Search: section 68

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai66 Mumbai46 Jaipur37 Hyderabad28 Karnataka21 Ahmedabad20 Kolkata17 Rajkot15 Pune12 Indore11 Delhi11 Bangalore9 Surat8 Dehradun8 Cochin7 Chandigarh4 Lucknow4 Patna3 Nagpur2 SC2 Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 687 Addition to Income4 Section 2743 Section 271b3 Penalty3 Disallowance3 Natural Justice3 Section 133(6)2

BHAWANI DEVELOPERS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), LUCKNOW-NEW, LUCKNOW-NEW

Appeal is disposed of in accordance with the aforesaid\ndirections

ITA 253/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow09 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 68

68 of the Act of Rs.20,25,54,000/-.\n3.2\nVariation-II\n3.2.1 Variation on account of labour charges\n3.2.2 During the year under consideration, the assessee has debited labour charges to\nthe tune of Rs.5,79,26,290/- against the total contract receipts of 7,89,21,744/- in the profit\nand loss account. During the course of assessment

MADAN LAL JAIN,KANPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), KANPUR

In the result, these appeals in ITA

BHAWANI DEVELOPERS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), LUCKNOW-NEW, LUCKNOW-NEW

MADAN LAL JAIN,KANPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), KANPUR

BHAWANI DEVELOPERS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), LUCKNOW-NEW, LUCKNOW-NEW

MADAN LAL JAIN,KANPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), KANPUR

MADAN LAL JAIN,KANPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), KANPUR

SHRI MADAN LAL JAIN,KANPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 (NOW ITO-1(2)), KANPUR