BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 11Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore8Delhi7Telangana6Mumbai5Kolkata2Karnataka2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 115J19Section 809Section 37(1)4Section 143(1)4Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Section 88E3Section 1483Section 1472Disallowance2

ACIT 2(1), MUMBAI vs. CHOKHANI SECURITIES LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 6602/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri G.S.Pannu & Shri Pawan Singhita No. 6603/Mum/2012 (Assessment Year : 2008-09)

For Appellant: Shri B.S.BistFor Respondent: Shri Jayesh Dedhia
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 88ESection 94(7)

TDS etc. The A.O. wants to compare the net tax payable after reduction of STT with 10% of book-profit, but such a comparison is not warranted u/s. 115JB because STT is like any other tax paid and it is not to be reduced from the tax liability before comparison with 10% of book-profit. STT is allowed deduction from

GODREJ TYSON FOODS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT RANGE 14(1)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 6672/MUM/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Feb 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 6672/Mum/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2016-17)

For Appellant: Shri M. M. Golwala & ShriFor Respondent: Shri V. Vinod Kumar, DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)

11b 0 c For deferment of advance tax (section 234C) 11c 0 d Total Interest Payable (11a+11b+11c) 11d 0 0 12 Aggregate liability (10 + 11d) 12 13 Taxes Paid a Advance Tax (from Schedule-IT) 13a 0 TAXES PAID b TDS

DCIT CIR 3(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. ANIL DHIRAJLAL AMBANI, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3676/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm Dcit – Circle 3(3)(1) Vs. Shri Anil Dhirajlal Ambani Room No.609, 39, Sea Wind 6Th Floor Cuffe Parade Aayakar Bhavan Colaba, M.K.Road, Mumbai – 400 005 Mumbai – 400 020 Pan/Gir No. Aad[A3703D Appellant) Respondent) ..

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

11B of the SEBI Act read with Regulations 11 of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations,2003. 35. However, as per para 9 of the order of the Tribunal in case of Reliance Share and Stock Borkers Pvt. Ltd., we found that SEBI has initiated action u/s.11 of the SEBI Act. However

TATA CHEMICALS LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 2(3), MUMBAI

In the result additional ground raised by the assessee vide additional ground number 3 and ground number 5 of the appeal is allowed

ITA 2439/MUM/2011[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Feb 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm & Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tata Chemicals Limited Tax 2(3), Bombay House Aayakar Bhavan, Fort, Vs. M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Respondent) (Appellant) Pan No. Aaact4059M Appellant By : Shri Nitesh Joshi, Ar Respondent By : Shri Milind Chavan, Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.12.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 16.02.2022

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Milind Chavan, DR
Section 41Section 80

TDS and advance tax payments of HLCL were not considered. The effective date of amalgamation was June 01, 2004 and the appointed date of amalgamation was April 01, 2002 i.e. HLCL amalgamated with the assessee w.e.f. April 2002. After amalgamation, the assessee filed a revised return of income for the financial year 2002-03 relevant to the impugned assessment year

RENFRO INDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 10(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal is allowed

ITA 1895/MUM/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri N.K. Pradhan

For Appellant: Shri Mahaveer JainFor Respondent: Shri D.G. Pansari

11B, Vaibhav Apartments, 80 Bhulabhai Desai Road, Mumbai - 400026 do hereby solemnly affirm on oath and declare as follows: - 1. That I am the director and Chairman of appellant- Company having its office at 609, Mahalaxmi Chambers, 22, Bhulabhai Desai Road, Mumbai-4000026. 2. That for Assessment Year 2005-06, the appellant- company had preferred an appeal before