BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

337 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai337Delhi302Bangalore106Kolkata105Chennai79Jaipur40Indore39Ahmedabad39Hyderabad38Karnataka27Cuttack25Pune22Rajkot21Chandigarh20Amritsar10Cochin9Surat7Patna7Raipur6Visakhapatnam6Lucknow5Telangana4Jabalpur3SC3Calcutta3Guwahati3Allahabad3Nagpur3Jodhpur2Kerala2Ranchi2Panaji1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 194H145Section 40115Section 201109Deduction72TDS65Section 201(1)58Section 143(3)54Section 194J54Disallowance50Addition to Income

CHEMOX EXPORTS IMPORTS PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ASSESSMENT UNIT, DELHI

ITA 3954/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon'Ble & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan, Hon'Bleι.Τ.Α. No. 3954/Mum/2024

For Appellant: Ms. Jigna Jain, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. D/R
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

194H TDS Statement - Commission or brokerage (Section AASFP5902G PAGODA WOODS LLP 800000.00 40000.00 TDS-194H 194H) AAGPA7378B SUNITA AGARWAL 800000.00 40000.00 TDS

ACIT 16(1), MUMBAI vs. ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Showing 1–20 of 337 · Page 1 of 17

...
35
Section 25029
Section 194C29
ITA 812/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.852/Mum/2016 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) बिाम/ Entertainment Network Acit 16(1), Room No. 439, 4T H Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, (India) Ltd., M.K Road, 4T H Floor, A Wing, V. Mumbai- 400020 Matulya Centre, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai-400013 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aaace7796G आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.812/Mum/2016 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) बिाम/ Acit 16(1), Room No. 439, Entertainment Network 4T H Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, (India) Ltd., M.K Road, Mumbai 400020 4T H Floor, A Wing, V. Matulya Centre, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel(West), Mumbai-400013 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aaace7796G (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri. R. Manjunatha Swamy &
Section 143(3)Section 14A

TDS under section 194H. The Department, on the other hand, has taken the stand in some cases that since the advertising

ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT RG 11(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 852/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.852/Mum/2016 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) बिाम/ Entertainment Network Acit 16(1), Room No. 439, 4T H Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, (India) Ltd., M.K Road, 4T H Floor, A Wing, V. Mumbai- 400020 Matulya Centre, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai-400013 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan :Aaace7796G आयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.812/Mum/2016 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) बिाम/ Acit 16(1), Room No. 439, Entertainment Network 4T H Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, (India) Ltd., M.K Road, Mumbai 400020 4T H Floor, A Wing, V. Matulya Centre, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel(West), Mumbai-400013 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aaace7796G (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri. R. Manjunatha Swamy &
Section 143(3)Section 14A

TDS under section 194H. The Department, on the other hand, has taken the stand in some cases that since the advertising

DCIT 9(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. FUTURA VALUE RETAIL LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA no

ITA 6705/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.N Prasad & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.6705/Mum/2016 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) बिाम/ Acit-9(3)(2), M/S. Future Value 418, 4Th Floor, Retail Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Knowledge House, V. Mumbai-400020 Shyam Nagar, Off Jogeshwari Vikhroli Link Road, Jogeshwari (E), Mumbai-400060 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan: Aaecp3041P (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Revenue By: Shri. Sushil Kumar Poddar (Dr) Assessee By: Ms. Dinkle Hariya सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 12.06.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.07.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar: This Appeal, Filed By Revenue, Being Ita No. 6705/Mum/2016, Is Directed Against Appellate Order Dated 23.08.2016, Passed By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-16,Mumbai (Hereinafter Called “The Cit(A)”) In Ita No. Cit(A)/ I.T.305/Dcit-9(3)(2)/2015-16, For Assessment Year 2012-13, The Appellate Proceedings Had Arisen Before Learned Cit(A) From Assessment Order Dated 29.03.2015 Passed By Learned Assessing Officer (Hereinafter Called “The Ao”) U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act”) For Ay 2012-13. I.T.A. No.6705/Mum/2016

For Appellant: Ms. Dinkle HariyaFor Respondent: Shri. Sushil Kumar Poddar (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194HSection 194JSection 40

section 194H of the Act and hence no TDS is required to be deducted u/s 194H of the Act. Respectfully

ADDL CIT 7(2), MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6726/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Mar 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40a

TDS under section 194H. The failure to deduct TDS by the assessee, entails disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). In response

TATA SKY LTD.,MUMBAI vs. A.C.I.T.(TDS) RG.3(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed and the Revenue’s appeal stands

ITA 6923/MUM/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sunil M. LalaFor Respondent: Shri R. Manjunatha Swamy
Section 194CSection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

section 194H, the appellant can collect the net sale proceeds along with TDS element from the distributors/dealers while collecting payments

DCIT(TDS)-1(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. HOUSE OF ANITA DONGRE PVT LTD, BANDRA WEST

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 5165/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: BEFOR SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 29

Section 194H do not get attracted. It was further submitted that TDS under Section 194H is required only if either

DCIT(TDS)OSD-1(2), MUMBAI, CUMBALLA HILL vs. HOUSE OF ANITA DONGRE PVT LTD, BANDRA WEST

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 5211/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: BEFOR SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 29

Section 194H do not get attracted. It was further submitted that TDS under Section 194H is required only if either

DCIT(TDS)OSD-1(2), MUMBAI, CUMBALLA HILL vs. HOUSE OF ANITA DONGRE PVT LTD, BANDRA WEST

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 5210/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: BEFOR SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 29

Section 194H do not get attracted. It was further submitted that TDS under Section 194H is required only if either

ASUS INDIA PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. THE LD. ADDL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ACIT/ ITO, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2427/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm Asus India Private Limited The Learned. 402, Supreme Chambers, Addl/Joint/Deputy/Acit/Ito 17-18 Shah Industrial Estate, Room No.305, Ara Centre 2-E Veera Desai Road, Vs. Jhandewalan Extn, New Delhi, Andheri (West), Delhi-110055 Mumbai-400 053 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aajca6450C Assessee By : Mr. Vijay Mehta, Adv. Revenue By : Mr. Nihar Ranjan Samal, Sr. Ar Date Of Hearing: 19.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 16.08.2023

For Appellant: Mr. Vijay Mehta, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Nihar Ranjan Samal, Sr. AR
Section 115JSection 143Section 144BSection 144CSection 194Section 194CSection 194HSection 40

section 194H of the Act. 37. The learned Departmental Representative submitted, firstly the expenditure claimed by the assessee is merely a provision. Therefore, it cannot be allowed as expenditure. Further, he ITA No. 2427/Mum/2022; Asus India Private Ltd; 2018-19 submitted, even if it is a provision still since the assessee has claimed it as deduction, TDS

ITO (TDS) 2(3), MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPEMENT CORPORATION LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5232/MUM/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Oct 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri D. Karunakar Raoassessment Year: 2011-12 Income Tax Officer(Tds)- M/S Maharashtra Tourism 2(3), Development Corporation Ltd. बनाम/ R. No.708, 7Th Floor, Express Tower, 9Th Floor, Vs. Smt. K.G. Mittal Ayurvedic Madam Cama Road, Hospital Building, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021 Mumbai-400002 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती /Assessee) Pan. No.Aaacm0712G

Section 133ASection 194Section 194HSection 201(1)

section 194H of the Act, therefore, no TDS is required to be deducted u/s 194H of the Act. Thus, the issue

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR TO SPICE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED),MUMBAI vs. DY. CIT, CIRCLE- 3(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3425/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Is Interconnected With Ground No.Ii. Hence, They Are Taken Up Together For Disposal.

Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40Section 40a

TDS. Even on an indirect payment stemming from the consumer, the Assessees would remain liable under the IT Act. However, the assessee contends that in the case before Hon'ble SC, the fact that section 1941 applies in that case was not under dispute as regards the standard commission. Once section 194H

DCIT TDS 1(1), MUMBAI vs. BHARAT BUSINESS CHANNELS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in both the years are allowed

ITA 7047/MUM/2012[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm

Section 194CSection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

TDS by treating the appellant as an assessee in default in respect of non deduction of tax at source on trade discount of Rs 51,67,60,486 granted to prepaid distributors by holding the same as commission and hence liable for deduction of tax at source under the provisions of Section 194H

DCIT (OSD) 8(1), MUMBAI vs. FUTURE VALUE RETAIL LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA N0

ITA 2612/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2612/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11) Dy. Commissioner Of Income बनाम/ M/S Future Value Retail Tax (Osd), Range 8(1), Ltd., V. Room No. 260A, 2 Nd Floor, Knowledge House, Aayakar Bhavan, Shyam Nagar, M.K. Road, Off Jvlr, Mumbai 400 020. Jogeshwari (E), Mumbai- 400 072. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan : Aaecp3041P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vipul Joshi
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 194HSection 260ASection 40Section 40(1)(ia)

section 194H of the Act and hence no TDS is required to be deducted u/s 194H of the Act. The CIT(A) also

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI CITY vs. ITO (TDS)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, in the present batch of appeals for the assessment years

ITA 1929/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala/Shri Paras SalvaFor Respondent: Dr. Kishore Dhule/Shri R. A. Dhyani
Section 194Section 194ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS should have been deducted under section 194) (if on principal-to-principal basis) or alternatively under section 194H (if on principal

DCIT (TDS), CIRCLE-2(2), MUMBAI vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI

In the result, in the present batch of appeals for the assessment years

ITA 1901/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala/Shri Paras SalvaFor Respondent: Dr. Kishore Dhule/Shri R. A. Dhyani
Section 194Section 194ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS should have been deducted under section 194) (if on principal-to-principal basis) or alternatively under section 194H (if on principal

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, in the present batch of appeals for the assessment years

ITA 1925/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala/Shri Paras SalvaFor Respondent: Dr. Kishore Dhule/Shri R. A. Dhyani
Section 194Section 194ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS should have been deducted under section 194) (if on principal-to-principal basis) or alternatively under section 194H (if on principal

DCIT (TDS), CIRCLE-2(2), MUMBAI vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI

In the result, in the present batch of appeals for the assessment years

ITA 1903/MUM/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 May 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala/Shri Paras SalvaFor Respondent: Dr. Kishore Dhule/Shri R. A. Dhyani
Section 194Section 194ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS should have been deducted under section 194) (if on principal-to-principal basis) or alternatively under section 194H (if on principal

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI CITY vs. ITO (TDS)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, in the present batch of appeals for the assessment years

ITA 1931/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala/Shri Paras SalvaFor Respondent: Dr. Kishore Dhule/Shri R. A. Dhyani
Section 194Section 194ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS should have been deducted under section 194) (if on principal-to-principal basis) or alternatively under section 194H (if on principal

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, in the present batch of appeals for the assessment years

ITA 1927/MUM/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 May 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri P. J. Pardiwala/Shri Paras SalvaFor Respondent: Dr. Kishore Dhule/Shri R. A. Dhyani
Section 194Section 194ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS should have been deducted under section 194) (if on principal-to-principal basis) or alternatively under section 194H (if on principal