SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA,LUCKNOW vs. THE ASSESSMENT UNIT, NFAC, DELHI/ITO-1(4), LUCKNOW
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 498/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Santosh Kumar Gupta V. The Assessment Unit (Nfac) 624 61, Chinhat Ito 1(4), Lucknow Faizabad Road Lucknow (U.P) Tan/Pan:Ahspg3013E (Applicant) (Respondent) Applicant By: Shri Mahendra Kumar, Fca Respondent By: Shri R.R.N. Shukla, D.R. O R D E R This Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 29.05.2024, Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Nfac) For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2.0 The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Was Carrying On The Business Of Mobiles, Electrical & Electronic Goods. The Assessee Had Not Filed The Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration. The Income Tax Department Was In Possession Of Information That The Assessee Had Made Cash Deposits Of Rs.15,60,000/- During The Demonetization Period (From 09.11.2016 To 31.12.2016) In His Four Different Bank Accounts Bearing A/C Nos.20050580560 & 31121736248, Maintained With State Bank Of India, Chinhat Branch, Lucknow, A/C No.1840210572, Maintained With Central Bank Of India
For Respondent: Shri R.R.N. Shukla, D.R
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 144Section 44ASection 69A
68,786/- and the same was treated as the business income and was also added to the total income of the assessee. The AO completed the assessment
ITA No.498/LKW/2025 Page 3 of 6
under section 144 of the Act, assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.29,56,290/-.
2.2
The AO also invoked the provisions of section