BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 142Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh26Agra19Delhi6Bangalore5Jaipur4Lucknow4Mumbai3Hyderabad2Rajkot1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 43B7Section 143(3)3Section 271(1)(c)2Section 1482Section 133(6)2Section 682Disallowance2Addition to Income2

DCIT-CC-7(3), MUMBAI , MUMBAI vs. SHRI MAJNI KARAMSHI PATEL, MUMBAI

In the result, the cross objections of the assessee and the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6128/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Gagan Goyal, Accountat Member Dcit, Cc-7(3) Vs. Shri Manji Karamshi Room No. 655, Patel Aayakar Bhavan, Office No. 1, Patel M.K.Road, Bhavan-29, Vijaywadi, Mumbai.-400020. Dr. Nagindas N Shah Lane Chira Bazar, Mumbai – 400002. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpp0130D Appellant .. Respondent Co No. 45/Mum/2021 (A.Y: 2014-15) Shri Manji Karamshi Vs. Dcit, Cc-7(3) Patel Room No. 655, Aayakar Office No. 1, Patel Bhavan, Bhuvan-29, Vijaywadi, M.K .Road, Dr. Nagindas N Shah Mumbai-400002. Lane Chira Bazar, Mumbai – 400002. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpp0130D Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri.Rushab Mehta.ARFor Respondent: Shri .T .Shankar.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

TDS on interest paid to M/s. Galore Supplier Pvt Ltd, M/s. Landmark Supplier Pvt ITA No. 6128/Mum/2019 & Co. No. 45/Mum/2021 Shri Majni Karmshi Patel, Mumbai. Ltd (amalgamated with S.K. Stock Dealers Pvt Ltd) & M/s. Kingfisher Properties Pvt Ltd as the appellant is not liable to get his books of accounts audited u/s 44AB of the Act. Further, the Id. Assessing

DCIT 1(3), MUMBAI vs. RANK MERCANTILE P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 5365/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Rajesh Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Niraj ShethFor Respondent: Shri B.S. Bist
Section 133(6)

TDS on the payment to Vaibhav Engineers which were deposited to Government account. It is also evident that the notice issued under section 133(6) by the Assessing Officer in the course of remand proceeding was served on Vaibhav Engineers. Merely because in response to the said notice, the party did not appear before the Assessing Officer, the payment made

DCIT 5(2), MUMBAI vs. JET AIRWAYS (I) LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee for AY 2003-04 being ITA No

ITA 6597/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Feb 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Sh. Rajendra & Pawan Singhआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.6596/Mum/2014,"नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year-2003-04 Jet Airways (India) Ltd. Dcit-5(2) बनाम Siroya Centre, Sahar Airport Aayakar Bhavan, Road, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020 Vs. Mumbai-400099. Pan: Aaacj0920H (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.6597/Mum/2014,"नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year-2007-08 Dcit-5(2) Jet Airways (India) Ltd. बनाम Aayakar Bhavan, Siroya Centre, Sahar Airport Mumbai-400020 Road, Andheri (E), Vs. Mumbai-400099. Pan: Aaacj0920H (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) राज"व ओर से / Revenue By : Ms Anu Krishna Aggarwal With Alok Johri (Dr) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri Vijaya Mehta (Ar) सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 05-01-2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख / Date Of Pronouncement : 01-02-2017 आयकर अ"ध"नयम, 1961 क" धारा 254(1) के अ"तग"त आदेश Order U/S.254(1)Of The Income-Tax Act,1961(Act) Per Pawan Singh, J.M. "या"यक सद"य Iou Iou Iou "संह के अनुसार: Iou 1. These Two Appeals By Assessee U/S 253 Of The Income Tax Act (The Act) Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Even Day Of Ld. Cit(A)-9, Mumbai Dated 28.08.2014 For Assessment Years (Ays) 2003-04 & 2007-08. 2. In Ita No. 6896/Mum/2014, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri Vijaya Mehta (AR)For Respondent: Ms Anu Krishna Aggarwal with Alok Johri (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 253Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 43B

section only in respect of ‘concealment of income’ and not for ‘ inaccurate particulars of income’. The ld. AR of the assessee further argued that assessee assessed the total loss of Rs. 473 Crore and assessee has no intention to make incorrect claim on account of Rs. 1.69 Crore when the amount is admittedly allowable and the issue was only