BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

389 results for “TDS”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi419Mumbai389Bangalore146Hyderabad79Ahmedabad44Pune33Jaipur31Chennai30Kolkata29Karnataka28Agra15Indore15Ranchi14Chandigarh11Lucknow9Cochin9Guwahati9Dehradun8Rajkot8Jodhpur7Nagpur7Jabalpur6Allahabad5Surat5Raipur4Visakhapatnam3SC1Cuttack1Telangana1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 234A63Section 143(3)50Section 234E47Section 200A47TDS47Addition to Income38Section 14836Section 14A31Disallowance30Section 2(15)

GROWMORE EXPORTS LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 31, MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee ‘s appeal for the assessment year 2008-09

ITA 3491/MUM/2014[1992-93]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Jan 2016AY 1992-93

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Appellant: Shri Dharmesh Shah &For Respondent: Dr. P.Daniel
Section 234ASection 250

234A,234B and 234C of the Act without considering TDS on income assessed: 7.1 In this ground, the assessee contends that the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous in not considering that the income assessed in its hands were subjected to TDS and, therefore, on the said amount of tax, no interests under section

CORNERVIEW CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 9TDS) - CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 389 · Page 1 of 20

...
28
Deduction27
Section 25023
ITA 3285/MUM/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jun 2019AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deyand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri Jintendra JainFor Respondent: Shri Neil Philip
Section 194ISection 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act, the Assessing Officer is empowered to levy fee under section 234E of the Act, which the Assessing Officer has done in the present case. 10. The validity of the provision contained under section 234A

FORESIGHT HOLDINGS, MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for A

ITA 3938/MUM/2015[2013-14(Q-2,3 & 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Mar 2017

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sanjay Gargm/S. Foresight Holdings Dcit (Tds) Cpc #11, 2Nd Floor, Ismail Mansion Aayakar Bhavan Vs. 94/96/98 Bazargate, Fort Sector 3, Vyshali Mumbai 400001 Ghaziabad 201010 Pan – Aacff9466H Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Kumar Rai
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

CONCEPT MANAGEMENT CONSLUTING LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4428/MUM/2015[2014-15(24Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Aug 2016

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

KASH REALTORS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO TDS 1(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4199/MUM/2015[2013-14(26Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

DIAMOND SHIPBROKERS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 1(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4127/MUM/2015[2014-15(27Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

HITESH SHANKAR SHETTY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 3962/MUM/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

ROHA DYECHEM P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 2971/MUM/2015[2009-10(26Q 4TH)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

KAPOOR GLASS (INDIA) P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) CPC, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4071/MUM/2015[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

ARPANNA MOTORS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 1(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4175/MUM/2015[2013-14(26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

MEDICAL ENGINEERS INDIA LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4072/MUM/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

DINESHKUMAR S. GUPTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4088/MUM/2015[2013-14(Q-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

BHOJA VITTAL SHETTY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 3961/MUM/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

BHASKAR KRISHNA SHETTY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 3964/MUM/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jul 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.W. Angolkar, D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

BABITA MALKANI,MUMBAI vs. ITO TDS 1(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4475/MUM/2015[2013-14(Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Aug 2016

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Pawan Singh (Jm)

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

SPRING TIME CLUBS & HOSPITALITY SERVICES P.LTD,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4748/MUM/2016[2013-14 (24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

MILESTONE SPACE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4745/MUM/2016[2013-14 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

MILSESTONE SPACE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, MUMBAI

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4739/MUM/2016[2013-14 (24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

SANJAY SATISHCHANDRA DUTT,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4747/MUM/2016[2013-14 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced

MILESTONE ESTATE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

ITA 4743/MUM/2016[2013-14 (26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2017

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Respondent: Ms. Aarju Garodia
Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement under section 200A of the Act. However, after 01.06.15 the Assessing Authority is well within his limit to levy fee under section 234E of the Act even while processing the statement under section 200A and making adjustment. The relevant part of the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal for the sake of completeness is reproduced