BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi48Mumbai22Bangalore22Chennai22Jaipur14Hyderabad14Kolkata9Patna8Raipur8Indore8Ahmedabad8Lucknow6Visakhapatnam5Agra4Jodhpur4Chandigarh2Karnataka2Pune2Dehradun1Nagpur1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 145(3)4Section 253(3)4Section 142(1)4Condonation of Delay4Section 693Section 54F3Section 1323Search & Seizure3Section 56(2)(vii)

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 350/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 250Section 253(3)

Reassessment Proceeding.\ndt. 05.09.2023, 08.02.2024, 11.03.2024, 16.03.2024,\n15.03.2024\n6. Original Assessment Order u/s 143(3) dt. 23.04.2021 and\nCIT(A) order u/s 250 dt. 25.06.2024\n7. Assessment Order u/s 147 dt. 28.03.2024\n8. Copy of Form-35\n9. Copy of Replies filed before CIT(A)-3, Lucknow dt.\n07.01.2025\n10. Copy of CIT(A)-3, Lucknow Order u/s

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

2
House Property2
Deduction2
Disallowance2
ITA 349/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed
ITAT Lucknow
11 Dec 2025
AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 351/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 460/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 353/LKW/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2022-23
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69

54F \nof Income Tax Act, 1961. \n\n6. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in \ndeleting the addition of Rs.1,00,000/- in respect of gift received from father Shri \nSurya Narayan Pandey without appreciating the fact that the assessee has not \nproduced any documentary evidence in support of his claim

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT, (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 347/LKW/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2014-15
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 56(2)(vii)Section 69

u/s 80G to the extent of \ndonation of Rs.9,00,000/- out of Rs.14,06,000/- allowed part relief to the \nextent of Rs.6,00,000/-. \n5. Because the Ld. CIT(A) Lucknow-III has erred on facts & law while not \n"\n306 \n", "summary": { "facts": "The assessee is a government contractor engaged in the business of construction of roads