BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 293Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi22Dehradun17Chennai8Mumbai5

Key Topics

Section 44B30Section 143(3)5Section 115A4Addition to Income2

SERVICOS DE PETROLEO CONSTELLATION SA ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-4(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4815/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm & Smt Renu Jauhri, Am Servicos De Petroleo Constellation Sa Dcit(International Taxation), India Project Office: Circle-4(2)(1) Unit No. 1803 To 1808, 18Th Floor, Mumbai B-Wing, Business Park, Vs. Veer Savarkar Road, Part Site, Vikhroli (W), Mumbai-400 079

For Appellant: ShriPrashant ShahFor Respondent: Smt. Shaileja Rai &
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 44B

293A apply for the purposes of computing profits or gains or any other income referred to in those sections. (2) The amounts referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely :— (a) the amount paid or payable3 (whether in or out of India) to the assessee or to any person on his behalf on account of the provision

DCIT 4(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. WEATHERFORD DRILLING INTERNATIONAL (BVI) LTD, MUMBAI

The appeals are dismissed

ITA 3724/MUM/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3724/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2010-11) बिाम/ Dcit(It) 4(3)(2) M/S. Weatherford Room No. 1728 Drilling International 17Th Floor, (Bvi) Ltd., V. Air India Building Unit 71 & 74, 7 Th Floor, Nariman Point Kalpataru Square, Mumbai 400021 Kondivita Lane, Andheri (E), Mumbai 400059 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aaacw7377F (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Revenue By: Shri. C.S Sharma, Dr Assessee By : Shri. Kishan Kumar Mundhra सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 18.09.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.09.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar: This Appeal, Filed By Revenue, Being Ita No. 3724/Mum/2017, Is Directed Against Appellate Order Dated 23.02.2017 Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-58, Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Cit(A)”), For Assessment Year 2010-11, The Appellate Proceedings Had Arisen Before Learned Cit(A) From Assessment Order Dated 15.05.2013 Passed By Learned Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Called “The Ao”) U/S 144C(3) R.W.S. 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act”) For Assessment Year 2010-11. I.T.A. No.3724/Mum/2017

For Appellant: Shri. Kishan Kumar MundhraFor Respondent: Shri. C.S Sharma, DR
Section 144C(3)Section 44B

293A apply for the purposes of computing profits or gains or any other income referred to in those sections. (2) The amounts referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely:— (a) the amount paid or payable (whether in or out of India) to the assessee or to any person on his behalf on account of the provision

SEADRILL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-4(2)(1), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4700/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jan 2025AY 2021-22
Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 270ASection 44B

293A apply\nfor the purposes of computing profits or gains or any other income referred to in\nthose sections.\n(2) The amounts referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely :—\n(a) the amount paid or payable (whether in or out of India) to the assessee or to\nany person on his behalf on account

FUGRO ROVTECH LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST DIT (IT) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as partly allowed

ITA 1230/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jan 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am & Pawan Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.1230/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year:2010-11) बनाम/ Fugro Rovtech Limited Asstt. Director Of Income Tax (Now Known As „Fugro Subsea (International Taxation)-3(2), Vs. 132, 1St Floor, Services Limited‟ C/O Srbc & Associates Scindia House, Llp, 16Th Floor, The Ruby, Ballard Pier, 29 Senapati Bapat Marg, Mumbai-400038 Dadar (W), Mumbai-400028 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 234BSection 44B

TDS. Other grounds are general in nature and hence they do not require any adjudication. 2. The assessee is a foreign company incorporated in United Kingdom. It is engaged in the business of providing services in connection with prospecting, extraction and exploration of oil and gas. Another company named M/s Allseas Marine Contractors SA (hereinafter “Allseas”) was awarded a contract

PRODUCTION TESTING SERVICES INC,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (IT) 3(3)(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1782/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.C Sharma, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 1782/Mum/2015 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Production Testing Services Inc. Dcit (It), 3(3)(2)Floor, Sindia House, Ground Floor, Ballard C/O. Madhav Joshi & Associates बिधम/ Estate, Mumbai – 400 038. A-1, Koteshwar Niwas, Gr. Floor, Vs. Subhash Road, Ville Parle (E), Mumbai – 400 057 स्थामीरेखासं./ जीआइआयसं./ Pan/Gir No. Aafcp5834R (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent :

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Singh & Ms. Mallika
Section 115ASection 143(3)Section 44B

293A applied for the purpose of computing profits and gains or any other income referred to in those sections. Production Testing Services Inc. vs. DCIT(IT) 6 ITA NO. 1782/Mum/2016 – A.Y. 2011-12 (iii). That as per the assessee the provisions of Sec. 115A were not applicable in its case as the assessee had not entered into an agreement with