BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

566 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 153A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai566Delhi410Jaipur131Chennai121Bangalore112Chandigarh72Hyderabad63Cochin57Visakhapatnam43Kolkata39Amritsar38Guwahati30Allahabad28Ahmedabad26Pune26Nagpur20Rajkot16Surat16Agra14Lucknow13Jodhpur12Raipur12Indore12Patna9Ranchi9Dehradun5Jabalpur2Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 153A95Section 143(3)78Addition to Income72Section 153C65Section 13255Section 14737Section 6835Section 69C35Disallowance30

SUDESH DHANRAJ MURPANA (HUF),MUMBAI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 23(3)(1, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5485/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2013-14 Sudesh Dhanraj Murpana Income Tax Officer – 23(3) (1) (Huf) Matru Mandir, Tardeo, Grant 401 Somdhan Bldg, Perry Road, Cross Road Bandra (West), Vs. Mumbai - 400007 Mumbai 400050

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Jain and Shobit MishraFor Respondent: Shri Swapnil Choudhary, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 68

purchase and sale of shares were genuine transactions. 8. That in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO erred in alleging that the Appellant has indulged in bogus transactions by indulging in penny stock shares of M/s. ACI Infocom although the same had been done on the floor of the stock exchange. 9. That

Showing 1–20 of 566 · Page 1 of 29

...
Long Term Capital Gains24
Search & Seizure20
Section 139(1)17

JCIT CENT. CIR. - 1(4), MUMBAI vs. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1559/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2010-11 Grasim Industries Limited, The Dcit Cc-1(4), Corporate Finance Division, Room No. 902, 9Th Floor, Old Vs. A-2, Aditya Birla Centre, S.K. Cgo Building, M.K. Road, Ahire Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400030. Pan No. Aaacg 4464 B Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2010-11 Jcit (Osd), Central Circle- Grasim Industries Limited, 1(4), A-Wing, 2Nd Floor, Aditya Room No. 902, Pratishtha Vs. Birla Centre, S.K. Ahire Bhavan, 9Th Floor, Old Cgo Marg, Worli, Building Annexe, Mumbai-400030. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacg 4464 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Yogesh Thar & Mr. Chaitanya Joshi Revenue By : Dr. Kishor Dhule, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 03/04/2024 : Date Of Pronouncement 29/04/2024

For Appellant: Mr. Yogesh Thar &For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT-DR
Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 153C

1 pertaining to the assessee were forwarded forwarded to the Assessing Officer of the assessee Assessing Officer of the assessee following due procedure of law rocedure of law. Consequently, notice u/s 153C of the Act r.w.s. 153A was issued Consequently, notice u/s 153C of the Act r.w.s. 153A was issued Consequently, notice u/s 153C of the Act r.w.s. 153A

ACIT-15(3)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. SURYA FERROUS ALLOYS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

Appeal are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous

ITA 1407/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ajay R. SinghFor Respondent: Shri Kishor Dhule
Section 143(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 151ASection 40A(3)

bogus purchase transaction taking note of the fact that the Assessee had already disclosed gross profit of 8.5%, which was considered by the CIT(A) to be comparable and acceptable to the margins prevailing in the industry in which the Assessee was operating. However, the CIT(A) rejected Assessee’s challenge to the validity of reassessment proceedings. 7. Being aggrieved

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD , MUMBAI

ITA 1572/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD MUMBAI ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI , MUMBAI

ITA 1313/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1272/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2)., MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD , MUMBAI

ITA 1569/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

SHRIVALLABH PITTIE INDUSTRIES LTD ,MUMBAI. vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1337/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

ACIT (CC)-8(2) , MUMBAI vs. HELIOS EXPORTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1735/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

ACIT (CC)-8(2) , MUMBAI vs. HELIOS EXPORTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1734/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI MUMBAI MUMB, MUMBAI

ITA 1311/MUM/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

CITRON INFRAPROJECT LTD.,,MUMBAI-400005 vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI-20

ITA 1267/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

CITRON INFRAPROJECT LTD.,,MUMBAI-400005 vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI-400020

ITA 1268/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC- 8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1271/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S CITRON INFRAPROJECTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 1571/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 1740/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

HELLIOS EXPORTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1334/MUM/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 1310/MUM/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1273/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation

SVP SOUTH WEST INDUSTRIES LTD. (FORMERLY, PLATINUM TEXTILE LTD.),MUMBAI-400005 vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

ITA 1274/MUM/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

bogus sales. Therefore, it was clear that as STPL as an integral part of the SVP group of companies by its own admission before the settlement commission. Thereafter the learned assessing officer extracted the statement of 07. various persons recorded and held that it is now conclusively proved that the sale and purchase of the STPL are nothing but accommodation