Search: section 68

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 5A(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka298 Delhi105 Mumbai90 Pune67 Hyderabad33 Bangalore30 Kolkata30 Chennai28 Jaipur20 Ahmedabad18 Raipur17 Surat9 SC8 Indore7 Ranchi7 Telangana6 Panaji3 Lucknow3 Chandigarh3 Amritsar2 Cuttack2 Patna2 Nagpur1 Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 1014 Section 8(2)2 Section 172 Section 2(5)2 Section 2(7)2 Section 22

M/S U.P STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI, KANPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee is held to be partly allowed

ITA 3/LKW/2004[1995-96]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow14 Oct 2025AY 1995-96

For Appellant: \nSh. Pankaj Shukla, Adv & Shubham

Section 10Section 17Section 2Section 2(5)Section 2(7)Section 8(2)

68 ITR 416 (Gujarat). Thereafter, it was argued that the\nassessee was not a credit institution as defined in section 2(5A) nor a finance\ncompany as defined in section 2(5B) of the Interest Tax Act and thus the Act did not\napply to the assessee. It also argued that since it was a State Government Company

M/S U.P STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI, KANPUR

M/S U.P STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI, KANPUR

M/S U.P STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI, KANPUR

VINAI SHUKLA,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT-1, LUCKNOW NEW, LUCKNOW