BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,163 results for “TDS”+ Section 87clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,265Mumbai1,163Bangalore508Kolkata302Chennai300Ahmedabad253Hyderabad247Indore177Jaipur146Karnataka117Chandigarh114Cochin100Pune82Cuttack66Raipur61Rajkot49Visakhapatnam45Surat39Dehradun31Lucknow30Jodhpur26Nagpur24Agra23Guwahati20Kerala17Ranchi16Allahabad15Amritsar12Telangana10Varanasi10Patna6SC6Panaji4Jabalpur3Calcutta2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 14A77Addition to Income64Disallowance51Section 143(3)49Section 4046TDS35Deduction29Section 1022Section 14820Section 250

CORNERVIEW CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 9TDS) - CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 3285/MUM/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri Jintendra JainFor Respondent: Shri Neil Philip
Section 194ISection 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS)–CPC, Ghaziabad Assessee by : Shri Jintendra Jain Revenue by : Shri Neil Philip Date of Hearing – 15.05.2019 Date of Order – 28.06.2019 O R D E R PER BENCH Captioned appeals by the same assessee are against a consolidated order dated 31st March 2018, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–59, Mumbai, for the assessment year

Showing 1–20 of 1,163 · Page 1 of 59

...
17
Section 153C16
Section 143(1)15

CORNERVIEW CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT (TDS) - CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Assessee are hereby ordered to be dismissed

ITA 3653/MUM/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jul 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. Nos.3653 To 3667/Mum/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S. Cornerview बिधम/ Acit(Tds)-Cpc, Construction & Developers Ghaziabad. Vs. Pvt. Ltd. Building No. 10, 5Th Floor, Acme Group, Solitaire Park, Guru Hargovindji Road, Andheri (E), 400093.. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aafcc9548R (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Ravikant Pathak Revenue By: Shri Abi Rama Kartikiyen (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 30/07/2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/07/2019

For Appellant: Shri Ravikant PathakFor Respondent: Shri Abi Rama Kartikiyen (DR)
Section 194ISection 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS)-CPC, Construction & Developers Ghaziabad. Vs. Pvt. Ltd. Building No. 10, 5th Floor, acme Group, Solitaire Park, Guru Hargovindji Road, Andheri (E), 400093.. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAFCC9548R (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Ravikant Pathak Revenue by: Shri Abi Rama Kartikiyen (DR) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 30/07/2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date

ACIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 1144/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7210/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

M.R. CONSTRUCTION,.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3711/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7214/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

ASST CIT CC-22, MUMBAI vs. JAWAHAR PUROHIT, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 6847/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

M. R. CONSTRUCTION,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 790/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7212/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

ASST CIT CC-22, MUMBAI vs. JAWAHAR PUROHIT, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 6848/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

M.R. CONSTRUCTION,.,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3710/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7209/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7208/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7211/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

DCIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3646/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

JAWAHAR B. PUROHIT,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 22XC, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 7213/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

DCIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI vs. M.R. CONSTRUCTION, MUMBAI

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3645/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

M.R. CONSTRUCTION,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 22,

In the result, in the case of M

ITA 3709/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Rajesh Kumar, Am

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 201Section 21Section 40Section 40a

TDS under section 194C of the Act on transportation charges by invoking the provisions of section 40a(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs.21,87

CHATTANATHAN DEVARAJAN ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 34(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4976/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2014-15 Chattanathan Devarajan Income Tax Officer - 34(1)(1) 1101, Raheja Tipco Heights Mumbai Rani Sati Marg, Vs. Malad East Mumbai – 400067 (Pan: Abjpc6332P) (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Haridas Bhat, CAFor Respondent: Shri Virabhadra Mahajan, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 156Section 192Section 194Section 194ASection 271(1)(c)

TDS Form 92,87,376 24Q, Section 192) (b) TDS-194A TDS Return Other Interest 3,84,683 (Section 194A

STOCK HOLDING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT 8 (2) (2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5796/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Amarjit Singhassessment Year: 2011-12 M/S Stock Holding Corporation Of Dy. Commissioner Of Income – India Ltd., Tax, Range -8(2)(2), Unit No. 301, 3Rd Floor, Peninsula Room No. 615, Center Point, Opp. Bharat Mata Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Cinema, Dr. Babasaheb Maharishi Karve Road, Ambedkar Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400020 Mumbai - 400012 Pan: Aabcs1429B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Akram Khan (Ar) Revenue By : Shri B K Bagchi (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 11/12/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 05/01/2022

For Appellant: Shri Akram Khan (AR)For Respondent: Shri B K Bagchi (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 199Section 203A

section 203AA of the Act ) as against TDS credit of ₹ 17, 39, 68, 882/- claimed by the assessee. The assessee filed copy of TDS certificates amounting to Rs. 2, 64, 87