BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,868 results for “TDS”+ Section 10(10)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,868Delhi2,867Bangalore1,317Chennai932Kolkata715Ahmedabad517Pune498Hyderabad414Cochin393Chandigarh337Jaipur324Raipur251Indore246Karnataka230Visakhapatnam139Surat119Cuttack114Nagpur94Rajkot94Lucknow87Jodhpur50Guwahati45Amritsar45Ranchi44Dehradun44Jabalpur36Patna36Agra35Telangana32Panaji28Allahabad18SC18Kerala12Varanasi11Himachal Pradesh7Calcutta7Rajasthan5Uttarakhand3Orissa3Punjab & Haryana2J&K2Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)79Addition to Income47Disallowance41TDS40Section 4039Deduction39Section 26333Section 14825Section 14A24Section 153A

MILESTONE REAL ESTATE FUND,MUMBAI vs. PR.CIT-25, MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 2509/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri N.K Pradhanmilestone Real Estate Fund 402–A, Hallmark Business Plaza Sant Dhyaneshwar Marg ……………. Appellant Bandra, Mumbai 400 051 Pan – Aaati5880L V/S Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax ……………. Respondent Circle–25(3), Mumbai Assessee By : Shri J.D. Mistry, Sr. Counsel A/W Shri Madhur Agarwal Revenue By : Shri Anand Mohan

For Appellant: Shri J.D. Mistry, Sr. Counsel a/wFor Respondent: Shri Anand Mohan
Section 10Section 115USection 263

iii) The learned Principal Commissioner observed, since, the income in respect of which assessee claimed exemption under section 10(23FB) of the Act was earned on investments made prior to 1st April 2012, the amendment made to section 10(23FB) of the Act w.e.f. 1st April 2013, would not apply to the assessee as such amendment will

Showing 1–20 of 2,868 · Page 1 of 144

...
24
Section 20122
Section 14721

ACIT, PIRAMAL CHAMBERS vs. MILESTONE REAL ESTATE FUND, MUMBAI

ITA 194/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Sept 2024AY 2018-19
Section 10Section 10(35)Section 115USection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

10(23FB) and section 115U to provide that: (i) (ii) (iii) The venture Capital undertaking shall have same meaning as provided in relevant SEBI regulations and there would be no sectoral restriction. Income accruing to VCF/VCC shall be taxable in the hands of investor on accrual basis with no deferral. The exemption from applicability of TDS

ACIT 23-1, MUMBAI vs. MILESTONE REAL ESTATE FUND, MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No. 6 raised by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Madhur AgarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Smiti Samant, Shri H.M
Section 1Section 10Section 115USection 143(3)Section 147

10(23FB) and section 115U to provide that: (i) The venture Capital undertaking shall have same meaning as provided in relevant SEBI regulations and there would be no sectoral restriction. (ii) Income accruing to VCF/VCC shall be taxable in the hands of investor on accrual basis with no deferral. (iii) The exemption from applicability of TDS

ACIT-231, MUMBAI vs. MILESTONE REAL ESTATE FUND, MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No. 6 raised by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 368/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Madhur AgarwalFor Respondent: Smt. Smiti Samant, Shri H.M
Section 1Section 10Section 115USection 143(3)Section 147

10(23FB) and section 115U to provide that: (i) The venture Capital undertaking shall have same meaning as provided in relevant SEBI regulations and there would be no sectoral restriction. (ii) Income accruing to VCF/VCC shall be taxable in the hands of investor on accrual basis with no deferral. (iii) The exemption from applicability of TDS

STATE BANK OF INDIA HRMS DEPARTMENT,MUMBAI vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)RANGE-2(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 3112/MUM/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUM vs. ACIT-TDS-2(2), MUM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 3087/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUM vs. ACIT-TDS-2(2),, MUM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 3086/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA-ISB BRANCH,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-TDS-2(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 355/MUM/2023[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA HRMS DEPARTMENT ,MUMBAI vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)RANGE-2(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 3111/MUM/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA-RBO II THANE WESTERN BRANCH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-TDS-2(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 2765/MUM/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA- NRI BRANCH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-TDS-2(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 2744/MUM/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUM vs. ACIT-TDS-2(2), MUM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 3089/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-TDS-2(2), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 2764/MUM/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

STATE BANK OF INDIA,MUM vs. ACIT-TDS-2(2), MUM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statisti...

ITA 3088/MUM/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Ita Nos. 3111& 3112/Mum/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13& 2013-14 State Bank Of India Hrms Acit (Tds) Rg-2(2), Department, Peddar Road, Vs. 4Th Floor, Cidco Tower No. 7, Mumbai-400014. Belapur Railway Station Complex-400614. Tan No. Mums 63193 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Anand Desai & Mr. Sachin Lopes, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Paresh Deshpande, Dr

For Appellant: Mr. Anand Desai &For Respondent: Mr. Paresh Deshpande, DR

III, Nariman Point, Charni Road, Charni Road, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 002 400 002. TAN No. MUMS 35481 F MUMS 35481 F Appellant Respondent Respondent ITA Nos. 2764, 3085/MUM/2022 ITA No Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2012-13, 2013-14 14 State Bank of India – – CPPC ACIT-TDS-2(2), 2(2), Belapur Branch, Smt. K.G. Mittal Smt. K.G. Mittal

PAHILAJRAI JAIKISHAN,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 19(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 994/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Feb 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1562/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11)

Section 14Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 37(1)Section 40

10(4)( b) and 16(1)(b), designates employee's salary as profit, where the servant is none other than a partner, i.e., co-owner of the business. If such be the rationale of the relevant provisions, the key to the solution of the problem is within easy reach.” While the scheme of taxation of partnership firm has undergone

ASST CIT 19(3), MUMBAI vs. PAHILAJRAI JAIKISHIN, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 1562/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Feb 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1562/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11)

Section 14Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 37(1)Section 40

10(4)( b) and 16(1)(b), designates employee's salary as profit, where the servant is none other than a partner, i.e., co-owner of the business. If such be the rationale of the relevant provisions, the key to the solution of the problem is within easy reach.” While the scheme of taxation of partnership firm has undergone

STATE BANK OF INDIA - CUFFE PARADE BRANCH,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-TDS-3(2),, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal is allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 1717/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jan 2021AY 2012-13
Section 10(5)Section 133ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

TDS Ward (3)(2), Mumbai ……………………Respondent Appearances by None for the appellant TS Khalsa for the respondent Date of concluding the hearing : January 19, 2021 Date of pronouncement of the order : January 27, 2021 O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar, VP: This appeal calls into question the correctness of the order dated 11th December 2018 1. passed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 25(3), MUMBAI vs. MILESTONE REAL ESTATE FUND, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment years 2013-

ITA 1144/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Sept 2020AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri J.D. Mistry (AR)For Respondent: Shri V. Sreekar (CIT-DR)
Section 10Section 115USection 143Section 199

10(23FB) of the Act. The assessee further contended that as per the provisions of section 115U of the Act. The assessee furnished the details of income accrued or distributed to each of the contributors and provided the details as per Form 64 to each contributor and complied with the requirements, the assessee is eligible for the TDS credit

DCIT CEN CIR 15 & 16, MUMBAI vs. VIJAY GRIHNIRMAN P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 2882/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri G.M. DossFor Respondent: Shri Bhumika V. Vora
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 263Section 80Section 80I

section 80IB(10) of the Act holding as under: - “7.1 The appellant had claimed deduction under s. 80IB(10) of Rs.5,47,28,624/-. 7.2 For the captioned year, the appellant had claimed deduction under s. 80IB(10) as under: Project Date of Date of Size of plot Deduction u/s commencement Completion (Approx.) 80IB V Nagari Annex

DCIT CEN CIR 15 & 16, MUMBAI vs. VIJAY GRIHNIRMAN P. LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 3498/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sandeep Gosain

For Appellant: Shri G.M. DossFor Respondent: Shri Bhumika V. Vora
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 263Section 80Section 80I

section 80IB(10) of the Act holding as under: - “7.1 The appellant had claimed deduction under s. 80IB(10) of Rs.5,47,28,624/-. 7.2 For the captioned year, the appellant had claimed deduction under s. 80IB(10) as under: Project Date of Date of Size of plot Deduction u/s commencement Completion (Approx.) 80IB V Nagari Annex