BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

529 results for “TDS”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai529Delhi433Bangalore285Kolkata127Hyderabad115Chennai98Patna78Jaipur78Chandigarh46Raipur46Ahmedabad33Visakhapatnam25Pune23Rajkot23Lucknow23Indore20Agra16Panaji16Surat16Guwahati13Nagpur13Jodhpur10Cochin7Varanasi4Allahabad3Ranchi2Jabalpur2Dehradun2Telangana1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Survey u/s 133A77Section 201(1)72Section 133A68Addition to Income65Section 6853Section 20141Deduction41TDS41Section 14A40Disallowance

ACIT 21(2) vs. ORIENTAL DECORATORS, MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 820/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No. 820/Mum/2015 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2009-10)

For Appellant: Shri. Hari.S. RahejaFor Respondent: Shri. Rajat Mittal
Section 133ASection 143(3)

133A which was later on retracted. In the absence of any other corroborative evidence placed on record by the AO to support the additions made, such addition made cannot be sustained and hence additions made amounting to Rs. 58,00,000/- is hereby deleted. 50. Regarding the instances of additions made in the case of the appellant

ITO 22(1)-2, NAVI MUMBAI vs. J V CHEM (INDIA), MUMBAI

In the result , both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed, as indicated above

Showing 1–20 of 529 · Page 1 of 27

...
37
Section 194C32
Section 143(3)29
ITA 3763/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3786/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), Ito 22(1)(2), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Building, Ghatkopar East, Vashi, Mumbai- 400077 Navi Mumbai स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aabfj4268L आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3763/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) Ito 22(1)(2), बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station Building, R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Vashi, Ghatkopar East, Navi Mumbai Mumbai-400077 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aabfj4268L (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri. Rajeev Gubgotra (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 40Section 41

133A, 15 person came at the office premises (a tiny space of l80sq feet) for making the survey, consisting of ITO’s/ADC1T and staff of 1TO. The search commenced in afternoon and was completed in early morning to next day. During the survey operation all record of assessee was mixed in a very small place and there was a total

J.V. CHEM (INDIA),MUMBAI vs. ITO 22(1)2, NAVI MUMBAI

In the result , both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are partly allowed, as indicated above

ITA 3786/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jun 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3786/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), Ito 22(1)(2), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Building, Ghatkopar East, Vashi, Mumbai- 400077 Navi Mumbai स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aabfj4268L आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3763/Mum/2011 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) Ito 22(1)(2), बिाम/ J.V. Chem (India), 4T H Floor, Tower 6, B-1, Neelkanth Chhaya, Vashi Rly. Station Building, R.B. Mehta Marg, V. Vashi, Ghatkopar East, Navi Mumbai Mumbai-400077 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aabfj4268L (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri. Rajeev Gubgotra (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 40Section 41

133A, 15 person came at the office premises (a tiny space of l80sq feet) for making the survey, consisting of ITO’s/ADC1T and staff of 1TO. The search commenced in afternoon and was completed in early morning to next day. During the survey operation all record of assessee was mixed in a very small place and there was a total

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 905/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 864/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 903/MUM/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 906/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 904/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 863/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 862/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS. Appellant prays for deletion of Demand u/s 194C _ 5. Learned CIT (A) 13 erred in not giving speaking order for charging Interest u/s 201 up to date of order even though proof of filing Return were submitted to Assessing Officer. Appellant prays that Interest is chargeable up to date of filing Return by deductee where proof of filing Return

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6420/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2014-15
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

TDS u/s 194C of the Act, but not\nu/s 194H of the Act, as determined by the authorities below.\n13. Though the AO had relied on the statement of one of the CFAs\nnamely M/s. Hoosaini & Co. recorded during survey u/s 133A

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6425/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2019-20
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

TDS u/s 194C of the Act, but not\nu/s 194H of the Act, as determined by the authorities below.\n13. Though the AO had relied on the statement of one of the CFAs\nnamely M/s. Hoosaini & Co. recorded during survey u/s 133A

M/S CEAT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OSD TDS CIRLCE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6419/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2013-14
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

TDS us/ 194C of the Act, but not\nu/s 194H of the Act, as determined by the authorities below.\n13. Though the AO had relied on the statement of one of the CFAs\nnamely M/s. Hoosaini & Co. recorded during survey u/s 133A

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6421/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2015-16
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

TDS us/ 194C of the Act, but not\nu/s 194H of the Act, as determined by the authorities below.\n13. Though the AO had relied on the statement of one of the CFAs\nnamely M/s. Hoosaini & Co. recorded during survey u/s 133A

M/S CEAT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6422/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

TDS us/ 194C of the Act, but not\nu/s 194H of the Act, as determined by the authorities below.\n13. Though the AO had relied on the statement of one of the CFAs\nnamely M/s. Hoosaini & Co. recorded during survey u/s 133A

M/S CEAT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6423/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

TDS us/ 194C of the Act, but not\nu/s 194H of the Act, as determined by the authorities below.\n13. Though the AO had relied on the statement of one of the CFAs\nnamely M/s. Hoosaini & Co. recorded during survey u/s 133A

M/S CEAT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OSD TDS CIRCLE 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6424/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2025AY 2018-19
Section 133Section 194CSection 194HSection 250

TDS us/ 194C of the Act, but not\nu/s 194H of the Act, as determined by the authorities below.\n13. Though the AO had relied on the statement of one of the CFAs\nnamely M/s. Hoosaini & Co. recorded during survey u/s 133A

SWASTIK REALTORS,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 15(3), MUMBAI

ITA 800/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.800/Mum/2012 & 6314/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 & 2008-09) Swastik Realtors The Assistant बनाम/ 312, Swastik Disha Commissioner Of Income V. Corporate Park , Kohinoor Tax – 15(3), Textile Printing Compound Matru Mandir I T Office Opp. Shreyas Cinema, Lbs Nana Chowk Marg, Ghatkopar(W) Grant Road Mumbai-400 086 Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Abafs2576A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

survey carried out u/s 133A of the Act on Moxdiam , certain books of accounts and loose sheets were impounded on 09-07-2008 . It was submitted by said Mr. Nitesh Jain that statement of Mr. Basant D. Jain was recorded u/s 131 of the Act dated 09- 07-2008 which was duly acknowledged and endorsed by Mr Nitesh Jain whereby

SWASTIK REALTORS,MUMBAI vs. A.C.I.T.15(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6314/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.800/Mum/2012 & 6314/Mum/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2007-08 & 2008-09) Swastik Realtors The Assistant बनाम/ 312, Swastik Disha Commissioner Of Income V. Corporate Park , Kohinoor Tax – 15(3), Textile Printing Compound Matru Mandir I T Office Opp. Shreyas Cinema, Lbs Nana Chowk Marg, Ghatkopar(W) Grant Road Mumbai-400 086 Mumbai. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Abafs2576A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

survey carried out u/s 133A of the Act on Moxdiam , certain books of accounts and loose sheets were impounded on 09-07-2008 . It was submitted by said Mr. Nitesh Jain that statement of Mr. Basant D. Jain was recorded u/s 131 of the Act dated 09- 07-2008 which was duly acknowledged and endorsed by Mr Nitesh Jain whereby

M/S K R CONSTRUCTION ,MUMBAI vs. PR CIT CENTRAL-3, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 7615/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri G. Manjunathak.R.Construction Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Basement, Hinal Residency Income Tax-Central-3 19Th Floor Datta Mandir Road Dahanukar Wadi Air India Building Kandivali(W) Nariman Point Mumbai-400 067 Mumbai-400 021

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 263

survey conducted u/s 133A of the Act, and also in the aspect of bogus labor contract. During the course of reassessment proceedings, the assessee has explained the difference between turnover reported in two set of financial statements and also, explained the issue of bogus labour contract expenses with reference specific questionnaire issued by the Ld. AO along with notice u/s