BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

392 results for “TDS”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi423Mumbai392Bangalore156Hyderabad53Ahmedabad38Chennai32Karnataka28Kolkata25Pune20Jaipur20Agra16Indore13Ranchi13Chandigarh10Lucknow9Guwahati8Cochin8Jodhpur7Rajkot7Nagpur6Surat4Raipur4Allahabad4Jabalpur3SC1Telangana1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 234A80Section 234E64Section 143(3)62Section 200A60TDS49Addition to Income43Section 3537Disallowance31Deduction28Section 144C(13)

CORNERVIEW CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 9TDS) - CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 3285/MUM/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri Jintendra JainFor Respondent: Shri Neil Philip
Section 194ISection 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act, the Assessing Officer is empowered to levy fee under section 234E of the Act, which the Assessing Officer has done in the present case. 10. The validity of the provision contained under section 234A

FORESIGHT HOLDINGS, MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

Showing 1–20 of 392 · Page 1 of 20

...
27
Section 234B24
Section 14A24

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for A

ITA 3938/MUM/2015[2013-14(Q-2,3 & 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Mar 2017

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sanjay Gargm/S. Foresight Holdings Dcit (Tds) Cpc #11, 2Nd Floor, Ismail Mansion Aayakar Bhavan Vs. 94/96/98 Bazargate, Fort Sector 3, Vyshali Mumbai 400001 Ghaziabad 201010 Pan – Aacff9466H Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar Rai
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

CONCEPT MANAGEMENT CONSLUTING LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4428/MUM/2015[2014-15(24Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Aug 2016

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

MEDICAL ENGINEERS INDIA LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4072/MUM/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

KAPOOR GLASS (INDIA) P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) CPC, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4071/MUM/2015[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

ARPANNA MOTORS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 1(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4175/MUM/2015[2013-14(26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

BHOJA VITTAL SHETTY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 3961/MUM/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

DINESHKUMAR S. GUPTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4088/MUM/2015[2013-14(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

DIAMOND SHIPBROKERS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 1(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4127/MUM/2015[2014-15(27Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

ROHA DYECHEM P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 2971/MUM/2015[2009-10(26Q 4TH)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

KASH REALTORS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO TDS 1(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4199/MUM/2015[2013-14(26Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

HITESH SHANKAR SHETTY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 3962/MUM/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

BHASKAR KRISHNA SHETTY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 3964/MUM/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

BABITA MALKANI,MUMBAI vs. ITO TDS 1(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4475/MUM/2015[2013-14(Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Aug 2016

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

MILESTONE SPACE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4745/MUM/2016[2013-14 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

MILSESTONE SPACE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, MUMBAI

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4739/MUM/2016[2013-14 (24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

MILESTONE ESTATE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4743/MUM/2016[2013-14 (26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

SPRING TIME CLUBS & HOSPITALITY SERVICES P.LTD,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4748/MUM/2016[2013-14 (24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

SANJAY SATISHCHANDRA DUTT,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4747/MUM/2016[2013-14 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

ASST CIT 11(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. VRITTI IMPEX P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4441/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Aug 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced