BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin57Mumbai32Ahmedabad15Chandigarh7Chennai6Delhi5Jaipur4Pune2Bangalore2Agra1

Key Topics

Addition to Income32Section 69A30Section 143(3)24Bogus Purchases22Natural Justice16Section 14814Section 69C10Section 14710Section 6910

DCIT 10(3), MUMBAI vs. TOSCANO INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD, THANE

Appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6849/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 6577 & 6578/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Toscano Infrastructure Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited Income Tax 10(3) Ground Floor, Ashar I.T. Room No. 451 बनाम/ Park Road No. 16Z Aaykar Bhawan Vs. Wagle Industrial Estate M.K.Road Near Agricultural Bus Stop Mumbai -400 020 Thane(W) – 400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacct-7263-P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 6849 & 6850/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner Of Toscano Infrastructure Income Tax 10(3) Private Limited Room No. 451 Ground Floor, Ashar I.T. बनाम/ Aaykar Bhawan Park Road No. 16Z Vs. M.K.Road Wagle Industrial Estate Mumbai -400 020 Near Agricultural Bus Stop Thane(W) – 400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacct-7263-P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Dr. K.Shivram & Shri RahulFor Respondent: Dr. A.K.Nayak, Ld. DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 143(3)(iii)Section 147

bogus purchases for Rs.2,01,71,071/- in an assessment u/s 143(3) vide AO order dated 12/03/2013 which was contested before Ld. CIT(A) where the assessee got partial relief as the addition was restricted to 20%. The revenue has assailed the relief provided by the Ld. CIT(A) whereas the assessee has assailed the addition confirmed

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

Condonation of Delay10
Reassessment9
Disallowance9

TOSCANO INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD,THANE vs. DCIT 10-(3), MUMBAI

Appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6577/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 6577 & 6578/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Toscano Infrastructure Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited Income Tax 10(3) Ground Floor, Ashar I.T. Room No. 451 बनाम/ Park Road No. 16Z Aaykar Bhawan Vs. Wagle Industrial Estate M.K.Road Near Agricultural Bus Stop Mumbai -400 020 Thane(W) – 400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacct-7263-P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 6849 & 6850/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner Of Toscano Infrastructure Income Tax 10(3) Private Limited Room No. 451 Ground Floor, Ashar I.T. बनाम/ Aaykar Bhawan Park Road No. 16Z Vs. M.K.Road Wagle Industrial Estate Mumbai -400 020 Near Agricultural Bus Stop Thane(W) – 400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacct-7263-P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Dr. K.Shivram & Shri RahulFor Respondent: Dr. A.K.Nayak, Ld. DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 143(3)(iii)Section 147

bogus purchases for Rs.2,01,71,071/- in an assessment u/s 143(3) vide AO order dated 12/03/2013 which was contested before Ld. CIT(A) where the assessee got partial relief as the addition was restricted to 20%. The revenue has assailed the relief provided by the Ld. CIT(A) whereas the assessee has assailed the addition confirmed

DCIT 10(3), MUMBAI vs. TOSCANO INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD, THANE

Appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6850/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 6577 & 6578/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Toscano Infrastructure Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited Income Tax 10(3) Ground Floor, Ashar I.T. Room No. 451 बनाम/ Park Road No. 16Z Aaykar Bhawan Vs. Wagle Industrial Estate M.K.Road Near Agricultural Bus Stop Mumbai -400 020 Thane(W) – 400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacct-7263-P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 6849 & 6850/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner Of Toscano Infrastructure Income Tax 10(3) Private Limited Room No. 451 Ground Floor, Ashar I.T. बनाम/ Aaykar Bhawan Park Road No. 16Z Vs. M.K.Road Wagle Industrial Estate Mumbai -400 020 Near Agricultural Bus Stop Thane(W) – 400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacct-7263-P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Dr. K.Shivram & Shri RahulFor Respondent: Dr. A.K.Nayak, Ld. DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 143(3)(iii)Section 147

bogus purchases for Rs.2,01,71,071/- in an assessment u/s 143(3) vide AO order dated 12/03/2013 which was contested before Ld. CIT(A) where the assessee got partial relief as the addition was restricted to 20%. The revenue has assailed the relief provided by the Ld. CIT(A) whereas the assessee has assailed the addition confirmed

TOSCANO INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD,THANE vs. DCIT 10-(3), MUMBAI

Appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6578/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 6577 & 6578/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Toscano Infrastructure Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited Income Tax 10(3) Ground Floor, Ashar I.T. Room No. 451 बनाम/ Park Road No. 16Z Aaykar Bhawan Vs. Wagle Industrial Estate M.K.Road Near Agricultural Bus Stop Mumbai -400 020 Thane(W) – 400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacct-7263-P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 6849 & 6850/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner Of Toscano Infrastructure Income Tax 10(3) Private Limited Room No. 451 Ground Floor, Ashar I.T. बनाम/ Aaykar Bhawan Park Road No. 16Z Vs. M.K.Road Wagle Industrial Estate Mumbai -400 020 Near Agricultural Bus Stop Thane(W) – 400 604 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacct-7263-P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Dr. K.Shivram & Shri RahulFor Respondent: Dr. A.K.Nayak, Ld. DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 143(3)(iii)Section 147

bogus purchases for Rs.2,01,71,071/- in an assessment u/s 143(3) vide AO order dated 12/03/2013 which was contested before Ld. CIT(A) where the assessee got partial relief as the addition was restricted to 20%. The revenue has assailed the relief provided by the Ld. CIT(A) whereas the assessee has assailed the addition confirmed

VARDHAMAN REMEDIES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 9(3)(3), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1495/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227, Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), बनाम/ M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan H-405, Gokul Residency, Vs. M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. Cross-Objection No.142/Mum/2017 Arising Out Of Ita No. 1004/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. बनाम/ Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., 13(3)(2), H-405, Gokul Residency, Aayakar Bhavan 6773/M/2016 & –Co.142/Mu/2017 Near Samta Nagar, Vs. M.K. Road Kandivali (E), Mumbai 400020 Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vidhyadhar
Section 115JSection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69C

section 145A of the Act or rules there under. However, in the present case, The assessee has maintained the books of accounts which were also subjected to audit and the audit report was also filed before the lower authorities. The books of accounts were rejected during the assessment proceedings only because of bogus purchases

VARDHMAN REMEDIES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 13(3)(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6773/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227, Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), बनाम/ M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan H-405, Gokul Residency, Vs. M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. Cross-Objection No.142/Mum/2017 Arising Out Of Ita No. 1004/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. बनाम/ Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., 13(3)(2), H-405, Gokul Residency, Aayakar Bhavan 6773/M/2016 & –Co.142/Mu/2017 Near Samta Nagar, Vs. M.K. Road Kandivali (E), Mumbai 400020 Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vidhyadhar
Section 115JSection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69C

section 145A of the Act or rules there under. However, in the present case, The assessee has maintained the books of accounts which were also subjected to audit and the audit report was also filed before the lower authorities. The books of accounts were rejected during the assessment proceedings only because of bogus purchases

VARDHMAN REMEDIES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 13(3)(3), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6772/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227, Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), बनाम/ M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan H-405, Gokul Residency, Vs. M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. Cross-Objection No.142/Mum/2017 Arising Out Of Ita No. 1004/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. बनाम/ Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., 13(3)(2), H-405, Gokul Residency, Aayakar Bhavan 6773/M/2016 & –Co.142/Mu/2017 Near Samta Nagar, Vs. M.K. Road Kandivali (E), Mumbai 400020 Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vidhyadhar
Section 115JSection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69C

section 145A of the Act or rules there under. However, in the present case, The assessee has maintained the books of accounts which were also subjected to audit and the audit report was also filed before the lower authorities. The books of accounts were rejected during the assessment proceedings only because of bogus purchases

VARDHMAN REMEDIES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 9(3)(3),

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1494/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227, Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), बनाम/ M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan H-405, Gokul Residency, Vs. M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. Cross-Objection No.142/Mum/2017 Arising Out Of Ita No. 1004/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. बनाम/ Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., 13(3)(2), H-405, Gokul Residency, Aayakar Bhavan 6773/M/2016 & –Co.142/Mu/2017 Near Samta Nagar, Vs. M.K. Road Kandivali (E), Mumbai 400020 Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vidhyadhar
Section 115JSection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69C

section 145A of the Act or rules there under. However, in the present case, The assessee has maintained the books of accounts which were also subjected to audit and the audit report was also filed before the lower authorities. The books of accounts were rejected during the assessment proceedings only because of bogus purchases

ITO 13(3)(3), MUMBAI vs. VARDHMAN REMEDIES P.LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1004/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227, Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), बनाम/ M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan H-405, Gokul Residency, Vs. M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. Cross-Objection No.142/Mum/2017 Arising Out Of Ita No. 1004/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt बनाम/ Income Tax Officer 13(3)(3), Ltd., R.No.227,Aayakar Bhavan Vs. H-405, Gokul Residency, M.K. Road Near Samta Nagar, Mumbai 400020 Kandivali (E), Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. बनाम/ Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S.Vardhman Remedies Pvt Ltd., 13(3)(2), H-405, Gokul Residency, Aayakar Bhavan 6773/M/2016 & –Co.142/Mu/2017 Near Samta Nagar, Vs. M.K. Road Kandivali (E), Mumbai 400020 Mumbai-400101 (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Vidhyadhar
Section 115JSection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69C

section 145A of the Act or rules there under. However, in the present case, The assessee has maintained the books of accounts which were also subjected to audit and the audit report was also filed before the lower authorities. The books of accounts were rejected during the assessment proceedings only because of bogus purchases

BLUES IT INNOVATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO - 12(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 6298/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234ASection 254(1)Section 69C

145A, Ist Floor, Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400020 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Income Tax Officer Ward-12(1)(1) Blues IT Innovations India Private Room No. 129, Ist Floor, Vs Limited, Flat No. 24, J 24, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mahavir Nagar, Dahanukarwadi, Mumbai-400020 Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

BLUES IT INNOVATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO - 12(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 6300/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234ASection 254(1)Section 69C

145A, Ist Floor, Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400020 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Income Tax Officer Ward-12(1)(1) Blues IT Innovations India Private Room No. 129, Ist Floor, Vs Limited, Flat No. 24, J 24, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mahavir Nagar, Dahanukarwadi, Mumbai-400020 Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

BLUES IT INNOVATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO -12(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 6299/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234ASection 254(1)Section 69C

145A, Ist Floor, Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400020 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Income Tax Officer Ward-12(1)(1) Blues IT Innovations India Private Room No. 129, Ist Floor, Vs Limited, Flat No. 24, J 24, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mahavir Nagar, Dahanukarwadi, Mumbai-400020 Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

INCOME-TAX OFFICER - 12(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. BLUES IT INNOVATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 6465/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234ASection 254(1)Section 69C

145A, Ist Floor, Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400020 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Income Tax Officer Ward-12(1)(1) Blues IT Innovations India Private Room No. 129, Ist Floor, Vs Limited, Flat No. 24, J 24, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mahavir Nagar, Dahanukarwadi, Mumbai-400020 Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

BLUES IT INNOVATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO - 12(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 6297/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234ASection 254(1)Section 69C

145A, Ist Floor, Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400020 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Income Tax Officer Ward-12(1)(1) Blues IT Innovations India Private Room No. 129, Ist Floor, Vs Limited, Flat No. 24, J 24, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K.Road, Mahavir Nagar, Dahanukarwadi, Mumbai-400020 Kandivali (W) Mumbai-400067 [PAN: AACCB4562D] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

CHHEDA SPECIALITIES FOODS PVT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-12(1)-4, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2305/MUM/2023[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Oct 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Kuldip Singh & Shri Amarjit Singhchheda Specialities Vs. Ito-12(1)(4) Foods Pvt. Ltd. 145A, Aayakar Bhavan, Plot No. 7, Bmc Ind M. K. Road, Estate, Sai Nagar, Churchgate, Mg Road No. 1, Mumbai-400020 Kandivali (W), Mumbai-400067 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccc6221G Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri. Rahul HakaniFor Respondent: Shri. Ajay Singh
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 37

145A, Aayakar Bhavan, Plot No. 7, BMC Ind M. K. Road, Estate, Sai Nagar, Churchgate, MG Road No. 1, Mumbai-400020 Kandivali (W), Mumbai-400067 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AACCC6221G Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shri. Rahul Hakani Respondent by : Shri. Ajay Singh Date of Hearing 12.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement 30.10.2023 आदेश

ITO 12 (1)(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S BRIT SOAP MACHINERY PVT LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6049/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Smita Verma, D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

145A, 1st Floor, Plot No.116A, Kandivali Aaykar Bhavan, Co-op Industrial Estate Vs. M.K. Road, Ltd., Mumbai - 400020 Charkop, Kandivali West Mumbai – 400 067 PAN: AACCB7850N (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : None Revenue by : Ms. Smita Verma, D.R. Date of Hearing : 24.06.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 24.06.2021 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal

GOPALDAS VISRAM & CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT 4(2), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off accordingly

ITA 3516/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev KhandelwalFor Respondent: Miss Vidisha Kalara
Section 69Section 69A

bogus purchases/unproven purchases of raw materials and packing materials based on new evidences submitted by the assessee without giving the assessing officer an opportunity to examine the same. 14. Facts in brief are that the AO, during the course of assessment proceedings, called for certain details in respect of raw materials from the assessee which were filed accordingly

GOPALDAS VISRAM & CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 4(2)(2), MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off accordingly

ITA 3517/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev KhandelwalFor Respondent: Miss Vidisha Kalara
Section 69Section 69A

bogus purchases/unproven purchases of raw materials and packing materials based on new evidences submitted by the assessee without giving the assessing officer an opportunity to examine the same. 14. Facts in brief are that the AO, during the course of assessment proceedings, called for certain details in respect of raw materials from the assessee which were filed accordingly

ACIT 4(2)(2), MUMBAI vs. GOPALDAS VISRAM & CO. LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off accordingly

ITA 4587/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev KhandelwalFor Respondent: Miss Vidisha Kalara
Section 69Section 69A

bogus purchases/unproven purchases of raw materials and packing materials based on new evidences submitted by the assessee without giving the assessing officer an opportunity to examine the same. 14. Facts in brief are that the AO, during the course of assessment proceedings, called for certain details in respect of raw materials from the assessee which were filed accordingly

ACIT 4(2)(2), MUMBAI vs. GOPALDAS VISRAM & CO. LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are disposed off accordingly

ITA 4586/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev KhandelwalFor Respondent: Miss Vidisha Kalara
Section 69Section 69A

bogus purchases/unproven purchases of raw materials and packing materials based on new evidences submitted by the assessee without giving the assessing officer an opportunity to examine the same. 14. Facts in brief are that the AO, during the course of assessment proceedings, called for certain details in respect of raw materials from the assessee which were filed accordingly