STATE BANK OF INDIA ,MUMBAI vs. ADDL.CIT-TDS,RANGE2(2), MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 5548/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Feb 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanassessment Year 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Tanzil R. Padvekar & Shri Prabhanjan B. GujarFor Respondent: Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj Ramesh, Sr. DR
Section 10(5)Section 192BSection 201Section 201(1)Section 270CSection 271CSection 273BSection 274
192B of the Act for not deducting tax on account of LTC payment which was not allowable according to the provisions of section 10(5) of the Act. During the course of appellate proceedings before us, the ld. Counsel referred the decision of ITAT Jaipur
Bench in the case of State Bank of India vs ACIT, (TDS