BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

322 results for “TDS”+ Section 204clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai322Delhi270Bangalore168Karnataka107Kolkata81Pune77Chandigarh63Chennai52Jaipur46Ahmedabad37Hyderabad33Ranchi31Visakhapatnam31Indore25Raipur16Surat12Lucknow11Nagpur10Panaji10Rajkot8Cochin6Jabalpur6Patna6Guwahati5Agra3Dehradun2J&K2SC2Kerala1Telangana1Varanasi1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 20188Section 143(3)59Addition to Income50TDS45Disallowance45Deduction44Section 4037Section 9034Section 143(1)32Section 154

DCIT (TDS)(OSD)-2(3), MUMBAI vs. UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 126/MUM/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Apr 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Hiten ChandeFor Respondent: Shri Ankush Kapoor
Section 165ASection 204Section 250

TDS held that the assessee is making substantial payments to driver partners, the restaurant partners, and the courier partners without deducting tax at source, thereby violating the provisions of Chapter XVIIB of the Act and more specifically section 194C r/w section 204

UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT (TDS)-2(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 322 · Page 1 of 17

...
31
Section 8028
Section 14719
ITA 711/MUM/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Amarjit Singhuber India Systems Vs. The Dcit(Tds)-2(3) Private Limited Smt. K.G. Mittal Unit 41/46, Floor 3 Ayurvedic Hospital Paragon, Phoenix Market Building, City, Lbs Marg, Charni Road (West) Kurla (W), Mumbai - 400002 Mumbai – 400070 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aabcu6223H Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : J.D. Mistry & Hiten Chande Respondent By : Achal Sharma

For Appellant: J.D. Mistry &For Respondent: Achal Sharma
Section 194Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 206A

TDS)-2(3) department to conclude that UISPL is required to withhold taxes under Section 194C of the Act on disbursements to Driver-Partners:- (1) UISPL should be the 'person responsible for paying' as per provisions of Section 204

UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. JT.CIT (TDS)(OSD)-2(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 5862/MUM/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Mar 2021AY 2016-17
Section 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 206ASection 251(2)

section 204 of the Act as it has not entered into any agreement with the Driver-Partners as stated supra. 3.5.7. We find that the reliance placed by the ld AR on the following decisions are very well founded and directly supports the view that a person being a mere remitter of money cannot be held to be a person

MANISH TOWER CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC TDS THROUGH ITO TDS 1(3)(4), UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

ITA 4358/MUM/2015[2015-16(26Q-Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Sept 2016

Bench: Shri Rajendra & Shri C.N. Prasadआयकर अपील सं /I.Ta No.4358/Mum/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Manish Tower Co- The Dcit (Tds), बनाम/ Operative Hsg Soc.Ltd., Centralized Processing Unit Vs. Jay Prakash Road, Cell Tds Andheri (W), Ghaziabad U.P. -201 010 Mumbai-400 053 Through Ito Tds 1(3)(4) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.Aaaam 6288P .. (""यथ" / Respondent) (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By: None Shri N. Sathya Moorthy ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By:

For Appellant: None
Section 190Section 200ASection 204Section 234E

TDS statements u/s. 200A of the Act is applicable from prospective date i.e. w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Accordingly, fee u/s.234E cannot be levied prior to 01.06.2015. 1.2.3 In not appreciating the fact that provision of section 204

DCIT (OSD)(TDS)-2(3), MUMBAI vs. TOTAL ENERGIES MARKETING INDIA PVT LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 132/MUM/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, &For Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das &
Section 14Section 17Section 194HSection 201Section 36Section 4Section 6

TDS section 201 section 201 default under (1A) of ₹ (1) of ₹ section 201 (1) 3,562,616 45,760,000 of ₹ and interest 1,97,79,204

DCIT (OSD)(TDS)-2(3), MUMBAI vs. TOTAL ENERGIES MARKETINGS INDIA PVT LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 127/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, &For Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das &
Section 14Section 17Section 194HSection 201Section 36Section 4Section 6

TDS section 201 section 201 default under (1A) of ₹ (1) of ₹ section 201 (1) 3,562,616 45,760,000 of ₹ and interest 1,97,79,204

DCIT (OSD)(TDS)-2(3), MUMBAI vs. TOTAL ENERGIES MARKETING INDIA PVT LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 133/MUM/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, &For Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das &
Section 14Section 17Section 194HSection 201Section 36Section 4Section 6

TDS section 201 section 201 default under (1A) of ₹ (1) of ₹ section 201 (1) 3,562,616 45,760,000 of ₹ and interest 1,97,79,204

DCIT (OSD)(TDS)-2(3) , MUMBAI vs. TOTAL ENERGIES MARKETING INDIA PVT LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 131/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, &For Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das &
Section 14Section 17Section 194HSection 201Section 36Section 4Section 6

TDS section 201 section 201 default under (1A) of ₹ (1) of ₹ section 201 (1) 3,562,616 45,760,000 of ₹ and interest 1,97,79,204

DCIT (OSD)(TDS)-2(3), MUMBAI vs. TOTAL ENERGIES MARKETING INDIA PVT LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 130/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, &For Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das &
Section 14Section 17Section 194HSection 201Section 36Section 4Section 6

TDS section 201 section 201 default under (1A) of ₹ (1) of ₹ section 201 (1) 3,562,616 45,760,000 of ₹ and interest 1,97,79,204

DCIT (OSD)(TDS)-2(3), MUMBAI vs. TOTAL ENERGIES MARKETING INDIA PVT LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 129/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, &For Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das &
Section 14Section 17Section 194HSection 201Section 36Section 4Section 6

TDS section 201 section 201 default under (1A) of ₹ (1) of ₹ section 201 (1) 3,562,616 45,760,000 of ₹ and interest 1,97,79,204

DCIT (OSD)(TDS)-2(3) , MUMBAI vs. TOTAL ENERGIES MARKETING INDIA PVT LTD, MUMBAI

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 128/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, &For Respondent: Shri Biswanath Das &
Section 14Section 17Section 194HSection 201Section 36Section 4Section 6

TDS section 201 section 201 default under (1A) of ₹ (1) of ₹ section 201 (1) 3,562,616 45,760,000 of ₹ and interest 1,97,79,204

ROTEX MANUFACTURERS AND ENGINEERS PVT LTD,RABALE, NAVI MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, THANE, THANE WEST

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4461/MUM/2023[2014-15 (Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 May 2024

Bench: Shri Girish Agrawal & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Kapadia, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 194JSection 197Section 197(2)Section 204

TDS Officers of the Deductees have issued certificate under Section 197 of the Act to the Principal Officer of Your Appellant. Such certificates are in terms of clause (iii) of Section 204

ROTEX MANUFACTURERS AND ENGINEERS PVT LTD,RABALE, NAVI MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, THANE, THANE WEST

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4464/MUM/2023[2014-15(Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 May 2024

Bench: Shri Girish Agrawal & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Kapadia, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 194JSection 197Section 197(2)Section 204

TDS Officers of the Deductees have issued certificate under Section 197 of the Act to the Principal Officer of Your Appellant. Such certificates are in terms of clause (iii) of Section 204

ROTEX MANUFACTURERS AND ENGINEERS PVT LTD,RABALE, NAVI MUMBAI vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, THANE, THANE WEST

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4458/MUM/2023[2014-15(Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 May 2024

Bench: Shri Girish Agrawal & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Kapadia, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 194JSection 197Section 197(2)Section 204

TDS Officers of the Deductees have issued certificate under Section 197 of the Act to the Principal Officer of Your Appellant. Such certificates are in terms of clause (iii) of Section 204

TAMIL NADU HANDLOOM WEAVERS CO -= OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) - 2(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as indicated above

ITA 3712/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri N.K. Pradhan

For Respondent: None
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 254(1)

TDS)-2(3)(2), Co-operative Society Ltd., Mumbai. 204, Udyog Mandir No.2, 7-C, Pitamber Lane, Mahim (W), Vs. Mumbai-400016 PAN: AAAAH2788P Appellant Respondent : None Appellant by Revenue by : Shri Amit Pratap Singh (DR) Date of Hearing : 01.10.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 22.10.2020 ORDER UNDER SECTION

DCIT (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI vs. PFIZER LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the revenue as well as cross objection of the assessee i

ITA 5053/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 May 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma & Shri Sanjay Gargआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.5053 To 5057/Mum/2013 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years :2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" 2008-09 & 2009-10) Dcit(Tds)-2(2), Room Vs. M/S Pfizer Limited, Pfizer 7Th No.703, Floor, Smt. Centre, Patel Estate, K.G.Mittal Ayurvedic Hospital S.V.Road, Jogeshwari Building, Charni Road, (West), Mumbai-400102 Mumbai-400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacp 3334 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2450/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2009-10) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit (Tds)-2(2), Room Vs. M/S Pfizer Limited, Pfizer 7Th No.703, Floor, Smt. Centre, Patel Estate, K.G.Mittal Ayurvedic Hospital S.V.Road, Jogeshwari Building, Charni Road, (West), Mumbai-400102 Mumbai-400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacp 3334 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection No.141/Mum/2015 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2009-10) वष" M/S Pfizer Limited, Pfizer Vs. Acit (Tds)-2(2), Room No.703, 7Th Floor, Smt. K.G.Mittal Ayurvedic Centre, Patel Estate, S.V.Road, Jogeshwari Hospital Building, Charni Road, (West), Mumbai-400102 Mumbai-400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacp 3334 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. राज"व क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By ओर : Shri S.Pandian िनधा"रती क" क" क" ओर क" ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर ओर : Shri Kirit Kamdar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 29/02/2016 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 25/05/2016

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)

204/- on which TDS is not deductible on the following grounds: a) Purchase of various materials. b) Expenditure on food and travelling c) Availability of tax exemption certificate d) Payment of regulatory fees. Prima facie TDS is not deductible on all the four items mentioned above. However, this particular break up has not been provided to AO. I therefore, direct

ASST CIT (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI vs. PFIZER LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the revenue as well as cross objection of the assessee i

ITA 2450/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 May 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma & Shri Sanjay Gargआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.5053 To 5057/Mum/2013 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years :2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" 2008-09 & 2009-10) Dcit(Tds)-2(2), Room Vs. M/S Pfizer Limited, Pfizer 7Th No.703, Floor, Smt. Centre, Patel Estate, K.G.Mittal Ayurvedic Hospital S.V.Road, Jogeshwari Building, Charni Road, (West), Mumbai-400102 Mumbai-400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacp 3334 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2450/Mum/2014 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2009-10) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Acit (Tds)-2(2), Room Vs. M/S Pfizer Limited, Pfizer 7Th No.703, Floor, Smt. Centre, Patel Estate, K.G.Mittal Ayurvedic Hospital S.V.Road, Jogeshwari Building, Charni Road, (West), Mumbai-400102 Mumbai-400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacp 3334 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection No.141/Mum/2015 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2009-10) वष" M/S Pfizer Limited, Pfizer Vs. Acit (Tds)-2(2), Room No.703, 7Th Floor, Smt. K.G.Mittal Ayurvedic Centre, Patel Estate, S.V.Road, Jogeshwari Hospital Building, Charni Road, (West), Mumbai-400102 Mumbai-400002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacp 3334 M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. राज"व क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By ओर : Shri S.Pandian िनधा"रती क" क" क" ओर क" ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर ओर : Shri Kirit Kamdar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 29/02/2016 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 25/05/2016

Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)

204/- on which TDS is not deductible on the following grounds: a) Purchase of various materials. b) Expenditure on food and travelling c) Availability of tax exemption certificate d) Payment of regulatory fees. Prima facie TDS is not deductible on all the four items mentioned above. However, this particular break up has not been provided to AO. I therefore, direct

ROSE ROCK REAL ESTATE INDIA PVT.,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, these appeals are allowed

ITA 4824/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Sept 2021AY 2013-14
Section 154Section 190Section 200ASection 203ASection 204Section 234ESection 285

TDS quarterly statement cannot be recovered by way of processing under section sec 200A. Therefore demand notice cannot be issued under this section, but if issued, then it is illegal. Hence liable to be cancelled. 3. That the Provisions of Sec. 204

INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) III(3),, MUMBAI vs. M/S PETROLEUM INDIA INTERNATIONAL , MUMBAI

ITA 5913/MUM/2000[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Mar 2023AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri B.K. Bagchi, D.R
Section 194Section 194JSection 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 5(2)(b)Section 9(1)

TDS was deductable under section 194J of the Act by relying upon the provisions contained in the Explanation 2 of section 9(1) of the Act by treating the same as fee for technical services on the ground that as per agreement on record between PII and overseas clients it is assessee/PII who is responsible for providing the technical services

ITO, TDS III (3) , MUMBAI vs. M/S PETROLEUM INDIA INTERNATIONAL, MUMBAI

ITA 5912/MUM/2000[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Mar 2023AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri B.K. Bagchi, D.R
Section 194Section 194JSection 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 5(2)(b)Section 9(1)

TDS was deductable under section 194J of the Act by relying upon the provisions contained in the Explanation 2 of section 9(1) of the Act by treating the same as fee for technical services on the ground that as per agreement on record between PII and overseas clients it is assessee/PII who is responsible for providing the technical services