BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 195Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai7Cuttack2Mumbai2Bangalore1Delhi1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 271C5Section 2712TDS2

DCIT 13(3)(2) MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. RAJ ARCADES HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED (AAFCR6616R), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3575/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2025AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 195J

195J. Payment\nthrough bank, GST\nhas been levied on\nthe services offered.\nVrinda\n2,50,000/-\n----do---\nVishwan\nKumbhat\n1,00,00,000/-\nOut of payments of Rs.\nKumbhat\nAdvisors\nPvt Ltd\n1,07,50,000/-\nthe\nthrough\nAdvisors\ntheir\npayment of\nRs.\n7,50,000/-\nis\nconsidered\nreasonable under\npromoter CA Neeraj\nKumbhat and their\nas associate

ASST (TDS) 3(1), MUMBAI vs. UNITED HEALTHCARE INDIA P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, with aforesaid directions both the appeals filed by

ITA 7402/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri Neil PhilipFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Sodhani
Section 133ASection 194JSection 271Section 271C

TDS was to be made u/s 7 ITA Nos.7402 & 7403(M)2013 194J or not and hence the appellants were under bonafide belief that they are not required to deduct tax. The appellant has then also pleaded that though Assessing Officer has relied upon this very decision of Hon'ble’ Bombay High Court for levying penalty only for the reason