BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 192Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi20Chennai5Ahmedabad4Bangalore4Indore4Mumbai2Surat1Panaji1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 271C6Section 234B3Section 201(1)3Section 10(5)2Section 192B2

OWENS CORNING INSULATING SYSTEMS CANADA LP,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (IT) CIRCLE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 461/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Bhalla a/wFor Respondent: Shri Soumendu Kumar Dash
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 234Section 234BSection 254Section 9(1)(vii)

Section 192 of the Act against salary and other allowances paid/payable to such seconded employees and deposited the same with the Government of India. This is evident from Form No. 16 issued by GIPL to its employees, which are placed on Owens Corning Insulating Systems Canada LP ITA no.461/Mum./2022 record (refer pages

STATE BANK OF INDIA ,MUMBAI vs. ADDL.CIT-TDS,RANGE2(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5548/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanassessment Year 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Tanzil R. Padvekar & Shri Prabhanjan B. GujarFor Respondent: Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj Ramesh, Sr. DR
Section 10(5)Section 192BSection 201Section 201(1)Section 270CSection 271CSection 273BSection 274

192B of the Act for not deducting tax on account of LTC payment which was not allowable according to the provisions of section 10(5) of the Act. During the course of appellate proceedings before us, the ld. Counsel referred the decision of ITAT Jaipur Bench in the case of State Bank of India vs ACIT, (TDS