ORANGE FISH ENTERTAINMENT PRVITE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 13(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Anikesh Banerjee () Assessment Year: 2013-14

TDS Return by Hindustan Unilever Limited which was subsequently rectified. Hindustan Unilever Limited which was subsequently rectified. Hindustan Unilever Limited which was subsequently rectified. The conclusion arrived at by the Learned CIT(A) is hasty and based The conclusion arrived at by the Learned CIT(A) is hasty and based The conclusion arrived at by the Learned

DY CIT-1(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed partly assessee is allowed partly whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed