BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

25 results for “section 68”+ Section 482clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka322Delhi293Mumbai169Kolkata141Bangalore116Ahmedabad84Agra62Jaipur55Chandigarh31Chennai29Lucknow25Indore24Hyderabad15Cochin13Pune12Surat9Dehradun8Guwahati8Visakhapatnam7Jodhpur7Raipur4Varanasi4Telangana4SC4Allahabad3Rajkot3Ranchi2Cuttack2Orissa1Nagpur1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 1132Section 1516Section 2(15)16Addition to Income16Section 69C15Section 143(3)9Survey u/s 133A9Section 12A8Exemption8

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,BAREILLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 3(4), RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ITA 24/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S Sahara City Homes – Bareilly V. Ito-3(4) 2, Sahara India Centre Range 3 Kapoorthala Complex Lucknow Aliganj, Lucknow Tan/Pan:Abzfs2472C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S Sahara City Homes – Amritsar V. Ito-3(4) 2, Sahara India Centre Lucknow Tan/Pan:Abzfs4654E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S Sahara City Homes – Kanpur(I) V. Acit 2, Sahara India Centre Range 3 Kapoorthala Complex Lucknow Aliganj, Lucknow Tan/Pan:Abzfs2468Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S Sahara City Homes – Guwahati V. Acit 2, Sahara India Centre Range 3 Kapoorthala Complex Lucknow Aliganj, Lucknow Tan/Pan:Abzfs2462E (Appellant) (Respondent)

482/-; that the land and development rights were to be acquired by the transferor within a period of one year and the price thereof was to be determined mutually; that the valuation of the WIP was not mandatory; that in any case, no addition under section 69C of the Act was called for; that the consideration mentioned

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,KARNAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -3(4), RANGE-3, LUCKNOW

ITA 36/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

ITAT Lucknow
31 Jan 2022
AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,VADODARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 3(4), RANGE-3, LUCKNOW

ITA 33/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,KURUKSHETRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 3(4), LUCKNOW

ITA 30/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 34), RANGE-3, LUCKNOW

ITA 38/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,AMBALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -3(4), RANGE-3, LUCKNOW

ITA 34/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,MORADABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 3(4), RANGE-3, LUCKNOW

ITA 31/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,ANAND vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 3(4), RANGE-3, LUCKNOW

ITA 39/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,MUZAFFAR NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 3(4), RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

ITA 35/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,ALIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 3(4), RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

ITA 32/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,DEVAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 3(4), RANGE-3, LUCKNOW

ITA 28/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 3(4), LUCKNOW

ITA 25/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,KANPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

ITA 26/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,GUWAHATI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

ITA 27/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,CHENNAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

ITA 29/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -3(4), LUCKNOW

ITA 37/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sushil Madhuk, CIT (DR) (on 4.2.2020 and 5.2.2020) & Smt
Section 69C

482/- only. However, in the process, the ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the addition in respect of WIP acquired from SPCL as well as expenditure incurred during the year and debited to the WIP. 35. In any case, it is beyond comprehension as to how, if the party to the agreement does not exercise the right of carrying out valuation

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 630/LKW/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

section 12AA of the Act, which would be very much indifference to the intention of the legislature. In fact, the assessee authority is working on commercial pattern like a big Page 47 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) businessman. Even otherwise, if some plots are reserved for economically weaker sections of the society, firstly, there

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 164/LKW/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

section 12AA of the Act, which would be very much indifference to the intention of the legislature. In fact, the assessee authority is working on commercial pattern like a big Page 47 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) businessman. Even otherwise, if some plots are reserved for economically weaker sections of the society, firstly, there

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 631/LKW/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

section 12AA of the Act, which would be very much indifference to the intention of the legislature. In fact, the assessee authority is working on commercial pattern like a big Page 47 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) businessman. Even otherwise, if some plots are reserved for economically weaker sections of the society, firstly, there

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 165/LKW/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

section 12AA of the Act, which would be very much indifference to the intention of the legislature. In fact, the assessee authority is working on commercial pattern like a big Page 47 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) businessman. Even otherwise, if some plots are reserved for economically weaker sections of the society, firstly, there