BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

352 results for “TDS”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna468Delhi429Mumbai352Pune224Bangalore218Chennai163Indore151Kolkata125Cochin59Ahmedabad56Chandigarh55Hyderabad50Jaipur38Nagpur31Jabalpur27Lucknow25Karnataka24Raipur24Visakhapatnam23Surat19Agra17Jodhpur15Rajkot14Amritsar7Cuttack5Panaji4Allahabad4SC1Ranchi1Telangana1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 154114TDS60Section 143(1)58Addition to Income47Rectification u/s 15439Disallowance38Section 4033Section 143(3)32Section 25031Section 80P(2)(d)

ROSE ROCK REAL ESTATE INDIA PVT.,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(1)(3), MUMBAI

In the result, these appeals are allowed

ITA 4824/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Sept 2021AY 2013-14
Section 154Section 190Section 200ASection 203ASection 204Section 234ESection 285

TDS late fees u/s. statement statement 234E Q3(26Q) 15th Jan 2014 10th Dec 2014 329 days Rs. 37080/- Q4(26Q) 15th May 2014 10th Dec 2014 209 days Rs. 41800/- Total in Rs. Rs.78,880/- The deductor had filed the rectification application U/s 154

MONISH BIPIN SHAH ,MUMBAI vs. DY.COM. OF INCOME TAX ,CPC, (JAO: CIRCLE 27(2), MUMBAI

Showing 1–20 of 352 · Page 1 of 18

...
27
Deduction26
Section 14A23

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 4957/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Prabash Shankarassessment Year: 2016-17 Monish Bipin Shah Dy. Com. Of Income Tax, C-1002, Lodha Bellissimo, Cpc [Jao : Circle 27(2), N. M. Joshi Marg, Mumbai] Jacob Circle, Room No. 419, Mumbai- 400011. 4Th Floor, Tower No. 6, Flat 22, Nirmala Mahal, Vashi Railway Station, Vs. Bomenji Petit Road Breach Commercial Complex, Vashi, Candy, Navi Mumbai- 400703. Mumbai- 400036. Pan: Aglps5759F (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Ajay R. Singh/Akshay PawarFor Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana (SR. D.R.)
Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 154

Rectification U/s 154 insofar as treating the application as Fresh Claim for TDS as not being a mistake apparent from

FLEMINGO LINERS PVT LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WQARD-15(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 6176/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Jan 2025AY 2012-13
For Appellant: \nShri Jaiprakash BairagraFor Respondent: \nMs. Nidhi Agarwal (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(7)Section 234B

TDS credits and deleting of erroneously charged interest u/s 234B\nbefore the ld. AO, who passed the rectification order u/s 154

EXPRESS GLOBAL LOGISTICS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 2(1)(2), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed as indicated above

ITA 1194/MUM/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Tanmay PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri. Ram Tiwari
Section 143(1)Section 154

TDS credits allowed by the AO in the intimation issued u/s 143(1), the assessee filed rectification application vide letter dated 24-05-2013 u/s. 154

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 905/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS and interest thereon. Thereafter the assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act by which it was submitted

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 864/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS and interest thereon. Thereafter the assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act by which it was submitted

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 903/MUM/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS and interest thereon. Thereafter the assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act by which it was submitted

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 904/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS and interest thereon. Thereafter the assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act by which it was submitted

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 863/MUM/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS and interest thereon. Thereafter the assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act by which it was submitted

MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) 2(2), MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 906/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS and interest thereon. Thereafter the assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act by which it was submitted

ITO (TDS) (OSD) RG 2, MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MUMBAI

In the result the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 862/MUM/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Aug 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.862 To 864/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10) Income Tax Officer- बनाम/ M/S Maharashtra Pollution Control (Tds)(Osd)Rg-2, Board, Vs. Room No.704,7Th Floor, Kalpataru Point Building, 2Nd Floor, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002 Mumbai-400022. (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.902 To 906/Mum/2014 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Years : 2005-06 To 2009-10) M/S Maharashtra Pollution बनाम/ Income Tax Officer-(Tds) -2(2), Room No.707,7Th Floor, Control Board, Vs. Kalpataru Point Building, K.G.Mittal Hospital Building, 2Nd Floor,Opp. Cinemax Multiplex, Charni Road, Sion, Mumbai-400002. Mumbai-400022 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Respondent: Shri G N Makwana
Section 133ASection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 268A

TDS and interest thereon. Thereafter the assessee filed a rectification application u/s 154 of the Act by which it was submitted

NELITO SYSTEMS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 15(2)(2), MUMBAI

ITA 5386/MUM/2019[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Nov 2021AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar () & Shri Ravish Sood () Nelito Systems Limited Asstt. Commissioner Of 205 – 208, Building-2, Vs. Income Tax, Circle-15(2)(2) Sector -1, Millennium Business Room No.357, 3Rd Floor, Park, Mahape, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Navi Mumbai – 400 710 Mumbai – 400 020 Pan No. Aaacn1818L (Assessee) (Revenue) Assessee By : Shri Sunil Bhandari, A.R Revenue By : Shri Tharian Oommen, D.R Date Of Hearing : 23/09/2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 23/11/2021

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Bhandari, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Tharian Oommen, D.R
Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 244A

TDS, TCS and Advance Tax paid by the assessee company. On appeal, we find that the CIT(A), being of the view that the impugned order before him was an order passed by the A.O u/s 154 of the Act declining the assessee‟s request for rectification

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (LTU)-2, MUMBAI

In the result, this appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 5421/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Sept 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Justice P.P.Bhatt & Shri Shamim Yahya

For Appellant: Shri Nimesh Vora-ARFor Respondent: Ms. R.M.Madhavi-CIT(DR)
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 154Section 154(7)Section 234D

TDS credit To grant Forerign Tax credit Rectifying levy of interest u/s. 234D and 220(2) Totaling error in computation of income u/s 115JB Reduce taxable interest u/s 244A while computing normal income in view of lower Refund of AY 2003-04 and 2003-04 and 2004-05 due to order giving effect to CIT(A) order Consequential withdrawal

EIGHT ROADS INVESTMENT ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE , BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed, as per our aforesaid

ITA 2928/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2928/Mum/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2020-21 Eight Roads Investment Advisors Private Limited 16Th Floor, Plot No.82, Avighna House, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai-400 018 Pan: Aabcf1370N ........अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax/Cpc, Bengaluru ……""यथ" / Respondent

For Appellant: Ms.Chandari Shah a/wFor Respondent: Shri Himanshu Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

u/s. 154 of the Act, dated 24.09.2021 for the assessment year 2020-21 as per the following grounds of appeal: “Ground No. 1 On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre ('Ld.CIT(A)') has erred in dismissing the appeal by passing an ex-parte order under section

NAVIN VINODKUMAR AGARWAL,THANE vs. DCIT 14(1)(2), AAYAKAR ABHAVAN MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee

ITA 8445/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2018-19

For Respondent: Mr. Mahesh Saboo
Section 154

rectification request with CPC against the said order against which another order u/s 154 dated 09.09.2020 was against which another order u/s 154 dated 09.09.2020 was against which another order u/s 154 dated 09.09.2020 was passed by CPC but without modifying passed by CPC but without modifying the earlier order dated the earlier order dated 24.08.2020. Appellant claimed that TDS

ASST. CIT-1(3)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S. TILAKNAGAR INDUSTRIES LTD., MUMBAI

ITA 1355/MUM/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Sept 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Baskaran B.R & Shri Vikas Awasthyआअसं. 1355/मुं/2021 ("न.व. 2009-10) Acit-1(3)(1), Room No.540, 5Th Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai – 400 020 ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. M/S. Tilaknagar Industries Limited. 3Rd Floor, Indl.Assurance Bldg. Jd Tata Marg, Churchgate, Mumbai 400 020 Pan:Aaact-6047-R ..... ""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant By : Shri Rajesh Damor ""तवाद" "वारा/Respondent By : Dr. K.Shivram, Sr. Advocate With Ms. Neelam Jadhav सुनवाई क" "त"थ/ Date Of Hearing : 04/07/2022 घोषणा क" "त"थ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 29/09/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-47, Mumbai [In Short ‘The Cit(A)] Dated 04/01/2021 For The Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case As Emanating From Records Are: The Assessee Is Engaged In Manufacturing & Selling Of Indian Made Foreign Liquor. The 2 Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income For A.Y 2009-10 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.29,19,12,503/- On 30/09/2009. The Assessment Order U/S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) Was Passed On 07/12/2011. Thereafter, The Assessing Officer Issued Notice U/S. 154 Of The Act Dated 18/03/2013 To Rectify The Alleged Mistake In Assessment Order On Two Counts:

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh DamorFor Respondent: Dr. K.Shivram, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Neelam Jadhav
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 154(7)Section 40

TDS was inadvertently accepted, later on the Assessing Officer rectified the mistake in proceedings under section 154 of the Act. The ld.Departmental Representative submitted that rectification proceedings are continuation of the proceedings initiated vide notice dated 18/03/2013, hence, the order passed u/s

JANI PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 2(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2640/MUM/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh (Jm) & Shri Rifaur Rahman (Am) Jani Properties Pvt Ltd Vs Ito, 2(2)(1), Gkdj & Associates, Cas Aayakar Bhavan, 333, Sohrab Hall, 21, Sassoon M.K. Road, Road, Opp Jehangir Hospital, Mumbai -400020 Pune-411 001 Pan : Aaacj7356D Appellant Respondednt

Section 115Section 115JSection 115OSection 154Section 234B

TDS credit, it is clear that the time limit for passing the impugned order indeed expired on expiry of four years from the end of the financial year, in which, the original order sought to be rectified was passed i.e. on 31.3.2007. There is no dispute that in terms of provisions of section 154(7), no amendment under section 154

NAVNATH DURYODHAN GOLANDE,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), KALYAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5567/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2017-18 Navnath Duryodhan Golande, Ito Ward 1(1) H.No. 1005, Shree Krishna Hsg. Soc. Mohan Plaza, Khadakpada, Kalyan Vs. Subhash Nagar, Kalyan Road, (West)-421301. Bhiwandi-421302. Na Kulkarni (Advocate) Wadal Bldg., Near Dns Bank Manpada Road, Dombivali (East)-421201. Pan No. Aiwpg 8278 J Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Pravin Salukhe, Sr. DRFor Respondent: None
Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

TDS) and tax collected at source(TCS TCS) was not granted to the assessee. Therefore, was not granted to the assessee. Therefore, the assessee filed rectification rectification application u/s 154

CYRUS INVESTMENT P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 1(1)(1), MUMBAI

The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our above order

ITA 1451/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Behari Lal - Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Neil Philip-Ld.DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154

u/s 154 on 03/11/2016 so as to reduce the TDS credit as irregularly allowed. In the rectification order u/s 154

UNION BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT LTU-2, , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for assessment years 2009-10

ITA 1580/MUM/2020[UNION BANK OF INDIA]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Apr 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Gagan Goyal

Section 14ASection 154Section 36(1)

rectification u/s 154. 4. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance u/s 14A without appreciating that appellant being trader is securities has incurred expenses for buying and selling securities and not for earning of tax free income and accordingly, no disallowance is warranted.” Revenue’s Appeal “Whether on the facts