BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh50Delhi11Ahmedabad5Bangalore4Indore3Mumbai3Jaipur3Karnataka2Agra1Surat1Chennai1Cuttack1Hyderabad1Kolkata1Patna1Pune1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 234A2Section 1322Addition to Income2

ITO 24(2)(5), MUMBAI vs. SHRI. MOHMMED IQBAL MOHD. AFAQUE KHAN, PANVEL

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1421/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Bleincome Tax Officer – 24(2)(5) V. Shri Mohammed Iqbal Mohd. Afaque Khan A-602, Plot No. 447 Room No. 611, Piramal Chambers Highland Park Chs Ltd., Lalbaug, Mumbai – 400 012 Opp. Morarji Takka, Panvel -410206 Pan: Aacpk7522M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : None Department By : Shri M.P. Ahuja

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.P. Ahuja
Section 143(2)Section 68

section can disallow the deduction of a legitimate cost incurred on the asset. Out of the above Rs.8,85,150/- is cost of improvement on the land sold. Hence the same is deducted. The interest has been considered on Land sold for the last two years. Details is attached. The interest is paid and TDS has been duly deducted

SHRI RAJESH RAMCHANDRA DAKE,PANVEL vs. DY CIT CC-1, MUMBAI

ITA 3/MUM/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Jan 2025AY 2008-09
For Appellant: \nShri Rajesh Ramchandra DakeFor Respondent: \nDy. Commissioner of Income Tax
Section 10Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250

TDS was deducted therefore the payments cannot be treated as brokerage income of the Assessee. The Assessee also claimed that the AO was orally requested to allow the Assessee to cross examine the Directors of VIPL or VPPL. However, the AO, without giving any opportunity to the Assessee to cross-examination has made the said addition. The Assessee before

HUNTSMAN INVESTMENTS (NETHERLANDS),MUMBAI vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAX CIRCLE-2(2)(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4222/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2024AY 2021-22
Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 234ASection 234B

54B, 43[***] 44[45[54D,\n46[54E, 47[54EA, 54EB,] 54F 48[, 54G and 54H]]]]], be chargeable to income-tax under the head\n\"Capital gains\", and shall be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which the transfer\ntook place.\"\nThe assessee had acquired shares of Huntsman International (India) Private\nLimited (HIIPL) in different tranches from