BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3,038 results for “TDS”+ Section 13(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,187Mumbai3,038Bangalore1,765Chennai992Kolkata803Pune629Indore548Ahmedabad537Hyderabad508Jaipur373Chandigarh338Cochin271Raipur256Karnataka235Visakhapatnam180Surat143Nagpur128Cuttack107Rajkot100Lucknow92Amritsar56Ranchi54Dehradun50Jabalpur42Panaji40Guwahati37Agra31Allahabad30Patna29Jodhpur26SC19Telangana17Kerala13Varanasi10Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan5Calcutta5Orissa2Uttarakhand2J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)62Addition to Income44Section 4043TDS43Deduction39Section 14733Disallowance30Section 201(1)28Section 26328Section 250

OBEROI FOUNDATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (E), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3469/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Bleoberoi Foundation V. Cit (Exemptions) Commerz, 3Rd Floor 6Th Floor, Piramal Chambers International Business Park Lalbaug, Mumbai – 400 012 Oberoi Garden City, Off. W.E. Highway Goregaon (E), Mumbai - 400063 Pan: Aaato1684L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shri Vijay Mehta Department Represented By : Shri K.C. Salvamani

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263o

TDS compliance. The real issue raised by the assessee in this appeal is whether the provisions of section 11 is applicable and in the subsequent proceedings, the Assessing Officer has verified the allowability of the rent and he has not properly verified the same. In our view, the venturing in the subsequent proceedings are beyond the scope of the grounds

Showing 1–20 of 3,038 · Page 1 of 152

...
24
Section 14824
Section 1023

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION)- 1(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6953/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION)- 1(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6952/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3800/MUM/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-43 OR CIT CENTRAL 4, MUMBAI

ITA 3083/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION)- 1(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6954/MUM/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-43 OR CIT VENTRAL 4, MUMBAI

ITA 3081/MUM/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3794/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3793/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3795/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-43 OR CIT CENTRAL 4, MUMBAI

ITA 3084/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, MUMBAI

ITA 3080/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-43 OR CIT CENTRAL 4, MUMBAI

ITA 3082/MUM/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3801/MUM/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

ASST CIT CC 43, MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST, MUMBAI

ITA 1336/MUM/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2015AY 2003-04

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 13(1)(c) still corpus donation were not taxable. b) R.B. Shreeram Religious & Charitable Trust Vs. CIT (SC) 233 ITR 0053 c) CIT vs. Indore Table Tennis Trust 227 ITR 0836 (MP) d) CIT vs. Bengal Mills & Stemers PRE. Association 140 ITR 0586 (Call) e) CIT vs. Vanchi Trust & Anr. 127 ITR 0227 (Kerala) f) CIT vs. Bal Utkarsh

MUMBAI METROPLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (E) -1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and revenue is dismissed

ITA 4395/MUM/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jan 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh SoparkarFor Respondent: Shri Parag Vyas
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

13 of the |. T. Act, 1961. 2) The MMRDA was created as a Local Authority within the meaning of term “person” for the purpose of Income-tax Act, 1961 and with effect from its inception to 2002. The MMRDA continues to be Local Authority in the eyes of law. It cannot be considered as a Public Trust or Charitable Trust

MUMBAI METROPLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (E) -1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and revenue is dismissed

ITA 4392/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh SoparkarFor Respondent: Shri Parag Vyas
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

13 of the |. T. Act, 1961. 2) The MMRDA was created as a Local Authority within the meaning of term “person” for the purpose of Income-tax Act, 1961 and with effect from its inception to 2002. The MMRDA continues to be Local Authority in the eyes of law. It cannot be considered as a Public Trust or Charitable Trust

MUMBAI METROPLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (E) -1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and revenue is dismissed

ITA 4393/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh SoparkarFor Respondent: Shri Parag Vyas
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

13 of the |. T. Act, 1961. 2) The MMRDA was created as a Local Authority within the meaning of term “person” for the purpose of Income-tax Act, 1961 and with effect from its inception to 2002. The MMRDA continues to be Local Authority in the eyes of law. It cannot be considered as a Public Trust or Charitable Trust

MUMBAI METROPLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (E) -1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and revenue is dismissed

ITA 4394/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh SoparkarFor Respondent: Shri Parag Vyas
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

13 of the |. T. Act, 1961. 2) The MMRDA was created as a Local Authority within the meaning of term “person” for the purpose of Income-tax Act, 1961 and with effect from its inception to 2002. The MMRDA continues to be Local Authority in the eyes of law. It cannot be considered as a Public Trust or Charitable Trust

MUMBAI METROPLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MUMBAI vs. DDIT (E) -1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and revenue is dismissed

ITA 4391/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jan 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh SoparkarFor Respondent: Shri Parag Vyas
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

13 of the |. T. Act, 1961. 2) The MMRDA was created as a Local Authority within the meaning of term “person” for the purpose of Income-tax Act, 1961 and with effect from its inception to 2002. The MMRDA continues to be Local Authority in the eyes of law. It cannot be considered as a Public Trust or Charitable Trust