BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 115Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6Ahmedabad3Chandigarh3Kolkata3Delhi1SC1

Key Topics

Section 4410Section 69C6Section 234A6Section 143(3)4Section 234B4Disallowance4Addition to Income4Natural Justice4Business Income3Section 37(1)2Section 14A2Section 102

RGA INTERNATIONAL REINSURANCE COMPANY DESIGNATED ACTIVITY CO,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-4(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the issue under consideration is remitted back to the file of Assessing Officer for statistical purpose

ITA 1022/MUM/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blerga International Reinsurance V. Dcit (International Taxation) -4(1)(1) Room No. 172, 17Th Floor Company Designated Activity Air India Building, Nariman Point Company Mumbai – 400 021 C/O. S.R.B.C & Associates Llp 14Th Floor, The Ruby 29 Senapati Bapat Marg Dadar (W), Mumbai – 400028 Pan: Aadcr1226K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented By : Shri P.S. Paridiwala & Ms. Jasmin Amalasadvala Department Represented By : Ms. Surabhi Sharma

Section 115BSection 144C(5)Section 9(1)(i)

115B of the Act. 8. Ground 8 The learned AO has, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, and based on the directions of the Hon'ble DRP, erred in levying interest under section 234B of the Act. 9. Ground 9 The learned AO has, on the facts and circumstances of the case

DCIT-CC-5(3), MUMBAI, AIR INDIA, NARIMAN POINT vs. ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and that of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3044/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Oct 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2021-22 Aditya Birla Sunlife Insurance Commissioner Of Income Tax Company Ltd., (A) – 54, 16Th Floor, Tower 1, One World Mumbai Vs. Centre, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, Mumbai – 400013 (Pan : Aabcb4623J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2021-22 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Aditya Birla Sunlife Tax – Central Circle – 5(3), Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai 16Th Floor, Tower 1, One Vs. World Centre, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, Mumbai – 400013 (Pan : Aabcb4623J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee : Shri Ronak Doshi, Ca Revenue : Shri Ajay Chandra, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri Ronak Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Chandra, CIT DR
Section 10Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234ASection 234BSection 37(1)Section 44Section 69C

TDS non compliances. He also asserted that under the IRDAI regulations, insurance companies are required to file their returns giving details of payments of commission, remuneration and reward which has to be filed within 45 days of expiration of each financial year in the prescribed format. Copy of the said return for the year under consideration is placed as part

ADITYA BIRLA SUNLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A) 54, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and that of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1828/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Oct 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2021-22 Aditya Birla Sunlife Insurance Commissioner Of Income Tax Company Ltd., (A) – 54, 16Th Floor, Tower 1, One World Mumbai Vs. Centre, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, Mumbai – 400013 (Pan : Aabcb4623J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2021-22 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Aditya Birla Sunlife Tax – Central Circle – 5(3), Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai 16Th Floor, Tower 1, One Vs. World Centre, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, Mumbai – 400013 (Pan : Aabcb4623J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee : Shri Ronak Doshi, Ca Revenue : Shri Ajay Chandra, Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri Ronak Doshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Chandra, CIT DR
Section 10Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 234ASection 234BSection 37(1)Section 44Section 69C

TDS non compliances. He also asserted that under the IRDAI regulations, insurance companies are required to file their returns giving details of payments of commission, remuneration and reward which has to be filed within 45 days of expiration of each financial year in the prescribed format. Copy of the said return for the year under consideration is placed as part

RGA INTERNATIONAL REINSURANCE COMPANY DESIGNATED AUTHORITY COMPQNY,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 4(1) (1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 803/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Hon'Ble

Section 143(2)Section 144C(5)

115B of the Act. 9. Ground 9 The learned AO has, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, and based on the directions of the Hon'ble DRP, erred in levying interest under section 234B of the Act. 10. Ground 10 The learned AO has, on the facts and circumstances of the case

KAMAL KISHORE RATHI,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4 (3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 7760/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopalआ.अ.सं.7759 & 7760/मुं/2019 िन.व.2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Shah, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Usha Gaikwad, Sr.AR
Section 131Section 147

115B, Shalimar Miracle Opp. ICICI Bank, S V Road Goregaon (West) Mumbai-400062. PAN:AAGPR1508N ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. DCIT, CC-4(3), 1921, Air India Bldg Nariman Point Mumbai-400 021 ..... "ितवादी/Respondent अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant by : Shri Vijay Shah, CA "ितवादी "ारा/Respondent by : Smt. Usha Gaikwad, Sr.AR सुनवाई की ितिथ/ Date of hearing : 22/09/2022 घोषणा की ितिथ

KAMAL KISHORE RATHI,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 4 (3) , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 7759/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai27 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopalआ.अ.सं.7759 & 7760/मुं/2019 िन.व.2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Shah, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Usha Gaikwad, Sr.AR
Section 131Section 147

115B, Shalimar Miracle Opp. ICICI Bank, S V Road Goregaon (West) Mumbai-400062. PAN:AAGPR1508N ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. DCIT, CC-4(3), 1921, Air India Bldg Nariman Point Mumbai-400 021 ..... "ितवादी/Respondent अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant by : Shri Vijay Shah, CA "ितवादी "ारा/Respondent by : Smt. Usha Gaikwad, Sr.AR सुनवाई की ितिथ/ Date of hearing : 22/09/2022 घोषणा की ितिथ