Search: section 68

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 151Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai64 Delhi21 Ahmedabad13 Jaipur11 Chandigarh9 Visakhapatnam7 Pune6 Kolkata6 Hyderabad5 Chennai5 Raipur5 Lucknow4 Rajkot3 Indore1 Bangalore1 Dehradun1 Guwahati1 Agra1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 253(3)3 Section 1323 Search & Seizure3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 69A2

RAJENDRA SINGH,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. LD. AO, ASSESSMENT UNIT, JURISDICTIONAL AO- ITO-1(4) SHAHJAHANPUR-1, SHAHJAHANPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 645/LKW/2024[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Lucknow24 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151ASection 69A

151A, is without jurisdiction, bad in law, the same and the assessment framed thereafter be quashed.” (A.1) The Assessing Officer passed the assessment order u/s 147 read with section 144/144B of the Act and determined the total income of the assessee at Rs.63,68

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

RAJENDRA SINGH,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. LD. AO, ASSESSMENT UNIT, JURISDICTIONAL AO- ITO-1(4) SHAHJAHANPUR-1, SHAHJAHANPUR

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

RAJENDRA SINGH,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. LD. AO, ASSESSMENT UNIT, JURISDICTIONAL AO- ITO-1(4) SHAHJAHANPUR-1, SHAHJAHANPUR

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW