BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

191 results for “TDS”+ Charitable Trustclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai210Mumbai191Delhi176Karnataka105Bangalore83Pune70Hyderabad55Kolkata41Chandigarh40Jaipur35Lucknow27Ahmedabad21Amritsar16Visakhapatnam13Rajkot12Cochin11Agra10Cuttack8Indore7Varanasi6Jodhpur6Kerala5Nagpur3Ranchi3Surat3Allahabad2Patna2Dehradun2Rajasthan2Telangana2Punjab & Haryana1Raipur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 11127Section 14A67Section 143(3)58Section 4056Section 143(1)52Section 2(15)47Section 1047Exemption45Addition to Income43TDS

NANDLAL TOLANI CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD-2(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed is dismissed in the above terms

ITA 113/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Jul 2024AY 2014-15
Section 10Section 11Section 14Section 24Section 250

Charitable Trust; A.Y. 2014-15 and A.Y. 2015-16 the Assessment Order and not the amount shown in Form No. 10 filed. It is further contended that the Ld. AO erred in not allowing deduction for actual repairs amounting to Rs. 18,65,693/- as shown in Income and Expenditure Account and also the Ld. AO erred in not allowing

NANDLAL TOLANI CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. ITO EXEM WARD 2(1), CUMBALLA HILL, MUMBAI

ITA 650/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 191 · Page 1 of 10

...
41
Section 12A40
Disallowance40
ITAT Mumbai
23 Jul 2024
AY 2015-16
Section 10Section 11Section 14Section 24Section 250

Charitable Trust; A.Y. 2014-15 and A.Y. 2015-16\nthe Assessment Order and not the amount shown in Form No. 10 filed.\nIt is further contended that the Ld. AO erred in not allowing deduction\nfor actual repairs amounting to Rs. 18,65,693/- as shown in Income\nand Expenditure Account and also the Ld. AO erred in not allowing

SHREE MEWAD JAIN SWETAMBER MURTIPUJAK CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI

ITA 1008/MUM/2018[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2019AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh. Shamim Yahya, Am & Hon’Ble Sh. Sandeep Gosain, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1008/Mum/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18)

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Ms. Awangshi Gimson
Section 12ASection 12A(1)

TDS Dues, Return Filing Fees, etc. 6. It was further submitted that since the Appellant Trust had not commenced any of the activities as specified in the objects of the Trust. So, the genuineness of the activities cannot be determined till the time activities are actually carried out by the Appellant Trust. But the Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application

RAHULKUMAR BAJAJ CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 1769/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

For Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250

trust without registration u/s. 12A/12AA of the Act and assessed to tax as an Association of Persons (AOP) carrying out various charitable activities by granting donations to other charitable trusts/institutions engaged in similar activities and said to have valid exemption certificate. The assessee had filed its return of income declaring total income at Rs.59,04,620/-, dated

RAHULKUMAR BAJAJ CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 1768/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

For Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250

trust without registration u/s. 12A/12AA of the Act and assessed to tax as an Association of Persons (AOP) carrying out various charitable activities by granting donations to other charitable trusts/institutions engaged in similar activities and said to have valid exemption certificate. The assessee had filed its return of income declaring total income at Rs.59,04,620/-, dated

RAHULKUMAR BAJAJ CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 1770/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Dec 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

For Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250

trust without registration u/s. 12A/12AA of the Act and assessed to tax as an Association of Persons (AOP) carrying out various charitable activities by granting donations to other charitable trusts/institutions engaged in similar activities and said to have valid exemption certificate. The assessee had filed its return of income declaring total income at Rs.59,04,620/-, dated

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3794/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3795/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3800/MUM/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-43 OR CIT VENTRAL 4, MUMBAI

ITA 3081/MUM/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION)- 1(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6953/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-43 OR CIT CENTRAL 4, MUMBAI

ITA 3084/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-43 OR CIT CENTRAL 4, MUMBAI

ITA 3083/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, MUMBAI

ITA 3080/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-43 OR CIT CENTRAL 4, MUMBAI

ITA 3082/MUM/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3793/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION)- 1(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6954/MUM/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

M/S. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION)- 1(3), MUMBAI

ITA 6952/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

ITO (E) 1(3), MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION, MUMBAI

ITA 3801/MUM/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust

ASST CIT CC 43, MUMBAI vs. FREE TRADE UNION MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT TRUST, MUMBAI

ITA 1336/MUM/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Dec 2015AY 2003-04

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & G. Manjunatha, Am

For Appellant: N. R Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Pooja Swaroop, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 13(1)Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

TDS and further challenged action of the ld. CIT(A) non adjudication of specific ground No. 8 taken for Asst. Year 2005-06. The assessee also filed 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust