BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 140Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9Jaipur1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 69A32Addition to Income9Section 2508Business Income8Section 1484Section 143(3)2Section 1512Section 143(2)2

RAMESHCHANDRA BHAGWATIPRASAD BAGADIA,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD.32(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 110/MUM/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Dec 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: The Issue Of Notice U/S.148. The Relevant Grounds Raised By The Assessee Reads As Under:-

Section 139(1)Section 140ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 151

140A. 3. The brief facts are that the original return of income was filed on 15/10/2010 for A.Y.2009-10 declaring total income of Rs. 2,11,800/-. The assessee’s case was reopened on the basis of information received from DGIT (Investigation) Mumbai which in turn was based on information from Sales Tax department that assessee has made bogus purchases from

DCIT CC 5 1 MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 4589/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2025AY 2020-21
Section 250Section 69A

140A(3) of the \nAct has already been declared ultra vires by \ncompetent High Court in country, authority like \nTribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect \nlaw laid down by High Court, though of different \nState, so long as there is no contrary decision of any \nother High Court on that point. \n(Page 15 to 16 of Paper

DCIT CC 5-1, MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED , MUMBAI

The Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed and that of the department is dismissed

ITA 4591/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 250Section 69A

140A(3) of the Act has already been declared ultra vires by competent High Court in country, authority like Tribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect law laid down by High Court, though of different State, so long as there is no contrary decision of any other High Court on that point. (Page 15 to 16 of Paper Book

J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -5(1), MUMBAI

The Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed and that of the department is dismissed

ITA 4153/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 250Section 69A

140A(3) of the Act has already been declared ultra vires by competent High Court in country, authority like Tribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect law laid down by High Court, though of different State, so long as there is no contrary decision of any other High Court on that point. (Page 15 to 16 of Paper Book

DCIT, MUMBAI vs. J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED, MUMBAI

The Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed and that of the department is dismissed

ITA 4593/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 250Section 69A

140A(3) of the Act has already been declared ultra vires by competent High Court in country, authority like Tribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect law laid down by High Court, though of different State, so long as there is no contrary decision of any other High Court on that point. (Page 15 to 16 of Paper Book

J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -5(1), MUMBAI

The Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed and that of the department is dismissed

ITA 4151/MUM/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 250Section 69A

140A(3) of the Act has already been declared ultra vires by competent High Court in country, authority like Tribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect law laid down by High Court, though of different State, so long as there is no contrary decision of any other High Court on that point. (Page 15 to 16 of Paper Book

J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -5(1), MUMBAI

The Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed and that of the department is dismissed

ITA 4150/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 250Section 69A

140A(3) of the Act has already been declared ultra vires by competent High Court in country, authority like Tribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect law laid down by High Court, though of different State, so long as there is no contrary decision of any other High Court on that point. (Page 15 to 16 of Paper Book

J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -5(1), MUMBAI

ITA 4147/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2025AY 2016-17
Section 250Section 69A

140A(3) of the\nAct has already been declared ultra vires by\ncompetent High Court in country, authority like\nTribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect\nlaw laid down by High Court, though of different\nState, so long as there is no contrary decision of any\nother High Court on that point.\n(Page 15 to 16 of Paper

DCIT CC 5 1 MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. J KUMAR INFRAPROJECTS LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 4590/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jul 2025AY 2019-20
Section 250Section 69A

140A(3) of the\nAct has already been declared ultra vires by\ncompetent High Court in country, authority like\nTribunal acting anywhere in country has to respect\nlaw laid down by High Court, though of different\nState, so long as there is no contrary decision of any\nother High Court on that point.\n(Page 15 to 16 of Paper