITEAD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3 (1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

WIND WORLD INDIA LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3 (1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

DCIT - CC 3 (1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

WIND WORLD INDIA LIMITEAD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), MUMBAI vs. WIND WORLD INDIA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA number

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

15 March 2013, therein; it was pointed out that purchase worth ₹266,57,822,87,822/- were made during the financial year 2006-07 to 2012-13 in the books purchase. The Managing Director (MD) agreed that purchase were not verified and further the MD tabulated the expenditure for several years. 03. Meanwhile, assessee filed an application for settlement

DCIT-3(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. RELCON INFRAPROJECTS LTD., MUMBAI

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

bogus purchases 13,00,68,426 2. Addition of cash credit under Section 68 of the Act 2,06,16,167 Total additions/disallowance 15

DCIT-3(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. RELCON INFRAPROJECTS LTD., MUMBAI

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

bogus purchases 13,00,68,426 2. Addition of cash credit under Section 68 of the Act 2,06,16,167 Total additions/disallowance 15

DCIT-3(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. RELCON INFRAPROJECTS LTD., MUMBAI

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

bogus purchases 13,00,68,426 2. Addition of cash credit under Section 68 of the Act 2,06,16,167 Total additions/disallowance 15

DCIT-3(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. RELCON INFRAPROJECTS LTD., MUMBAI

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

bogus purchases 13,00,68,426 2. Addition of cash credit under Section 68 of the Act 2,06,16,167 Total additions/disallowance 15

DCIT-3(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. RELCON INFRAPROJECTS LTD., MUMBAI

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

bogus purchases 13,00,68,426 2. Addition of cash credit under Section 68 of the Act 2,06,16,167 Total additions/disallowance 15

DCIT 3(1)(1),MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. RELCON INFRAPROJECTS LTD, MUMBAI

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

bogus purchases 13,00,68,426 2. Addition of cash credit under Section 68 of the Act 2,06,16,167 Total additions/disallowance 15

DCIT-3(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. RELCON INFRAPROJECTS LTD., MUMBAI

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

bogus purchases 13,00,68,426 2. Addition of cash credit under Section 68 of the Act 2,06,16,167 Total additions/disallowance 15

BHARAT DE vs. HI DAGHA,THANEVS.ITO WARD 3(1), KALYAN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Bharat Devshi Dagha, Ito, Ward 3(1), 3/13, Geet Govind Chs. Rani Mansion Manpada Road, Vs. Maharashtra-421301. Dombivli East-421 201. Pan No. Aarpd 9399 Q Appellant Respondent

15 appeals related to bogus purchases (appeal of M/s Chhabi Electrical Pvt Limited ITA No. 795/PUN/2014(Pune Tribunal) Chhabi Electrical Pvt Limited ITA No. 795/PUN/2014(Pune Tribunal) Chhabi Electrical Pvt Limited ITA No. 795/PUN/2014(Pune Tribunal) being the lead case). In this case, vide decision dated 28/04/2017, being the lead case). In this case, vide decision dated 28/04/2017, being

BHARAT DE vs. HI DAGHA,THANEVS.ITO WARD 3(1), KALYAN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Bharat Devshi Dagha, Ito, Ward 3(1), 3/13, Geet Govind Chs. Rani Mansion Manpada Road, Vs. Maharashtra-421301. Dombivli East-421 201. Pan No. Aarpd 9399 Q Appellant Respondent

15 appeals related to bogus purchases (appeal of M/s Chhabi Electrical Pvt Limited ITA No. 795/PUN/2014(Pune Tribunal) Chhabi Electrical Pvt Limited ITA No. 795/PUN/2014(Pune Tribunal) Chhabi Electrical Pvt Limited ITA No. 795/PUN/2014(Pune Tribunal) being the lead case). In this case, vide decision dated 28/04/2017, being the lead case). In this case, vide decision dated 28/04/2017, being